Skip to Page Content
Home  |  Contact Us  |  Press Room  |  Site Overview  |  Help  |  Login  |  Register
Add to MyNCSL

Intelligent Transportation Systems

ITS National Associations Working Group
Meeting Summary


Thursday, January 30, 2003
International City/County Management Association
777 North Capitol Street, Conference Room 4 and 5
Washington, D.C. 20002

Agenda
List of Attendees

James Davenport, National Association of Counties (NACo)
Mr. Davenport welcomed the National Association Working Group for ITS members to the meeting, and thanked the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) for hosting the meeting in its facility.

The National Association of Counties (NACo) represents counties, providing legislative, research, technical, and public affairs assistance and services. NACo deals directly with issues that relate to all modes of transport including highway, rail, waterborne, and air. NACo encourages the use of ITS to make travel more efficient and safe. NACo recently signed an agreement with the Federal Highway Administration to provide articles on ITS to their members. Articles currently being developed focus on traffic incident management and how to apply ITS to rural areas.

Discussion:
ITS sheets or fact sheets produced by the Working Group focus on incident management and ITS in rural areas that may be helpful in producing the white papers. Members may wish to consider including these fact sheets in their association newsletters.

The Working Group members were encouraged to consider exchanging newsletters to keep up to date on each other's activities. Laurie Radow will assist in facilitating exchange.

Theresa Smith, Federal Highway Administration
Value Pricing - Presentation

Ms. Smith began her presentation by stating that the FHWA is pleased to speak with the Working Group members as the Value Pricing program is constantly looking for outreach opportunities. Road pricing serves as an effective tool to reduce congestion without adding expensive capacity. The FHWA Value Pricing Pilot Program has been in existence for 10 years, initially funded through ISTEA in 1991. To date the program has distributed $30 million; $26 million since the enactment of TEA-21 in 1999. The objective of value pricing is to manage demand by creating shifts in route choice, mode choice, and travel times. The goals of the FHWA program are to reduce overall congestion, reduce emissions and fuel consumption, and provide revenues to improve services and commuter choices. Currently the FHWA has active value pricing agreements with 15 states.

Value Pricing Strategies

Variable tolls - Used to delay the need for capacity expansions through distribution of traffic flow. Revenues generated allow for improvement of services and infrastructure. The first example of variable tolls is currently in use in Lee County Florida. Tolls are reduced during non-peak hours to encourage shifts in travel times. Citizens with electronic transponders are eligible to participate in the program. To date the program is considered successful.

Dynamic Pricing - On the I-15 in San Diego a dynamic pricing system called FasTrak is being used. The FasTrak system consists of two 8-mile reversible lanes located in the median. The system started with low technology monthly passes. In December of 1998 the system became dynamic with prices potentially changing every 6 minutes. Prices range from $.50 to $4. A level of service C must be maintained on the facility, with measurements based either on traffic speed or level of traffic. Typically 75% of the traffic in the FasTrak lane is high occupancy vehicle (HOV). The system generates around $2 million annually, serving approximately 4,000 vehicles per day. Revenue generated improves transit, customer service, maintenance and equipment, and enforcement.

HOV to HOT - The HOV lanes on the I-10 in Houston Texas have a dual occupancy requirement. HOV3 is required during peak congestion periods, and as a priced HOV during off peak times. The project is a joint effort between Houston Metro Transit and Texas DOT. Using the priced HOV lanes travelers are able to save 10-20 minutes. The project uses the road capacity to the fullest, while requiring limited investment.

New Lane Pricing - State Route 91 in Orange County, California introduced tolls on newly added lanes. Tolls on SR 91 range from $.50 to $4.75. Ownership of the lanes is currently being transferred to public control; initially California was unable to finance the added lanes. SR 91 uses prepaid accounts with overhead antennas reading vehicle transponders and deducting tolls form each account. Vehicles with greater than two people pay 50% of tolls; photo enforcement is used to catch vehicles not complying with HOV rules. The system generates about $23.9 million annually, with $10.2 being used for operating expenses.

Q-Jumps - In Lee County, Florida "Queue Jumps" are available at congestion points for motorists to by-pass slow traffic. The Q-Jumps are elevated roads, ramps, or at grade lanes that give motorists the option of paying a small amount to bypass a congested segment of the road.

