|
|
Home | Contact Us | Press Room | Site Overview | Help | Login | Register |
![]() |
![]() |
| About NCSL | State & Federal Issues | Legislatures | Legislative Staff | Meetings | Bookstore | Legislators & Staff Only |
| NCSL Home > State & Federal Issues: State-Federal Relations > | Add to MyNCSL |
Environment UpdateOctober 31, 2002
|
|
Appropriations Bill |
House Committee |
House Floor |
Senate Committee |
Senate Floor |
|
VA-HUD (H.R. 5605/S. 2797) |
Passed Oct. 9 |
— |
Passed July 25 |
— |
|
Energy and Water |
Passed Sept. 5 |
— |
Passed July 24 |
— |
|
Interior |
Passed July 9 |
Passed July 17 |
Passed June 27 |
— |
EPA FY 2003 Appropriations
Table 2.
Select EPA Funding
(Amounts in millions of dollars)
|
Program |
FY'02 Enacted |
FY'03 Pres. Request |
Senate Committee (S. 2797) |
House Committee (H.R. 5605) |
|
Superfund |
$1,270 |
$1,272 |
$1,272 |
$1,423 |
|
Brownfields |
$98 |
$200 |
$200 |
$200 |
|
Clean Water State Revolving Loan |
$1,350 |
$1,212 |
$1,450 |
$1,300 |
|
Drinking Water State Revolving Loan |
$850 |
$850 |
$875 |
$850 |
Clean Air Act Reauthorization Debate Gets Set for Next Year
On October 17, 2002, Senators Tom Carper (D-Del.), Lincoln Chafee (R- RI), John Breaux (D- La.) and Max Baucus (D- Mo.) introduced the Clean Air Planning Act of 2002 (CAP 2002)(S. 3135). CAP 2002 proposes a phased-in market-based cap-and-trade program for SO2, NOx, Mercury, and CO2, with caps on CO2 set at levels "…that do not require reductions in emissions that might impede economic growth," according to a statement issued by Carper’s office. The bill could jumpstart a debate that has been gridlocked between Senator Jeffords' S. 556 and the Bush administration's Clear Skies Initiative. Senator Carper commented that the bill is a centrist multi-pollutant bill, which would impose
For more information on the Clear Skies Initiative and S. 556 refer to Environment Update Volume III, Numbers 5 and 6 at
http://www.ncsl.org/statefed/EvUMenu.htm.
Water Infrastructure Security
On October 16, 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released "Security Checklist Suggestions" to help aid water utilities in security vulnerability assessments. The vulnerability assessments were recently mandated by bioterrorism legislation signed in June. The legislation requires water utilities that serve between 3,300 and 50,000 people to conduct a vulnerability assessment and to prepare or revise an emergency response plan within six months of the vulnerability assessment. Water utilities were using a vulnerability assessment checklist developed jointly by the National Rural Water Association (NRWA) and the Association of State Drinking Water Administrators (ASDWA). In September, the EPA issued a guidance letter outlining six basic elements to identify in these vulnerability assessments. The EPA's basic elements caused confusion among water utilities, and many feared the confusion would cause delay in vulnerability assessments. The EPA responded by issuing suggestions to the NRWA/ASDWA vulnerability assessment checklist, that would align it with EPA's six basic elements. The NWRA has issued a statement saying that the clarification by EPA should limit the current delay in completing assessments. The checklist suggestions can be obtained at
Wastewater Security
On September 5, 2002, the House approved The Wastewater Treatment Works Security Act (H.R. 5169), which authorizes $220 million in grants to assess security enhancements in public water treatment facilities. On October 3, 2002, Chairman James Jeffords (I-Vt.) of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee introduced a similar bill (S. 3037) that authorizes nearly $200 million in water security grants. The House version of the bill would make the vulnerability assessments voluntary while the Senate version would make the assessments mandatory. Unlike the House bill, the Senate bill would require the wastewater industry to complete emergency response plans within 180 days of an assessment's completion. It is unlikely the Senate will address this issue before next year.
