Back 

Pooling Public Employee Health Care- Health Cost C

Pooling Public Employee Health Care

Updated November 2012

Cost Containment header

The following NCSL Issue brief has been distributed to state legislators and legislative staff across the country.

Pooling Public Employee Health Care #10-  PDF File
Colorado Supplement: Pooling Public Employee Health Benefit ProgramsPDF File

To read portable document format (.pdf) files, use  Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Cost Containment Strategy and Logic

Pooled public employee health benefit programs refer to efforts to merge or combine state employee health insurance with that of other public agencies and programs.  About half the states have opened participation in their state employee health benefit plans to other public-sector employers, such as school districts or cities and counties. Two states have piloted programs to allow private sector employers to join their state employee pools.
Some public purchasers regularly try to lower overall administrative costs and negotiate lower prices from providers and insurers using their large numbers of enrollees as a bargaining tool. Health costs are controlled by using size, volume purchases and professional expertise to:
  • Minimize and combine administrative and marketing costs;
  • Facilitate negotiations with health insurers for more favorable premium rates and broader benefit packages; and
  • Relieve individual employers of the burden of choosing plans and negotiating coverage and payment details.
In addition to cost containment and simplification, multi-agency purchasing arrangements also can give employees more choices of health benefit plans. This option often is not available if each smaller agency were to obtain coverage independently.  Small public employer groups often benefit the most from purchasing pools and alliances. As Figure 1 illustrates, the larger the employer group, the lower the percentage of the health premium devoted to administrative costs versus medical care payments.

Summary of Health Cost Containment and Efficiency Strategies - Brief #10- Pooling Public Employee Health Care

State/Private Sector Examples  Strategy Description Target of Cost Containment Evidence of Effect on Costs
California, West Virginia Programs that pool or combine health insurance purchasers across or beyond traditional jurisdictions or associations, including public employee health coverage pools and private sector health purchasing alliances. High administrative costs as a proportion of small and mid-sized employer premiums.
Limited ability of small and mid-sized groups to negotiate lower health care prices or premiums or benefit .
Evidence indicates arrangements may benefit small groups that join large state pools but have not slowed overall insurance premium increases.
 

About this NCSL project

NCSL’s Health Cost Containment and Efficiency Series will describe two dozen alternative policy approaches, with an emphasis on documented and fiscally calculated results. The project is housed at the NCSL Health Program in Denver, Colorado. It is led by Richard Cauchi (Program Director) and Martha King (Group Director) with Barbara Yondorf as lead researcher. 
NCSL gratefully acknowledges the financial support for this publication series from The Colorado Health Foundation and Rose Community Foundation of Denver, Colorado
Share this: 
New Members Welcome
We are the nation's most respected bipartisan organization providing states support, ideas, connections and a strong voice on Capitol Hill.

NCSL Member Toolbox

Denver

7700 East First Place
Denver, CO 80230
Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800

Washington

444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515
Washington, D.C. 20001
Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069

Copyright 2014 by National Conference of State Legislatures