Federal Action and Resources
Policymakers and institutions at the local, state and federal levels play a role in promoting healthy pregnancies overall and addressing disparities in maternity care.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) added the Women’s Health Amendment to the Public Health Service Act, requiring health insurance plans to cover women’s health preventive services, including prenatal care, without cost sharing. These pre-pregnancy and prenatal preventive services include folic acid supplements, expanded tobacco intervention, counseling and screening for a number of conditions, such as anemia, gestational diabetes and preeclampsia.
In 2018, Congress passed H.R. 315, the Improving Access to Maternity Care Act. This law required HRSA to identify, collect and publish data around maternity care health professional target areas to address provider shortages.
Federal health agencies such as the Office on Women’s Health (OWH), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and HRSA’s Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) also play a vital role in promoting healthy pregnancies.
OWH has an information hub that provides health information for women across numerous topic areas and has a robust section on pregnancy and prenatal care.
CDC provides data, research, preventive care guidelines and recommendations. For example, the CDC conducts national surveillance of pregnancy-related deaths by reviewing copies of death certificates for women who died during pregnancy or within one year of pregnancy from 52 jurisdictions (50 states, New York City and Washington, D.C.). This data helps the public and health professionals understand the causes and trends of maternal death.
The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), a joint surveillance and data collection project between the CDC and state health departments, is a key tool for states to improve the health of mothers and infants by reducing adverse outcomes. Forty-seven states participate in PRAMS, along with New York City, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia and the Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Health Board. PRAMS participants represent about 83% of all U.S. births.
PRAMS collects state-specific, population-based data used by researchers to study emerging maternal health issues. State and local governments use this data to plan programs and policies. For example, Minnesota lawmakers reviewed PRAMS data before passing SB 699, which approved Medicaid payment for doula services. The state used PRAMS data to better understand how doula services could be targeted to rural and underserved women, particularly to improve prenatal care to American Indian mothers.
HRSA’s MCHB plays a large role in bolstering perinatal—the period between 22 weeks gestation and seven days postpartum—care by administering programs, supporting research and investing in workforce training to improve the health and well-being of mothers and infants. Among other programs and initiatives, MCHB administers the Title V Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant, providing funding to 59 states and jurisdictions. Title V is one of the largest federal block grant programs and provides support for health programs benefitting 92% of all pregnant women. This interactive webpage shows the contact information for each state’s Maternal and Child Health director as well as national Title V data. Data available include maps that show the number of states reporting on different measures such as risk-appropriate perinatal care. Individual state profiles also summarize each state’s selected priorities and outcomes such as rates of early prenatal care and low birth weight.
HRSA’s State Maternal Health Innovation Program also funds nine states to strengthen their capacity to address disparities in maternal health and improve maternal health outcomes. For example, each funded state established a Maternal Health Task Force to create and implement a strategic plan that translates recommendations on addressing maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity from ideas into action. In addition, the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health, or AIM program, assists state-based teams in implementing evidence-based maternal safety bundles within hospitals and other types of birthing facilities to improve patient outcomes and reduce maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity.
State Strategies to Ensure Healthy Pregnancies
With the help of tools such as PRAMS and HRSA-funded programs, states have implemented several strategies to improve maternity care overall and address disparities. These strategies include those that directly and indirectly address prenatal care. They include efforts to expand access to different types of providers, care settings and coverage options, as well as those related to improving the quality of care.
Workforce and Access to Services
Barriers to accessing maternity care affect women’s ability to receive timely and adequate prenatal care. These barriers include finding a trusted provider the woman can communicate with, accessing the location where maternity services are provided and having insurance coverage for services.
There are several reasons women choose to seek prenatal care with different types of providers, such as pregnancy risk level, proximity to the provider, insurance coverage or trust. While pregnant women typically receive prenatal care from obstetricians, family practice physicians or certified nurse-midwives (providers with medical training), some states have expanded access to additional provider types, care settings and models of care to increase prenatal care visits and improve birth outcomes.
