Back 

State Immigration Legislation Report Dec 2011

Immigration Policy Report  

2011 Immigration-Related Laws and Resolutions in the States (Jan. 1–Dec. 7, 2011)

In 2011, state legislators introduced 1,607 bills and resolutions relating to immigrants and refugees in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. This is a significant increase compared with 2010, when 46 states considered more than 1,400 bills and resolutions pertaining to immigrants. Even though more bills were introduced this year, however, 11 percent fewer were enacted. As of Dec. 7, 2011, 42 states and Puerto Rico had enacted 197 new laws and 109 new resolutions, for a total of 306. (See Table 1Fifteen additional bills passed but were vetoed by governors.

Five states—Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina and Utah—crafted omnibus laws following the example of Arizona’s 2010 bill, SB 1070. These laws include provisions that:  require law enforcement to attempt to determine the immigration status of a person involved in a lawful stop; allow state residents to sue state and local agencies for noncompliance with immigration enforcement; require E-Verify (an employment eligibility verification system); prohibit the harboring or transporting of unauthorized aliens; and make it a violation for failure to carry an alien registration document. Alabama’s HB 56 also requires schools to verify students’ immigration status, but the provision was enjoined by the U.S. District Court.

Court challenges based on preemption and civil rights have been filed against all five of these new state laws. Alabama’s HB 56, Georgia’s HB 87, Indiana’s SB 590 and Utah’s HB 497 have been enjoined; the challenge to South Carolina’s SB 20 was filed October 31, 2011.  The U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion for injunction of Alabama's law on August 1; on South Carolina's law on October 31; and Utah's law on November 22.  More information on these omnibus laws can be found under the omnibus category in this report and online. See also NCSL’s publications on Arizona's law and on omnibus bills in 2011

Utah took the immigration debate in a new direction, crafting a package of bills (HB 116, HB 466, HB 469 and HB 497) to support immigration enforcement and a legal immigrant workforce. Key provisions include:  seeking a federal waiver to obtain foreign workers; creating a multi-agency strike force to combat crimes associated with illegal immigration and human trafficking; creating an advisory commission on immigration and migration; requiring studies on the economic, legal, cultural and educational impact of immigration; and developing a state plan on immigration and integration. 

As in previous years, law enforcement, identification/driver’s licenses and employment remain the top issues addressed in state legislation related to immigrants. Alabama, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, South Dakota and Utah enacted sex offender registries that include a requirement of proof of citizenship or immigration documents. Montana now requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to use the SAVE program to verify a driver's license or an ID applicant's lawful presence. Eleven states—Alabama, California, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia—enacted legislation on E-Verify. Florida added an E-Verify requirement by executive order. Seventeen states now have an E-Verify requirement. For more details, see NCSL’s E-Verify publication

In education, Connecticut and Maryland will permit unauthorized immigrant students to be eligible for in-state tuition. Twelve states now have enacted legislation that typically conditions eligibility for in-state tuition on attendance and graduation from a state high school and admission into a college. California now offers financial aid as well to unauthorized immigrants. See NCSL’s publication on in-state tuition

In the health and public benefits categories, California revised its Fostering Connections Act to include additional guidance on immigrant children in the care of Child Protective Services (CPS). Indiana established a county domestic violence fatality review team and provides migrant child care if domestic violence is found. Nevada and Connecticut created state health insurance exchanges and permit lawfully present immigrants to participate. California allows lawfully present immigrants to be eligible for Medicaid Coverage Expansion (MCE) and the Health Care Coverage Initiative (HCCI). 

Table 1. State legislation related to immigrants, 2005-2011

 

Year

Introduced

Passed Legislatures

Vetoed

Enacted

Resolutions

Total Laws & Resolutions

2005

300

45

6

39

0

39

2006

570

90

6

84

12

96

2007

1,562

252

12

240

50

290

2008

1,305

209

3

206

64

270

2009

1,500*

373

20

222

131

353

2010

1,400*

356

10

208

138

346

2011**

1,607

318

15

197

109

306

 

* 2009-2010 estimates

** As of Dec. 7, 2011

 

Summaries of all enacted laws and resolutions are available online sorted alphabetically by state and by category at: www.ncsl.org/programs/immig.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Methodology

This report summarizes laws and resolutions enacted between Jan. 1 and Dec. 7, 2011. Laws included in this overview address legal immigrants, migrant and seasonal workers, refugees or unauthorized immigrants. Terms used in this report by and large reflect those used in the state legislation. In some state legislative language, unauthorized immigrants are also described as “illegal immigrants” or “undocumented immigrants” or “aliens.” 

