Considerations for State Legislatures
To support disease forecasting and best practices in responding to outbreaks and epidemics, policymakers and other leaders may consider the following strategies.
Data Collection
Advanced and efficient data collection and sharing can help improve the accuracy and timeliness of forecasts and analytics. Federal efforts such as the CDC’s new Data Modernization Initiative are underway to modernize public health data systems.
In 2023, some states took actions to improve data collection and sharing, for example:
- Illinois H 2039 requires certain state departments to provide public health data on local communities to the relevant local public health agency, through data use agreements. Such data includes but is not limited to vital (birth and death) records, hospital discharge data, adverse pregnancy reports, cancer registries, syndromic surveillance and prescription monitoring data.
- Louisiana S 205 creates the Louisiana Foundational Integrated Research System for Transformation, or LA FIRST, to form data sharing agreements between state departments and requires reporting using a single data center.
- Nevada A 7 requires the state department of health and human services to adopt a framework for electronic transmittal of certain health information and requires government entities, health care facilities and insurers to exchange data.
Establishing Relationships
State legislatures can benefit from identifying reliable and reputable sources of disease forecasts and analytics prior to a public health crisis. State public health departments house experts who can help generate or interpret disease forecasts, outbreak analytics and other critical information for decision-makers.
Forming relationships with public health departments and other partner organizations prior to disease outbreaks can increase the efficiency and effectiveness of response efforts during an emergency. Forming ongoing relationships can also help establish appropriate contacts, increase understanding of roles and responsibilities and address barriers prior to an outbreak response.
Effective Communications
The pandemic created an opportunity for learning valuable lessons about communicating during an emergency. Understanding how people may perceive a risk can determine how a message is framed. For example, less acceptable risks are those perceived as being new, human-caused or having imposed action rather than choices. More acceptable risks are those that are familiar, naturally occurring and involving choices.
Uncertainty can lead to misinformation. Uncertainty exists when the details of situations are ambiguous, complex or unpredictable, and when people feel insecure about their state of knowledge. Communications that are transparent can help lessen misinformation and mistrust. While disease forecasts inherently involve some uncertainty, clearly explaining levels and types of uncertainty can help build trust and reduce misinformation.
Federal and National Action
During the pandemic, the CDC recognized the need for more tools and experts on disease forecasting and created a new center devoted to addressing such needs. The Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics was established in 2021 to use data, modeling and analytics to respond to outbreaks in real time and drive effective decision-making during outbreak responses.
To help build capacity to fulfill its mission, the center is bringing together academic, private and public partners to innovate, integrate and implement disease outbreak tools for use by state and local decision-makers. Insight Net is a network of partners established to improve the timeliness, accuracy and use of data during public health emergencies. The network uses a hub-and-spoke model with 13 primary partners that work with more than 100 state, local, academic, public and private partners across the U.S.
National organizations are also building capacity on disease forecasting and outbreak analytics and can facilitate connections. For example, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, the National Association of County and City Health Officials and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists can help policymakers connect with state and local public health officials and epidemiologists.
Contributor: Eighmey Zeeck, consultant, Silver Linings Public Health Consulting.
This project is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as part of a financial assistance award totaling $295,000 with 100% funded by CDC/HHS. The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement by, CDC/HHS or the U.S. government.