The Early Care and Education E-update is created quarterly as an information service for state legislators and legislative staff who are part of NCSL's Child Care and Early Education Legislative Network. Outside links are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute an endorsement by NCSL. This e-update is made possible by the generous support of the Alliance for Early Success.
Contact Alison May for more information at 303-856-1473 or to offer information from your state. You may also request to subscribe, if you are a legislator or legislative staff, or unsubscribe by emailing email@example.com.
Outside links are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute an endorsement by NCSL.
Recently released pieces related to state policies on a variety of early care and education topics.
Click to View the Spring 2015 e-update as a PDF
View previous editions of this publication
2014 CCDBG Reauthorization Act: Implications and Opportunities for State Legislatures
Hot off the press! Read NCSL’s newly created policy primer that provides background on the major provisions of the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) Act of 2014 as well as information on state flexibility and opportunities, recent state legislative examples and actions currently being considered by states.
In November 2014, Congress reauthorized CCDBG for the first time since 1996. The new law gives legislators an opportunity to take a leadership role to not only comply with the required policy changes in the new law but also to weigh in on designing a child care system that meets the needs of children and their families. It is also a vehicle to connect this work to the broader early learning efforts in their states.
Funding Pre-K through the School Funding Formula
Sixteen states and the District of Columbia use the school funding or finance formula to fund pre-K.
Some states have found benefits to funding pre-K through a state’s school funding formula, such as being able to sustain funding based on program costs and demand. Some states, however, have experienced challenges in phasing in formula funding for pre-K. Using the formula helps support pre-K programs because it forces budget makers to ask how much to fund or increase funding for pre-K, rather than whether to fund it at all. In addition, funding formulas are based on enrollment counts so pre-K funding can increase with enrollment growth.
In just a few short weeks the 2015 NCSL Early Learning Fellows will be notified of their selection and then the real fun can start. For those unfamiliar with the Fellows program, it’s designed for legislators and legislative staff who are experienced or emerging leaders on early childhood and early learning issues. Now starting a fourth year, the program is composed of two face-to-face meetings and two webinars and is geared toward those chairing or serving on human services, education or appropriations committees who want to expand their knowledge and learn from other legislators and experts across the country.
The 2015 Fellows will be selected by the middle of June and will represent regional and party diversity. Once selected, the group will meet during NCSL’s Legislative Summit Aug. 2-3 in Seattle where they will learn from experts about brain science research, the latest legislative and policy trends on early learning issues, and be given a chance to take a tour and site visit of Educare Seattle. Interested to learn more about the program? You may do so at the Fellows webpage.
Question: How many states provide a state child and dependent care tax credit and how do these states base their credit on the federal Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit?
Answer: Twenty-six states including D.C. offer a state tax credit and/or deduction to help families with child and dependent care costs. States primarily employ three methods to determine these credits: tax credits as a percentage of the federal allowable credit, tax credits as a percentage of expenses that are eligible for the federal credit, and tax deductions for expenses that are eligible for the federal credit. A number of states have also set state-specific provisions in addition to these general methods (see tables below).
Background: The federal Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit is a nonrefundable tax credit that helps families offset the cost of care needed for a child or a dependent adult so they can work or look for work. This credit has been in place since 1976 as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1976. Tax filers can receive a credit between 20 and 35 percent, depending on gross income, of work-related care expenses up to $3,000 for a single individual and $6,000 for two or more individuals.
Type of Tax Credits/Deductions
Tax credit as percentage of federal credit
17 states (Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland*, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island and Vermont)
Tax credit as percentage of expenses eligible for federal credit
1 state (South Carolina)
Tax deduction for expenses eligible for federal credit
4 states (Idaho, Maryland*, Massachusetts, and Virginia)
*Maryland is mentioned twice in the table because the state has a Child and Dependent Care (CDCTC) tax deduction for eligible expenses and a separate tax credit for tax filers with income of $50,000 or less.
Minnesota: Tax credit partially based on amount of federal credit
Eligible income between $23,380-$37,030
New Mexico: Tax credit for a portion of expenses, affected by, but not based on federal credit
Eligible maximum income: $30,160
Hawaii: Tax credit for a portion of expenses, not based on federal credit
Eligible income between $22,000-$40,000
Oregon: Tax credit for a portion of expenses, not based on federal credit and not limited in amount
Eligible maximum income: $45,000
Montana: Tax deduction for expenses, not based on federal credit and with a specified maximum
Eligible income between $22,800-$27,600 (depending on family type)
This information was sourced from the National Women’s Law Center report, Making Care Less Taxing-Improving State Child and Dependent Care Tax Provisions (2011) and the 2015 Supplement to Making Care Less Taxing.
