|
|
Home | Contact Us | Press Room | Site Overview | Help | Login | Register |
![]() |
![]() |
| About NCSL | State & Federal Issues | Legislatures | Legislative Staff | Meetings | Bookstore | Legislators & Staff Only |
| NCSL Home > Bookstore > | Add to MyNCSL |
State Legislatures Magazine: December 2000Editor's Note: This article appeared in the December 2000 issue of NCSL's magazine, State Legislatures. To order copies or to subscribe, contact the marketing department at (303) 364-7700. A Smorgasbord of Ballot Measures Taxes A Smorgasbord of Ballot MeasuresVoters in 42 states considered a total of 204 ballot measures on Election Day. Those approved ran the gamut from tax and campaign limits to gun control and animal rights. By Jennie Drage Voters in 42 states considered a total of 204 ballot measures on Election Day 2000. About 63 percent of these passed. Of the 71 citizen-initiated measures, about 48 percent received voter approval. That's slightly higher than the historical average passage rate of about 40 percent, but lower than the 60 percent rate we saw in 1998. Here's a rundown of how some of the key issues played out across the country. TAXES Another anti-tax activist, Washington's Tim Eyman, was more successful. His Initiative 722 passed, requiring state and local governments to refund tax and fee increases that were passed in December 1999. It also limits future property tax increases. Other property tax limits had mixed results, with Alaska voters defeating one, but Arkansas voters approving another. Property tax relief for senior citizens passed in Arizona, Colorado and Georgia. Montana and South Dakota voters repealed their states' inheritance taxes. Massachusetts voters decided on three tax measures. They passed an income tax rate reduction and a deduction for charitable contributions, but defeated a tax credit for highway tolls. EDUCATION Voucher programs were soundly defeated in both California and Michigan, as was Washington's charter school measure. Arizona increased its sales tax by 0.6 percent for education. Colorado voted to require that per pupil spending increase by the rate of inflation plus one percentage point for the next 10 years. However, Colorado voters defeated a second measure dedicating excess state revenue to math and science grants for public schools. Washington and Virginia decided to dedicate the revenues from their existing state lottery to education, while South Carolina voters approved creating a new state lottery and dedicating its revenues to education. New Mexico, North Carolina and Rhode Island passed school funding bond measures. Oregon passed a measure requiring that the legislature fund public schools adequately to meet certain goals. In other education measures, Arizona followed California's 1998 move to ban bilingual education, and Oregon voted against tying teacher pay to job performance. TOBACCO SETTLEMENT REVENUES Arkansas, Montana and Oklahoma also voted to dedicate their share of tobacco settlement money to health care. Utah voters agreed to create a trust fund and let the Legislature decide how to spend it. The only state in which a tobacco measure failed was Oregon, where voters defeated not one but two competing measures on how to allocate the funds.
DRUG POLICY Measures mandating treatment instead of incarceration for drug possession and use passed in California, but failed in Massachusetts. Laws that make it more difficult for law enforcement to seize property used in a crime were passed in Oregon and Utah. ANIMAL RIGHTS
GUN CONTROL HEALTH CARE GAY RIGHTS GAMING LEGISLATURES Nebraska legislators will be limited to two consecutive terms beginning in 2008. This is the fourth time Nebraska voters have approved term limits-they were invalidated by the courts the first three times. Nebraska becomes the 19th state with term limits for legislators. REDISTRICTING CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM "Clean elections" public financing failed in Missouri, but passed in Oregon. Clean elections laws have been passed in the last four years in Maine, Vermont, Arizona and Massachusetts. Candidates who opt into the system receive grants from the state to fund their elections. In return, they must agree to abide by spending limits and not to accept any private contributions. Like California, Oregon had no limits on contributions to candidates before this measure passed. Jennifer Drage covers campaign finance, initiative and referendum, and term limits for NCSL. ©2000, National Conference of State Legislatures. All rights reserved. |
© 2008 National Conference of State Legislatures, All Rights Reserved
Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001