Community Health Workers
State or community-based programs may employ community health workers (CHWs) to improve access to health care services and promote health in high-risk communities. CHWs work to address many health concerns, particularly those related to chronic diseases, and are a recommended model of care to reach high-risk women in low-income communities, rural communities and communities of color. CHWs typically live in the communities in which they work and provide support in women’s homes or neighborhoods. As trusted members of the community who generally share the same language and culture, CHWs can help women navigate pregnancy and provide prenatal education, emotional support and care coordination.
Almost all states have laws or administrative policies addressing the CHW workforce, and oversight and development of state CHW programs typically fall under the purview of state health departments. For example, Illinois enacted a bill in 2014 creating the Community Health Worker Advisory Board under the department of public health. With CHWs included as members, the board was tasked with summarizing best practices, curriculum and training programs for a CHW certification program as well as summarizing recommendations for reimbursement and securing funding. In 2011, the Texas Legislature established an advisory committee and commissioned a study to maximize access to CHWs and to explore public and private funding sources. Texas statute provides authority to operate the CHW training and certification program to the department of health, which continues to oversee the state’s CHW workforce.
Some states also increased access to doula care to provide supplemental support for pregnant women.
Doulas are professional labor assistants who provide physical and emotional support during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Doulas do not provide medical care or deliver the baby. Some studies have shown that continuous support from doulas during childbirth may be associated with decreased use of pain relief medication during labor, decreased incidence of cesarean deliveries, decreased length of labor and decreased negative childbirth experiences, particularly for Black women.
At least 20 states recently introduced and several passed legislation related to doula care. For example, Virginia passed legislation in 2020 related to doula certification and Indiana passed legislation in 2019 providing that Medicaid pregnancy services may include reimbursement for doula services.
The New York State Health Department launched a pilot program in 2019 to expand Medicaid coverage for doula services in parts of the state with high rates of maternal and infant mortality. The doula pilot is part of Governor Cuomo’s initiative to reduce maternal mortality and racial disparities in birth outcomes.
In some cases, women choose midwives for prenatal care and delivery support—seeking a holistic philosophy of care, often with fewer medications, lower cost and greater convenience. Midwives include a range of professionally trained providers who support women to maintain healthy pregnancies and have optimal births, such as certified professional midwives and direct entry midwives. This may also be appealing for women with low-risk pregnancies who lack access and transportation to obstetric hospitals. Most states regulate midwives through licensure or certification, but several states do not regulate midwives or allow direct entry midwives to practice.
Oklahoma and the District of Columbia recently provided licensure for midwives to ensure quality and accountability while allowing pregnant women expanded options for prenatal care and delivery.
One key strategy to reduce access barriers and provide additional support to populations with a higher burden of adverse pregnancy outcomes is through home visiting programs. The federally funded Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program funds states and territories to develop evidence-based home visiting programs to support pregnant women and parents with young children up to kindergarten entry. These programs are voluntary and are commonly led by nurses, social workers or other trained professionals. Home visiting improves maternal and child health and has been shown to reduce infant mortality, preterm births and emergency room visits.
New Jersey passed legislation in 2016 establishing a three-year Medicaid home visitation demonstration project to provide information, support and essential referrals to health and social services during pregnancy, infancy and early childhood.
Colorado’s Prenatal Plus program also serves the state’s Medicaid members, matching high-risk pregnant women with a team that helps them maintain regular prenatal care as well as obtain additional support, such as nutrition counseling, mental health services and coordinated care. The program was found to be successful in lowering the rate of low birth weight infants—babies born to program participants had a low birth weight rate 22.5% lower than the expected rate for women without Prenatal Plus services.
South Carolina’s Nurse-Family Partnership, funded in part by Medicaid, is the nation’s first maternal and child health home visiting program to use a pay-for-success model. Under this financing system, funders provide upfront capital to expand social services and the state pays for all or part of the program if it measurably improves the lives of participants, as evaluated by an independent party. South Carolina’s program pairs low-income, first-time pregnant women with a home visiting registered nurse to improve pregnancy outcomes, among other goals. The program aims to reduce disparities by income and race; most of the women served are women of color. The program reported successful outcomes, with 90% of babies born full term and 89% of babies born at a healthy weight.