NCSL tracks legislation related to child and dependent care tax credit/deductions. Please visit the NCSL Early Care and Education database for pending and enacted legislation.
Resources on Tax Credits and/or Deductions for Child Care Costs:
Minn. Stat. § 290.067
Minnesota Child and Dependent Care Credit, Minnesota Department of Revenue
In March 2015 the first Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) was delivered to Congress. MIHOPE is a congressionally mandated evaluation of the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV). The initial report provides an evaluation of states’ needs assessments and implementation process of MIECHV. According to MIHOPE’s evaluations, states were successful in identifying at-risk communities to target MIECHV funding. Future reports will focus more on program implementation and outcomes of the established home visiting programs.
MIHOPE is a scientifically rigorous evaluation of MIECHV completed by the federal Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation. The initial evaluation included 88 programs in 12 different states—California, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Washington and Wisconsin.
The MIECHV legislation required states to assess geographic areas within their state that would benefit from home visiting, as indicated by high numbers of premature births, school dropouts, substance abuse, domestic violence, child maltreatment, and unemployment. MIHOPE findings included:
If you are interested the full report is available to read or print.
The wait is over! Registration for the 2015 NCSL Legislative Summit is now open. Join thousands of legislators and legislative staff Aug. 3-6 in Seattle.
At the Legislative Summit you’ll find:
Be sure mark your calendar and attend the Wednesday, Aug. 5 session Beating the Odds: Tapping Brain Potential from 2-4:30 p.m. Kids become adults and then run the world. If they have brilliant brains—because we’ve invested in them early on—we can move from preschool to prosperity as a nation. Scientific and economic research shows that directing money into the health and education of children when they’re very young can solve some of our most intractable problems. What you'll learn:
This multi-hour, deep dive session, will give you an opportunity to learn from Deborah Phillips, Georgetown University; Rob Grunewald, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; a pediatrician from the America Academy of Pediatrics, Representative Ruth Kagi and Senator Steve Litzow from Washington state, as well as network with colleagues from around the country.
Source: National Women’s Law Center (NWLC)—December 2014
The National Women's Law Center's 11th annual review of key child care subsidy policies in all 50 states and the District of Columbia reveals that in 2014, families were worse off in 13 states—but better off in 33 states—than they were in 2013 under one or more child care assistance policies. These 51 fact sheets summarize the state-specific information in Turning the Corner: State Child Care Assistance Policies 2014. View the fact sheets.
ource: Early Childhood Data Collaborative—March 2015
This brief from the Early Childhood Data Collaborative examines the actions some states have taken in linking Head Start data to other state systems. It describes the importance of including Head Start data in a coordinated early care and education data system, relays what we learned about current data linkage steps across states, and presents action steps for state and federal leaders. Read the policy brief.
Source: CLASP & National Women’s Law Center (NWLC)—April 2015
In November 2014, with broad bipartisan support, Congress reauthorized CCDBG (the major federal child care program) for the first time since 1996. The new law strengthens CCDBG’s dual role as a major early childhood education program and a work support for low-income families. This implementation guide is designed to help policymakers and advocates gain a better understanding of what is entailed in fully implementing the law. It summarizes and analyzes key sections of the reauthorization, offering recommendations and areas of caution for states. It also includes a detailed chart comparing specific provisions of the new law with those of the previous law, an implementation timeline, a checklist indicating state compliance with select provisions of the law, a summary of the law and state-by-state information on CCDBG funding and children served. Read the implementation guide.
Source: National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER)—May 2015
The 2014 State Preschool Yearbook is the newest edition of NIEER’s annual report profiling state-funded prekindergarten programs in the United States. This latest Yearbook presents data on state-funded prekindergarten during the 2013-2014 school year as well as documenting more than a decade of change. This is the second year in a row that state pre-K has seen a real funding increase. Read the 2014 Yearbook.
Source: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)—January 2015
Read the brief.
Source: National Research Center on Hispanic Children & Families—January 2015
Read the report.
Source: Institute for Child Success—January 2015
Download and read the report.
Source: Institute for Child Success—February 2015
Download and read the report.
Source: New America—February 2015
Read the policy brief.
Source: Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP)—February 2015
Read the report.
Source: Child Trends/Trend Lines Blog—March 2015
Read the blog post.
Source: Child Trends—March 2015
Read the report.
Source: American Enterprise Institute—March 2015
Read the publication.
Source: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) and National Research Council (NRC)—April 2015
Read the report.
Source: ZERO TO THREE—April 2015
Read the brief. Additional information on how states are carrying out the strategies described in this paper and others that impact infants, toddlers, and their families can be found in ZERO TO THREE’s Baby Matters Database: A Gateway to State Policies and Initiatives.