 

Laws and Resolutions on Immigration Passed by Legislatures in 2010 and 2011

  2010 2010 2011 2011

Main Sub-Topics

Number of

Laws Enacted

Number of States

Number of Laws Enacted (Vetoed)

Number of States

Budgets

49

29

19 (2)

15

Education

17

11

20 (1)

11

Employment

27

20

27 (3)

18

Health

17

13

23 (2)

15

Human Trafficking

8

8

5

5

ID/Driver's Licenses and Other Licenses

26

21

27

18

Law Enforcement

37

19

39 (5)

20

Miscellaneous

20

15

12 (1)

9

Omnibus/Multi-Issue Measures

2

1

6

5

Public Benefits

9

8

15 (1)

11

Voting

6

3

4

4

Total Enacted Laws

218

43

197 (15)

42 (& PR)

Resolutions

138

27

109

26

Total laws and resolutions passed/adopted by state legislatures

356

47

321

42 (& PR)

Vetoed by governors

10

2

15

8

Total enacted laws and adopted resolutions

346

 

306

 
 

Source: NCSL Immigrant Policy Project, 2011.  

The full report of state laws is available online by state and by category, and in a searchable database. The brief summary below describes the categories and provides examples of laws enacted in 2011.

The PDf of the full report is available here.  

BUDGETS (19 enacted, 2 vetoed)

Fifteen states passed 19 laws: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Vermont, Virginia and Washington. Two laws were vetoed in California and Minnesota. 

These laws typically appropriate funds for migrant health centers, education, law enforcement, refugee resettlement or naturalization assistance programs. 

Example: Virginia HB 1500 appropriates money for a multilingual outreach campaign to inform qualified aliens and their children, who are U.S. citizens, of their eligibility for federal food stamps and to ensure that they have access to benefits under the food stamp program. It also extends the State Plan for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) to aliens who qualify, if permitted by federal law. 

Example: Washington HB1087 requires that on Dec. 1, 2011, and annually thereafter, the Department of Social and Health Services report to the legislature on all sources of funding available for refugees and immigrants, as well as naturalization services, and the amounts expended by service type and funding source. It requires the annual report to include the number of clients served and any data on outcomes.

 

EDUCATION (20 enacted, 1 vetoed)

Eleven states enacted 20 laws: California, Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia. One law was vetoed in California. For more information, please see NCSL’s publication on instate tuition and unauthorized immigrant students

These laws generally address eligibility for in-state tuition and financial assistance. 

Example: Indiana HB1402 states that a person unlawfully present in the United States is ineligible to pay the resident tuition rate. 

Example: Maryland SB167 and Connecticut HB 6390 permit certain unauthorized immigrant students to be eligible for in-state tuition. 

Example:California AB 844, AB130 and AB131 allow unauthorized immigrant students to be eligible for financial aid.

 

EMPLOYMENT (27 enacted, 3 vetoed)

Seventeen states and Puerto Rico enacted 27 laws: California, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Nebraska, New Jersey, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Washington. Three laws were vetoed in California, Maine and New Jersey. 

Many of these laws provide employer sanctions for hiring unauthorized workers, set employment eligibility verification requirements, and define penalties. Some of these laws also address unemployment benefits and workers’ compensation.

Example : Mississippi SB 2238 limits public benefit payments to lawfully present individuals only.

Example: Virginia SB 1471 establishes the Interagency Migrant Worker Policy Committee to serve the interests of migrant and seasonal farm workers and employees.

 

Eleven states enacted E-Verify legislation: Alabama, California, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia. Florida mandated the use of E-Verify through an executive order. For additional information on E-Verify legislation, please see NCSL’s publication.

Example: California AB 1236 prohibits localities from mandating the use of E-Verify.

 

HEALTH (23 enacted, 2 vetoed)

Fifteen states enacted 23 laws: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Maryland, North Dakota, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, Texas, Vermont, and West Virginia. Two laws were vetoed in Minnesota and New Mexico. 

These laws generally address eligibility for health care benefits, health insurance exchanges, and licensing of health care professionals and interpreters. 

Example: Texas SB189 requires a licensed applicant who is not a U.S. citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States to present proof that he or she has practiced medicine or has signed an agreement to practice medicine as a condition of the license for at least three years in an area designated as a health professional shortage area or a medically underserved area by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 

Example: Nevada SB440 and Connecticut SB 921 create state health insurance exchanges and allow citizens and those who are lawfully present in the United States to participate in them. 

 

HUMAN TRAFFICKING (5 enacted)

Five states passed five laws: Georgia, Kansas, Massachusetts, Texas and Vermont. 

These laws add definitions relating to human trafficking, human smuggling and forced labor, create new state penalties and offer assistance to victims. 

Example: Georgia HB 200 addresses human trafficking, sexual servitude and their crimes and offenses. It sets the penalty for sex trafficking at imprisonment for not less than 10 nor more than 20 years and a fine not to exceed $100,000. Coercion includes disseminating information that would subject a person to criminal or immigration proceedings.  

Example: Missouri HB 214 allows victims of human trafficking to receive services that include English language instruction and language interpretation and translation services.

 

ID / DRIVER’S LICENSES AND OTHER LICENSES (27 enacted)

Eighteen states passed 27 laws: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, Virginia and Washington. 

These laws relate to documentation and eligibility requirements for IDs and driver’s licenses, professional licenses, and firearm and hunting/fishing licenses. 

Example: Arizona HB 2102 requires agencies to issue a license, fingerprint clearance card, or any state ID only to a person who provides photo ID proof of citizenship or alien status. 