In 2018, Utah created a pay-for-success nurse home visiting pilot program within the department of health. The state will pay back investors once specific outcomes are achieved, such as postpartum depression screening and lower rates of preterm birth.
Other Innovative Programs and Models of Care
States have found innovative ways to reduce barriers to quality prenatal care. Texas established the Medicaid Medical Transportation Program, requiring the maternal mortality and morbidity task force to establish a pilot program for providing medical transportation services to pregnant women and new mothers.
California passed the Dignity in Pregnancy and Childbirth Act in 2019, which made legislative findings relating to implicit bias and racial disparities in maternal mortality rates. The law also requires hospitals and alternative birth centers to implement an implicit bias program for all perinatal health care providers within those facilities.
Implicit bias training is emerging as a state strategy to address racial disparities in perinatal care and birth outcomes. Maryland required the state’s Cultural and Linguistic Health Care Professional Competency Program to establish and provide an evidence-based implicit bias training program for perinatal health care professionals. The bill also requires certain health care professionals to complete the training on or before Jan. 1, 2022. Illinois directed the department of public health to develop best practices for implicit bias training and education in cultural competency for birthing facilities.
Many states have a Healthy Start program or coalition, which is funded by HRSA and administered by states and communities. Healthy Start programs aim to reduce infant mortality rates, increase access to early prenatal care and remove barriers to health care access. Florida’s Healthy Start program was created legislatively in 1991 and screens all pregnant women to identify those at risk of poor birth and health outcomes. The program offers care coordination and education on prenatal care, parenting, interconception care—the time between pregnancies—and stress management.
Medical practices in at least 46 states have adopted the Centering Pregnancy model, an innovative model of care that uses group prenatal care to bring together expectant mothers for a series of enhanced prenatal visits. In addition to medical care, participating women receive guidance about nutrition, breastfeeding, labor and delivery. The program also builds community and peer support. Where implemented, Centering Pregnancy can decrease the rate of preterm and low-weight births, reducing costly neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions; increase mothers’ engagement in their own care; and reduce racial disparities in preterm birth.
Providing services through telehealth is another innovative approach states employ to address access to care, particularly in rural areas. Arkansas and Virginia operate telehealth programs for high-risk pregnant women. These programs consist of video conferencing with maternal and fetal medicine specialists, and each have demonstrated significant outcome improvements, such as fewer deliveries of very low birth weight infants and shorter stays in NICUs.
COVID-19 May Change Prenatal Care Delivery Beyond the Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic caused major disruptions in routine and preventive care access, including for pregnant women, particularly during the early months of the outbreak. Health care providers limited in-person appointments to reduce the spread of the virus and patients avoided health care facilities for fear of infection.
Pregnant women may be at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 as well as other adverse outcomes such as preterm birth. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that pregnant women take additional precautions to avoid infection.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists emphasized the importance of keeping all prenatal care appointments, although in-person visits may be fewer or farther in between. Tests and procedures that were typically more spread out or conducted over separate visits may be condensed into fewer in-person visits and other care and consultation provided by phone or online.
State efforts to expand telehealth coverage and access during the pandemic have allowed pregnant women to continue care, with many providers considering a permanent shift in prenatal care practice. For example, providers at Michigan Medicine have adjusted to only a handful of in-person visits, with all others going virtual. They also indicated that their revised schedule may be appropriate for low-risk pregnancies beyond the pandemic, particularly if patients have basic vitals monitoring devices at home.
Coverage is a key factor in pregnant women receiving early prenatal care, as illustrated in Figure 7. At least half of pregnant women are covered through private insurance plans. The ACA requires health insurance plans to provide women’s preventive health services with no cost sharing. Essentially, pregnant women covered by private and public insurance have access to prenatal care services. While 3% of women reported being uninsured at delivery, nearly one in five women reported being uninsured the month before pregnancy. Pregnant women who are uninsured are less likely to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester than those covered by Medicaid and private insurance.
