The NCSL Blog


By Lisa Soronen

The U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust is narrow, precise and unanimous.

The Supreme CourtThe presence of in-state beneficiaries alone does not allow a state to tax undistributed trust income where the beneficiaries have no right to demand that income and may never receive it.

The Kimberley Rice Kaestner trust is governed by New York law and its trustee is a New York resident who has “absolute discretion” to distribute the trust. When the trustees, Kimberley Rice Kaestner and her children, lived in North Carolina the state taxed the income of the trust even though no funds were distributed during the time period.

The trust sued North Carolina seeking the $1.3 million it paid in taxes. The trust argued that the tax violated the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. 

The Supreme Court has held that for a state tax to comply with the Due Process Clause there must be some “minimum connection” between the state and the person or property the state seeks to tax.

The Supreme Court agreed with the trust that North Carolina lacked a sufficient minimum connection with the trust, based solely on the beneficiaries' in-state residence, to tax its undistributed income.

Writing for the court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted that “when a tax is premised on the in-state residence of a beneficiary, the Constitution requires that the resident have some degree of possession, control, or enjoyment of the trust property or a right to receive that property before the state can tax the asset.”

Here, the beneficiaries received no income from the trust, had no right to demand trust income, and could not necessarily count on receiving funds from the trust in the future.

According to an amicus brief filed by Minnesota and 20 other states, the “majority of states (27) provide for some form of trust income taxation based on either the location of the beneficiary or the location of the grantor.” These states should determine if their law needs to be modified in light of this case.

Lisa Soronen is executive director of the State and Local Legal Center and a regular contributor to the NCSL Blog on judicial issues.

Actions: E-mail | Permalink |

Subscribe to the NCSL Blog

Click on the RSS feed at left to add the NCSL Blog to your favorite RSS reader. 

About the NCSL Blog

This blog offers updates on the National Conference of State Legislatures' research and training, the latest on federalism and the state legislative institution, and posts about state legislators and legislative staff. The blog is edited by NCSL staff and written primarily by NCSL's experts on public policy and the state legislative institution.