The NCSL Blog


By Lisa Soronen

While President Donald Trump’s executive order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth merely calls for the “review” of the Clean Power Plan, it has been widely viewed as the president’s first step to dismantle President Obama’s signature climate change measure.

smokestackThe executive order goes on to say that, after review, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “if appropriate, shall, as soon as practicable, suspend, revise, or rescind the guidance, or publish for notice and comment proposed rules suspending, revising, or rescinding those rules.”

Under the Clean Power Plan, by 2030 carbon pollution from the power sector is supposed to be 32 percent below 2005 levels. State-by-state targets are to be accomplished by increased production of renewable energy.

A number of states sued the Obama administration claiming the plan regulations exceeded EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act. In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court prevented the plan regulations from going into effect until the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals—and the Supreme Court if it chooses to—rules on the regulations.

In September 2016, the entire D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in West Virginia v. EPA. It has yet to issue an opinion in this case.

The Trump administration has asked the D.C. Circuit to hold the case in abeyance while EPA engages in rulemaking. The motion argues abeyance “avoid[s] unnecessary adjudication, support[s] the integrity of the administrative process, and ensure[s] due respect for the prerogative of the executive branch to reconsider the policy decisions of a prior administration.”

The D.C. Circuit is more likely to agree to the motion if all parties involved agree with it. Almost all interveners supporting the CPP, which include numerous states and local governments, want the litigation over the current CPP regulations to continue and will oppose the motion.

If the D.C. Circuit grants the Trump administration’s motion, the practical effect is the current plan would no longer be valid. If it does not, the litigation over will continue. No matter who wins West Virginia v. EPA, assuming the abeyance motion is denied, the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court, which may or may not agree to hear it.

Meanwhile, a new version of the Clean Power Plan will be working its way through the Administrative Procedure Act's lengthy notice and comment process. It, too, will likely be ultimately litigated regardless of the fate of the current plan. 

Lisa Soronen is executive director of the State and Local Legal Center and a frequent contributor to the NCSL Blog on judicial matters.

Actions: E-mail | Permalink |

Subscribe to the NCSL Blog

Click on the RSS feed at left to add the NCSL Blog to your favorite RSS reader. 

About the NCSL Blog

This blog offers updates on the National Conference of State Legislatures' research and training, the latest on federalism and the state legislative institution, and posts about state legislators and legislative staff. The blog is edited by NCSL staff and written primarily by NCSL's experts on public policy and the state legislative institution.