FAIR Lanes - Provides a less congested alternative to motorists in California. The FAIR lane is separated by plastic pylons and striping. The dynamic prices for the FAIR lane changes based on the level of traffic using the lanes; as lane capacity is approached the price rises to deter new traffic. Drivers can earn credits towards the FAIR lanes during congested travel in the regular lanes.

Fuel tax replacement study will look at the feasibility of charging fuel tax to motorists based on a per mile basis. GPS technology will allow for measuring of distance traveled per vehicle.

Congestion Charge - A new system has recently been activated in London that will charge vehicles that operate in a busy section of Central London. The cost to drive within the congestion charge ring is $8, and is enforced by license plate photography technology.

Equity

Opponents of value pricing have expressed concern about (social) equity, perceiving that lower income groups will be adversely affected. However, in a survey of motorists that use the I-15 in San Diego, 91% of those surveyed think the timesaving option is a good idea; the lowest income motorists surveyed support the system more than the highest income motorists; 89% of all motorists would support extension of HOT lanes.

In the Future

In order to increase the use of value pricing, changes in state legislation may be necessary, increased private sector involvement must be achieved, changes need to be made in FTA funding restrictions, and outreach workshops are needed that relate the benefits and successes.

FHWA Role

The FHWA has developed workshops, outreach material, a video, and research publications related to value pricing. Representatives from the value-pricing program welcome the opportunity to speak on the issue to the Working Group associations and their members. For more information see the website on value pricing at www.valuepricing.org. Contact Theresa Smith at Theresa.smith@fhwa.dot.gov, or get in touch with a member of the value pricing team at 202-366-4076.

Discussion:

  • Funding is available through cooperative agreements, and legislatively could be made with individual counties; however, typically funding goes through state departments of transportation and is funneled down to individual counties. Tri-party agreements have been made in the past, such as between the FHWA, State DOTs, and transit agencies.
  • It is important to increase awareness of this program at the local level. This might be better facilitated through the Working Group members outreach mechanisms such as newsletters, and websites. There is a media kit available on the FHWA website that may be a useful starting point.
  • Information on strategies to ensure a successful program is being compiled. Basically it takes a champion to develop interest; strong public outreach; a public realization that there is a congestion problem; and agreement from environmental and transit groups.
  • There is a program in Virginia that allows low emission SOVs to use HOV lanes.
  • In some cases ITS data is being used to support the case for value pricing. A program was in place on SR 91 to collect data, with reports mandated on a ten-year basis. Data collection is not wide spread due to funding constraints. Improved methodology that can better account for mode shifts is needed.
  • There are restrictions on how revenues can be spent, the FHWA encourages funding be used to maintain and improve the facilities.

 

Wayne Berman, Federal Highway Administration
Regional Transportation Operations Collaboration and Coordination - Presentation

Mr. Berman announced that a new FHWA Office of Operations initiative will enhance regional operations collaboration and coordination. The initiative will help achieve the Congestion Vital Few Goals, as set by the FHWA. The goal of regional operations coordination is to have elements of the surface transportation system work better by working together; and to improve collaboration and coordination on a regional level. The FHWA - FTA Linking Planning and Operations Working Group met in 2001 to discuss and develop formal collaboration for operations needs in order for metro areas to better share information and address transportation issues on a regional level.

Regional Operations Collaboration and Coordination is a set of collectively defined expectations, not just issues, for regional transportation systems with the time horizon being 3-5 years. Critical to the success of the program is the establishment of federal laws to link collaboration with the transportation planning process. Operations managers should collaborate regionally to shape collectively regional policies, programs, procedures, protocols, and projects. Many agreements are needed to institute a regional operations concept. It is critical to create a vision for success and pursue that vision. Personnel involved in operations will need to shift activities from reactive to proactive. Regional collaboration will require a variety of stakeholders, including public safety, operations managers, freight agencies, tourism agencies, and transportation personnel.

Regional collaboration often takes place during special events, but typically only for the duration of the event. Special events afford a great opportunity for regional collaboration to get started and optimally to maintain momentum after the event. Major reconstruction projects can also serve as a starting point to create interest in regional operations coordination.