Example: Montana HB178 requires that the DMV use the SAVE program to verify a driver's license or an ID applicant's lawful presence. 

Example: Michigan SB 494 allows legally present aliens to apply for an official state personal identification card.

 

LAW ENFORCEMENT (39 enacted, 5 vetoed)

Twenty states enacted 39 laws: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Washington. Five laws were vetoed in California, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico and Nevada. 

These laws generally deal with collaboration with federal law enforcement agencies, immigrant detention processes, bail determinations and law enforcement officer responsibilities. Alabama, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, South Dakota and Utah addressed sex offender registration, requiring proof of citizenship or immigration documents. 

Example: Arizona SB1406 allows the governor to enter a compact with other states to provide construction and maintenance for a secure fence along the Arizona-Mexico border. 

Example: New York SB 5672 requires a notary public who advertises services in a language other than English to state that they are not authorized to practice law and have no authority to give advice on immigration law or other legal matters. 

Example: Washington SB 5168 reduces the state’s maximum penalty for a gross misdemeanor to 364 days since the one-year sentence can result in the deportation of a legal immigrant, even if the sentence is suspended. The law attempts to correct the disproportionate punishment for those convicted of a felony sentence of less than one year.

 

MISCELLANEOUS (12 enacted, 1 vetoed)

Nine states enacted 12 laws: California, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Washington. One law was vetoed in Arizona. 

These laws address a variety of immigration issues like housing assistance, tax withholdings, and studies exploring the impact immigrants have on the state. 

Example: Utah HB 466 requires the development for a state plan on the integration of immigrants, creates the Migrant Worker Visa Pilot Program and commissions a study of the impact of illegal immigration on the state.

 

OMNIBUS / MULTI-ISSUE LEGISLATION (6 enacted)

Five states enacted six comprehensive laws: Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina and Utah. 

Omnibus bills include several topics in one bill such as immigration law enforcement, employment verification, human trafficking and verification of lawful status for public benefits.  

For additional information, please see NCSL’s publication on omnibus laws.

 

PUBLIC BENEFITS (15 enacted, 1 vetoed)

Eleven states enacted 15 new laws: California, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. One law was vetoed in Montana. 

These laws relate to eligibility and verification of immigration status for public benefits, such as requiring proof of lawful presence in the United States or extending benefits for certain refugee or immigrant populations. Some require state agencies to use certain eligibility verification systems or to deny public benefits to unauthorized immigrants. Some make funds available for certain immigrants and refugees. 

Example: Montana HB 638 allows the state to deny services to an illegal alien to the extent allowed by federal laws and the state constitution. It requires a person seeking a state service to provide proof of U.S. citizenship or legal alien status to the state agency. This act must be approved by voters on the 2012 ballot before it can become effective in 2013. 

Example: Indiana SB 465 establishes a county domestic violence fatality review team and provides migrant child care if domestic violence is found. 

Example: Michigan HB 4409 requires applicants applying for family independence program assistance who claim they are not U.S. citizens to have their immigration status verified using the federal SAVE program.

 

VOTING (4 enacted)

Four states enacted in four laws: Alabama, California, Kansas, and Utah 

These bills address voter registration, including verification of citizenship. 

Example : Kansas HB 2067 requires proof of U.S. citizenship to vote. 

Example : Utah SB165 identifies acceptable forms of voter identification including a driver's license, ID card, U.S. passport, birth certificate, Social Security card, naturalization documents or financial statements.
 

RESOLUTIONS (109 adopted)

Twenty-five states adopted 109 resolutions and memorials: Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Idaho, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont and Washington.  

Most celebrate America's ethnic heritage and other programs or individuals that serve refugees or immigrants. Six urge the administration or Congress to act on an immigration matter. 

Example: North Dakota HCR 3045 directs Legislative Management to study the feasibility and desirability of requiring private or public employers or both to use the federal E-Verify program for new hires. 

Example: California AJR 17 urges Congress and the president to increase funding for law enforcement and crime prevention programs (including the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program) and to pay the full costs of incarcerating undocumented criminals. 

Example: Vermont HJR 14 urges Congress and the U.S. Departments of Labor and of Homeland Security to authorize H-2A visas for seasonal, 12-month agricultural workers. 

Powered By StateNet 

 

 

Prepared by:

Brooke Meyer, Fall Fellow; Joy Segreto, Summer Fellow; April Carter, Spring Fellow; and
Ann Morse, Program Director, Immigrant Policy Project, NCSL
www.ncsl.org/programs/immig 

Reviewers:

Sheri Steisel, Federal Affairs Counsel, NCSL
Molly Ramsdell, Director, Washington Office, NCSL
Neal Osten, Director, Washington Office, NCSL 

This report was made possible (in part) by a grant from the Four Freedoms Fund. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of NCSL.

 

 

 

Share this: 
NCSL Summit Resources
We are the nation's most respected bipartisan organization providing states support, ideas, connections and a strong voice on Capitol Hill.

NCSL Member Toolbox

Denver

7700 East First Place
Denver, CO 80230
Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800

Washington

444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515
Washington, D.C. 20001
Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069

Copyright 2014 by National Conference of State Legislatures