The September issue looks at the debate over shoring up struggling nuclear power plants. The magazine also looks at civics knowledge, health care for former inmates, the damage a missing comma can do to legislation and much more.
Current Issue
Certificate of Need (C.O.N.) programs are aimed at restraining health care facility costs and facilitating coordinated planning of new services and facility construction. Many "CON" laws initially were put into effect across the nation as part of the federal "Health Planning Resources Development Act" of 1974. Despite numerous changes in the past 30 years, most states retain some type of CON program, law or agency as of 2016.
The basic assumption underlying CON regulation is that excess capacity stemming from overbuilding of health care facilities results in health care price inflation. Price inflation can occur when a hospital cannot fill its beds and fixed costs must be met through higher charges for the beds that are used. Bigger institutions generally have bigger costs, so CON supporters say it makes sense to limit facilities to building only enough capacity to meet actual need or demand.
CON programs originated to regulate the number of beds in hospitals and nursing homes and to prevent purchasing more equipment than necessary. Mandatory regulation through health planning agencies determined the most urgent health care needs, contributed to solutions for these needs and attempted to manage the fluctuations in prices often found in a competitive market. The intent was that new or improved facilities or equipment would be approved based primarily on a community’s genuine need. Statutory criteria often were created to help planning agencies decide what was necessary for a given location. By reviewing the activities and resources of hospitals, the agencies made judgments about what needed to be improved. Once need was established, the applicant organization was granted permission to begin a project. These approvals generally are known as "Certificates of Need."
The first national law related to this issue was the Hill-Burton Act in 1946, which was intended to control increase the supply of medical facilities in the country.
In 1964, New York became the first state to enact a statute granting the state government power to determine whether there was a need for any new hospital or nursing home before it was approved for construction. In 1974, the federal government tied funding to CON programs. The 1974 federal Act required all 50 states to have structures involving the submission of proposals and obtaining approval from a state health planning agency before beginning any major capital projects such as building expansions or ordering new high-tech devices. By 1975, 20 states had enacted CON laws; by 1978, 36 states had enacted them. Eventually, all states except Louisiana enacted such laws.
The federal mandate was repealed in 1987, along with the associated federal funding. In the decade that followed,
States that have retained CON programs currently tend to concentrate activities on outpatient facilities and long-term care. This is largely due to the trend toward free-standing, physician owned facilities that constitute an increasing segment of the health-care market.
Scroll over the map below and click on the states to retrieve a list of the facilities covered under the CON laws of each state.
Variation on CON program* (click on map for details)
Source: NCSL, August 2016
STATE
MORATORIA?
FACILITIES COVERED UNDER MORATORIA
Alabama
Yes
Skilled nursing beds (Ala. Admin. Code r. 410-2-4-.03);
Alaska
No
Arizona
Arkansas
ICF/MR (Ark. Admin. Code 049.00.1-005), psychiatric residential facilities, residential care facilities, hospice services (Ark. Admin. Code 049.00.1-003)
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Nursing homes (C.G.S.A. § 17b-354), hospital mergers and acquisitions until 2017
Delaware
No additional hospitals offering medical/surgical or obstetrical beds shall be established for five years (2014).
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Comprehensive care beds—effective for three years (2015)
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Adult residential care providers (ARCP), intermediate care facilities for the developmentally disabled (ICF/DD), nursing homes; long-term care hospital facilities and beds (LSA-R.S. 40:2103)
Maine
Maryland
No*
“The Commission may not issue a certificate of need or a determination with respect to an acquisition that authorizes a general hospice to provide home-based hospice services on a statewide basis.” (MD Code, Health - General, § 19-120)
Massachusetts
Long term care beds
Michigan
Minnesota
Hospitals and hospital bed expansions (M.S.A. § 144.551), nursing homes, radiation therapy facilities (certain locations)
Mississippi
“New construction of, addition to, expansion of, or conversion of vacant hospital beds to provide skilled or intermediate nursing home care,” “new construction, addition to, or expansion of an intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded (ICF/MR),” new Medicaid-certified inpatient psychiatric beds for children/adolescents, “new Medicaid-certified child/adolescent chemical dependency beds,” (Miss. Admin. Code 15-8-90) 103.02 Certificate of Need Criteria and Standards for the Establishment of a Home Health Agency and/or the Offering of Home Health Services, conversion of vacant hospital beds to provide skilled or intermediate nursing home care
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Long-term care beds (Neb.Rev.St. § 71-5829.04), rehabilitation beds (Neb.Rev.St. § 71-5829.06)
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Nursing homes, comprehensive rehabilitation, and home health care agencies subject to the issuance of a call for applications. (N.J.A.C. T. 8, Ch. 33, 8:33 APP. B; N.J.A.C. 8:33H–1.1)
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio has an effective, though not official, moratorium on long term-care facilities.; Addition of long-term care beds to an existing long-term care facility or for the development of a new long-term care facility (R.C. § 3702.59)
Oklahoma
Long term care
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Nursing home beds, nursing home bed capacity expansion (Gen.Laws 1956, § 23-17-44)
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Nursing home bed banking program
West Virginia
In-home personal care services, opioid treatment programs (W. Va. Code, § 16-5Y-12), new skilled nursing facilities or ICF/DD, intermediate care or skilled nursing bed additions to existing facilities (W. Va. Code, § 16-2D-9).
Wisconsin
Statewide nursing home bed limit (W.S.A. 150.21; W.S.A. 150.31).
Wyoming
District of Columbia
Puerto Rico
No data
US Virgin Islands
NCSL Resources
Federal Resources
Other Resources
Contact the Authors: Richard Cauchi, Health Program director and Ashley Noble, Health Program policy specialist.
7700 East First Place Denver, CO 80230 Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800
444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 Washington, D.C. 20001 Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069