Medicaid is the single largest payer of maternity-related services, covering about 43% of all U.S. births. Medicaid also covers a greater share of births in rural areas; among women with lower levels of educational attainment; among girls under 19; and among Hispanic, Black and American Indian/Alaska Native women. Due to Medicaid’s role in covering births among populations with higher risk for pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes, Medicaid can be one lever to address pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality as well as disparities in birth outcomes by ensuring coverage and access to preventive services.
Federal regulations allow states to cover pregnant women under the Medicaid state plan up to either 185% of the federal poverty level (FPL) or the highest income level in effect prior to transitioning to new income eligibility standards established by the ACA. Medicaid is required to provide coverage through 60 days postpartum.
Many states provide coverage for pregnant women up to 250% FPL, with a few covering over 300% FPL (for example, Wisconsin and Iowa) through Section 1115 waivers. These waivers can be an option to design programs to meet states’ unique needs, such as increasing eligibility limits if a state is already at its maximum under the Medicaid State Plan (as long as the waivers are cost-neutral to the federal government).
Presumptive eligibility is another option for states to provide Medicaid coverage for pregnant women. It eliminates the waiting period for determining eligibility and provides women immediate access to prenatal care. States have the option of authorizing qualified entities to enroll individuals through presumptive eligibility, such as certain health care and social service providers. Currently, at least 30 states allow presumptive eligibility for pregnant women.
Another option to address coverage and outcomes for women and infants is through Medicaid expansion. Women in states that have expanded Medicaid are more likely to have health coverage prior to and during the early months of pregnancy, and are more likely to start prenatal care early. Researchers also found that, overall, states that have expanded Medicaid have lower maternal and infant mortality rates, particularly among Black infants, compared to those that have not.
The Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provides additional options for states to cover pregnant women. States may not cover pregnant women at a higher income standard than the standard established for children. Colorado and Missouri are among states that currently offer coverage options for pregnant women through CHIP.
Data and Quality
State efforts to improve quality of prenatal care include those to establish perinatal quality collaboratives (PQCs), advisory councils or task forces. A common thread across these different teams is the reliance on data and targeted recommendations to improve outcomes for each state and community.
One of the most common examples of using data to improve quality of prenatal care is via perinatal quality collaboratives. PQCs identify health care processes that need to be improved and use quality improvement principles to address gaps in maternal and infant care, typically making changes as quickly as possible. PQCs often work to reduce preterm births, severe pregnancy complications related to high blood pressure and hemorrhage, cesarean births among low-risk pregnant women, and disparities by race and geography.
Almost all states have PQCs available or in development, as illustrated in Figure 8. Arkansas and Delaware have more recently established PQCs, and Illinois recently expanded the scope of its PQC to develop an initiative to reduce racial and ethnic disparities during the immediate periods before, during and after delivery. The Illinois law also aims to improve timely identification and consultation for pregnant women in birthing facilities, including allowing use of telemedicine for consultation. Finally, the law requires yearly education on severe maternal hypertension and obstetric hemorrhage management for obstetric providers.
Alabama’s PQC developed a Maternal Hypertension Initiative to establish protocols, processes and education to ensure providers quickly identify women with hypertension/preeclampsia and manage the condition before further complications arise.
States also set up advisory councils and task forces to improve the quality of perinatal care. Louisiana created the Healthy Moms, Healthy Babies Advisory Council within the Louisiana Department of Health. The legislation provided that the council, made up of experts and stakeholders committed to addressing racial and ethnic disparities in maternal health outcomes, will support the state PQC by incorporating a community-engaged approach to preventing maternal mortality and morbidity. Additionally, the legislation expanded public coverage options to provide access to provider services and other delivery-focused reforms that address maternal health outside the hospital setting.
Illinois created the Task Force on Infant and Maternal Mortality Among African Americans to establish best practices to decrease infant and maternal mortality among African Americans in Illinois. The task force’s duties include reviewing research to identify best practices and effective interventions for improving the quality and safety of maternity care, improving health outcomes during pregnancy, and addressing social determinants of health disparities in maternal and infant health outcomes.