Articles and reports are available for the Working Group members to use in their newsletters and websites. Mr. Berman is willing to schedule special sessions to discuss regional collaboration in more detail with the Working Group member contingencies. Electronic copies of the report developed from the working group meeting, Regional Transportation Operations Collaboration and Coordination - A Primer for Working Together to Improve Transportation Safety, Reliability, and Security, are available at http://www.ops.dot.gov/travel. For further information or hard copy of the report contact Wayne Berman at wayne.berman@fhwa.dot.gov

Future Activities

A six-hour course is being developed through the NHI based on the Primer for Working Together to Improve Collaboration and Coordination.

A Regional Concept of Operations Policy workshop is in development by a steering committee, to advise FHWA. The workshop is by invitation only, but there is potential for future workshops to address a broader audience.

Discussion:

  • The proposal of a Working Group session focused on regional collaboration was a good idea and should be scheduled was met with general agreement. Laurie Radow will coordinate.
  • ICMA has a project with the ITS Public Safety program at DOT to explore challenges and opportunities to improve incident management among public safety and transportation officials.

 

Mike Onder, Federal Highway Administration
Intermodal Freight Security - Presentation  There are many organizations involved with intermodal freight security, slide two of Mr. Onder's handout shows organizations and related efficiency efforts. The two agencies that are most heavily involved are U.S. Customs and the US DOT.

Mike Onder conveyed the DOT ITS Intermodal Freight Program for FY 02-03 including several research and operational tests activities. He highlighted the Intermodal Freight Technology Working Group. The public/private cooperative forum is focused on freight efficiency and security. New action items identified from the Long Beach Freight Security Workshops are intermodal end-to-end security vulnerability analysis, and developing smart containers of the future.

During the intermodal process information flows are often not consolidated between agencies, resulting in redundant data collection and processing efforts. It is critical that "business to business" relationships be developed, between agencies, with the federal government getting the data off the top. The International Freight Technology Working Group (IFTWG) is exploring the development of an information system, which can track truck chassis, determine if a container is on board, and identify location. The electronic truck could provide real-time information tracking and information for the intermodal freight data exchange.

A joint project between the FHWA and the FAA will explore a more efficient movement of air cargo, reduced potential for air cargo tampering, and enhanced air cargo security measures. The project utilizes cargo being trucked from private companies to Chicago O'Hare Airport. A smart card with biometric technology is used; data from the smart card is transferred using electronic supply chain data. The FHWA Intermodal Freight Program has recommended a larger sample size for more accurate results.

Electronic container seals are part of an emerging layered approach to security. Tests are being performed on containers being shipped between Washington and Canada. A signal is sent to notify agency security if a container is tampered with. The signal notes the location of the container, based on read points. Critical to the program is standardizing data sets.

Ongoing ITS Freight Security Activities

  • The Cargo Handling Cooperative Program - MARAD is leading a public/private effort to develop the Cargo Handling Cooperative Program.
  • International/Intermodal Freight Data Exchange - Goal to get electronic manifests accepted for world use.
  • International Standards Need - To eliminate the need for manual re-entry or extensive conversion of data as freight moves through the supply chain. The goal is to have standards in place by mid-year 2004.

MUTCD Peer-to-Peer Program

Debra (Dee) Chappell, Federal Highway Administration

The Peer-to-Peer program on Traffic Control Devices (P2P TCD) is a no cost assistance program to deal with questions on the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and traffic control devices/issues. The program benefits from the experience of agencies around the country.

How does the program work?

  1. An agency in need requests assistance by email (P2P@fhwa.dot.gov) or toll-free telephone (888-700-PEER) describing its needs to the P2P coordinator.
  2. The P2P coordinator matches the needs of the agency with transportation professional that has relevant experience/expertise.
  3. The peer contacts the agency to work out the details of the assistance within the program framework; there is potential for site visits depending on agency needs.
  4. Both the peer and agency are evaluated for program improvements.

How does one join?

To participate in the P2P program one must submit a one-page document highlighting his/her background and experience. A self-assessment must also be included. Please contact a P2P coordinator for more details on this process.

Virtual P2P TCD

Through the MUTCD website, an online threaded discussion is available for peers to discuss issues/questions relevant to the MUTCD and traffic control devices. The discussion area allows for an informal interaction that today's busy transportation professionals can utilize to connect and network with peers. Join or simply browse the discussion through the Peer 2 Peer website at http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov.

