The NCSL Blog

25

By Lisa Soronen

Third time is the charm for the Affordable Care Act. King v. Burwell is the first complete victory for the law.

In a 6-3 decision the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that health insurance tax credits are available on the 34 federal exchanges. The court’s opinion focused largely on the consequences of ruling to the contrary:  the destruction of health insurance markets.

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, began his opinion by pointing out that the Affordable Care Act relies on three reforms:

  • Making sure health insurance is available to everyone regardless of their heath and not charging higher premiums depending on health.
  • Requiring everyone to be insured.
  • Offering tax credits to people with low-incomes so they can afford insurance.

If only the first two reforms were implemented, a well-documented economic “death spiral” occurs, where health insurance premiums skyrocket, because only the sick buy insurance.

The ACA allows the states and the federal government to sell insurance on health care exchanges. The ACA states that tax credits are available when insurance is purchased through “an Exchange established by the State.”

So the technical legal question in this case was whether a federal exchange is “an Exchange established by the State” that may offer tax credits.

The Supreme Court said yes.

The court first concluded that the above language is ambiguous. But by looking at it in the context of the entire statute, the meaning of the language became clearer. Specifically, if tax credits weren’t available on federal exchanges “it would destabilize the individual insurance market in any state with a federal exchange and likely create the very ‘death spirals’ that Congress designed the act to avoid.”

The chief justice’s analysis is simple and pragmatic:

"Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them. If at all possible, we must interpret the act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter. [The statutory language at issue] can fairly be read consistent with what we see as Congress’s plan, and that is the reading we adopt."

As a result of this decision, the status quo remains. If an individual otherwise eligible for a tax credit buys health insurance on a state exchange or a federal exchange, the tax credit will be available.

Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion. Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito dissented.

See NCSL’s resources related to health insurance exchanges. 

Lisa Soronen is the executive director of the State and Local Legal Center and writes frequently for the NCSL blog about the U.S. Supreme Court.

Posted in: Public Policy
Actions: E-mail | Permalink |

Subscribe to the NCSL Blog

Click on the RSS feed at left to add the NCSL Blog to your favorite RSS reader. 

About the NCSL Blog

This blog offers updates on the National Conference of State Legislatures' research and training, the latest on federalism and the state legislative institution, and posts about state legislators and legislative staff. The blog is edited by NCSL staff and written primarily by NCSL's experts on public policy and the state legislative institution.