Note: EPA has received supplemental appropriations from Congress this fiscal year, to support counter terrorism activities at drinking water and wastewater utilities. More information can be obtained at
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/security/#vulnerability.
Energy Conference Update
Price-Anderson Act: The nuclear insurance plan for nuclear power plants was reauthorized (lapsed on Aug. 1, 2002) until 2017. The conference-approved Price-Anderson provision closely resembles the Senate's energy bill version. The House conferees voiced complaints the conference-approved provision does not improve current nuclear security regulations.
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE): The fuel economy standard will be tightened by National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration (NHTSA) to conserve 5 billion gallons of oil by 2014, a slight change from the House provision. Opponents of the provision argued the language does not go far enough. The new standard will increase the current fuel economy by less than 1 mile per gallon. Energy Conference Chairman Billy Tauzin (R-Louisiana) praised the provision, claiming it is the first time Congress has increased fuel economy standards for sport utility vehicles. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta sent a letter last month to the energy conferees expressing disappointment that the compromise did not include language that would require NHTSA to consider the element of safety when revising CAFE standards in the future.
Unresolved Issues: Congressional staff will continue to meet during the recess to discuss counterproposals for the more contentious issues in the energy package. The Senate is now working through House proposals on drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), electricity restructuring and ethanol use. Other controversial issues such as energy taxes, renewable portfolio standard, climate change and a pipeline to Alaska's North Slope will probably not be addressed until deals on ANWR, electricity restructuring and ethanol are struck. Congress will attempt to resolve the following issues when they return to Washington in mid-November:
Ethanol/MTBE: The latest proposal includes a House provision to require the production of 5 billion gallons of ethanol by 2012 but strikes Senate language that would ban MTBE. The House opposes the Senate's MTBE ban and ethanol mandate and argues the U.S. is not capable of producing the amount that would be required to replace MTBE. The compromise also includes a House provision that would ensure the increased use of ethanol would not result in revenue short falls in the Highway Trust Fund. The Senate-passed energy bill includes an elimination of the Clean Air Act 2-percent oxygenate mandate.
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR): The majority of energy conference news has focused on ANWR negotiations. The House proposal would permit oil production on the refuge within a surface impact of 2000 acres or less and would add 10.2 million acres to the wilderness refuge area. The impact area does not include exploration activity or above ground pipelines. House Republicans have said they would accept climate change provisions as a compromise for ANWR passage, but the House Republicans defeated (by a vote of 15-2) a Senate Democrat climate change provision compromise on October 3, 2002.
Electricity Restructuring: The Republican House conferees offered Senate conferees an electricity restructuring proposal drafted by Representative Joe Barton (R-Texas). Rep. Barton's proposal includes voluntary regional transmission organization (RTO), a repeal of the Public Utility Holding Companies Act and an increase of net metering for renewable energy sources. A controversial issue is a renewable energy provision requiring an increase in the amount of electricity produced from renewable resources over the next two decades. The Senate-passed version of the energy bill includes a provision that would require each state to incrementally increase between 2005 and 2020 the amount of electricity produced from renewable sources to 10 percent of the state's electricity production. Chairman Tauzin voiced concern because the provision "preempts state programs" and because, he claimed, the average cost of renewable power is higher, thereby raising the average cost of power. Barton's provision was passed narrowly, but the Senate is not expected to approve the measure.
Energy Tax Incentives: Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) stated that the administration has voiced approval of the conference-proposed $15 billion in energy tax incentives — similar to the Senate proposal, but well below the House bill's energy tax incentive package.
President Bush has stressed to Congress that the completion of an energy package before the end of the session is a top priority for the administration.
NCSL Contacts:
Molly Stauffer
Committee Director
(202) 624-3584
Laurie Holmes
Committee Assistant
(202)624-8695
© 2008 National Conference of State Legislatures, All Rights Reserved
Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001