News articles and flyers are available describing the Peer-to-Peer program both in print and electronically. The Working Group members should consider using these resources for member newsletters. Contact a program coordinator for more information on available resources.

ICDN - Update

Jerry Werner, ITS Cooperative Deployment Network (ICDN)

  • 27,200 page views during January
  • 8,534 subscribers to the ICDN Newsletter
  • Recent ICDN Newsletter content of note
    • Advocating Operations Investments to Decision-Makers
    • Rural ITS Activities Update
    • Workshop - Moving Toward an Integrated Network of Transportation Information (INTI).
    • Regional Transportation Operations Collaboration and Coordination
  • Visit the website at http://www.nawgits.com/icdntour.html

E-Dialogue - Update
Laurie Radow, Federal Highway Administration

To expand its base, we are looking at different types of questions. One such way would be to have Working Group members to serve as discussion leaders on the ICDN electronic discussion website. The hope is to move away from technical discussions into policy-based issues. Please contact Laurie Radow for more information on the online discussion. To participate in the online forum see the website at http://www.nawgits.com/itsforum/nawg/index.cgi?index

Business Meeting
Laurie Radow, Federal Highway Administration

Ms. Radow thanked James Davenport (NACo) for chairing the meeting, and the ICMA for hosting. The next Working Group meeting will take place on March 20th. The meeting will feature Jeff Paniati, Jon Obenberger, and Ralph Gillman. Please send comments or thoughts on the meeting or any the Working Group related information to Laurie Radow at Laurel.Radow@fhwa.dot.gov

Next Meeting
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2003
Time and location: 9:45 am - noon, TRB, 500 Fifth Street, N.W.
Topic and Speakers:

Jeff Paniati, FHWA: Office of Operations
Jon Obenberger, FHWA: Special Events
Ralph Gillman, FHWA: ITS Data

 


National Associations Working Group for ITS
January 30, 2002
9:45 a.m. - noon
International City/County Management Association
777 North Capitol Street, Conference Rooms 4 and 5
Washington, DC 20002

Agenda

Opening Remarks and Introductions
James Davenport, National Association of Counties (10 minutes)

Regional Operations Coordination
Wayne Berman, Federal Highway Administration (15-minute presentation, 15 minutes discussion)
Regional Transportation Operations Collaboration and Coordination - Presentation

Intermodal Freight Security
Mike Onder, Federal Highway Administration (15 minute presentation, 10 minute discussion)
Intermodal Freight Security - Presentation

Value Pricing
Theresa Smith, Federal Highway Administration (15 minute presentation, 10 minute discussion)
Value Pricing - A Tool with Technology - Presentation

MUTCD Peer-to-Peer Program
Dee Chappell, Federal Highway Administration (10 minute presentation)

ICDN - Update
Jerry Werner, ICDN (5 minutes)

E-Dialogue -- Update
Laurie Radow, FHWA (5 minutes)

Business Meeting
Laurie Radow, FHWA (5 minutes)

 

Next Meeting
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2003
Time and location: 9:45 am - noon, TRB, 500 Fifth Street, N.W.
Topic and Speakers:

Jeff Paniati, FHWA: Office of Operations
Jon Obenberger, FHWA: Special Events
Ralph Gillman, FHWA: ITS Data

 

National Associations Working Group for ITS

January 30, 2002

Attendees

 

James Davenport, National Association of Counties
Andrew Meese, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
Zia Burleigh, International City/Council Management Association
Marcia Pincus, ITS America
Peggy Tadej, National Association of Regional Council
Brian Bruzek, Healthcare Distribution Management Association
Maria Polis, National Association of Regional Councils
Russell Houston, Transportation Research Board
Kelly Novak, National Association of Development Organizations
Shelley Row, Federal Highway Administration
Mike Onder, Federal Highway Administration
Wayne Berman, Federal Highway Administration
Theresa Smith, Federal Highway Administration
Debra Chappell, Federal Highway Administration
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, Federal Highway Administration
Laurie Radow, Federal Highway Administration
Yehuda Gross, Federal Highway Administration
John Mason, Science Applications International Corporation
Brett Graves, Science Applications International Corporation
Jerry Werner, ICDN via teleconference


Return to NAWG page

Visitor counts for this page.

Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001