The NCSL Blog


By Lisa Soronen

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association could have turned public sector labor law upside down.

IRebecca Friedrichs, a veteran Orange County public school teacher, sued to challenge the mandatory fees paid to the California Teachers Assn. (Greg Schneider / Associated Press)n an unsurprising move the U.S. Supreme Court issued a non-precedential 4-4 opinion affirming the lower court’s decision by an equally divided court. This opinion continues the status quo. Had Justice Antonin Scalia not died in February this case almost certainly would have had a different outcome.

In Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association the court was contemplating overruling a nearly 40-year old precedent requiring public sector employees who don’t join the union to pay their “fair share” of collective bargaining costs. More than 20 states have enacted statutes authorizing fair share.

In Abood the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment does not prevent “agency shop” arrangements where public employees who do not join the union are still required to pay their “fair share” of union dues for collective-bargaining, contract administration, and grievance-adjustment. The rationale for an agency fee is that the union may not discriminate between members and nonmembers in performing these functions. So no free-riders are allowed.

In two recent cases—Knox v. SEIU (2012) and Harris v. Quinn (2014)—in 5-4 opinions written by Justice Samuel Alito and joined by the other conservative justices (including Scalia) and Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court was very critical of Abood.

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case in January and the five more conservative justices seemed poised to overrule Abood.  After Scalia died, the court had two choices knowing it was divided 4-4: Wait for a ninth justice to join the court and rehear the case or do what it did—affirm the lower court’s decision.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a very brief opinion had refused to overrule Abood.

Given the uncertainty of when a new justice will be confirmed and the lack of a circuit split on this issue, the court’s decision was expected. If a more liberal justice joins the court it is unlikely this issue will be brought before the court again anytime soon. 

Lisa Soronen is the executive director of the State and Local Legal Center and writes frequently for the NCSL blog about the U.S. Supreme Court.


Actions: E-mail | Permalink |

Subscribe to the NCSL Blog

Click on the RSS feed at left to add the NCSL Blog to your favorite RSS reader. 

About the NCSL Blog

This blog offers updates on the National Conference of State Legislatures' research and training, the latest on federalism and the state legislative institution, and posts about state legislators and legislative staff. The blog is edited by NCSL staff and written primarily by NCSL's experts on public policy and the state legislative institution.