Eco-terrorism-A New Kind of Sabotage
By L. Cheryl Runyon
Eco-terrorism or eco-sabotage is any crime committed in the name of
saving nature. Eco-terrorists commit arson and burglary, trespass, issue
death threats, and engage in malicious destruction of property and vandalism-usually
against farmers, ranchers, miners, loggers, researchers, manufacturers
or home builders. Targets include animal research labs, logging camps,
mills, power generation and distribution facilities, and forestry buildings.
The criminal acts are intended to change the behavior of individuals and
institutions or to alter public policies.
Environmentalists have protested by acts of civil disobedience, sit-ins
and chaining themselves to trees; others have upped the ante by using violence
and massive destruction to convey their messages and beliefs. Eco-sabotage
crimes began nearly 20 years ago following the publication of The Monkey
Wrench Gang by Edward Abbey. This book of fiction follows four eco-saboteurs
angered by development in the West as they burn billboards, disable road
graders and blow up a railroad bridge. Until recently, sabotage in the
name of environmental protection had limited local impact and drew little
public attention. Targets have grown larger, however, and crimes have escalated
with the use of bombs and arson.
Eco-terrorism on the Increase. The Oregonian newspaper, in September
1999, documented 100 major incidents of arson, bombings and other acts
of sabotage committed in 11 western states since 1980; environmental terrorists
claimed credit for two-thirds of these crimes. Damages totaled $42.8 million.
One-third occurred in the last four years, causing $28.8 million in damages.
Twenty percent of all major events occurred in Oregon, at a cost of $13
million. The Vail, Colo., ski resort arson in 1998 caused $12 million in
losses. California was third on the financial list with $8.5 million in
damages from 30 incidents.
Recent developments include protesting urban sprawl by setting fire
to luxury homes in Long Island, N.Y.; Niwot, Colo., and Phoenix, Ariz.
Acts of sabotage against genetic research also are on the increase. A fire
was set at a Michigan State University building because the school had
a grant to study gene-altered food. Other acts of vandalism include "crop-busting"-demonstrators
yank crops from university test plots, trample experimental grass fields,
prune grapevines and uproot strawberry fields.
Eco-terrorists adhere to the "leaderless resistance" principle. The
police believe the perpetrators typically are ad hoc bands of two to six
people who focus on specific targets. Animal rights activists have joined
with radical environmentalists in a shared fight to save not just the wilderness,
but all animals-wild and domestic.
State Action
Oregon legislators have introduced a bill that would make repeat acts of
eco-terrorism punishable under the state's racketeering law. The bill adds
crimes against agricultural enterprises, research laboratories and livestock
operations to the state law originally designed to fight criminal organizations.
Under the bill, a person who vandalizes or steals from a research facility,
logging operation or livestock business twice or more in a five-year period
would face a Class A felony charge (20 years in prison and a $300,000 fine).
The bill has no effect on legal protests or demonstrations on behalf of
animal rights or environmental causes.
A 2000 California law mandates more severe punishment for people who
willfully destroy agricultural research crops. The law makes a person who
intentionally destroys research crops liable for twice the value of the
damaged crop. The courts will determine the value of damaged crops on an
individual basis; reimbursement will include research and development costs.
Costs that could be recovered include tuition or lost wages for graduate
students' damaged projects.
Nebraska is considering a bill that would provide double damages for
sabotage of agricultural research. Utah enacted HB 322 during the 2001
session to increase the penalties for crimes committed against animal enterprises
(livestock, rodeos or fairs). Pennsylvania considered a bill during its
2000 session to define the offense of environmental terrorism and to require
restitution to the affected person or business.
Federal Action
Congress passed the Animal Enterprise Protection Act in 1992. It is an
offense, punishable by up to a year in prison, to physically disrupt an
animal enterprise and cause the owners to lose $10,000 or more. The act
provides a life imprisonment penalty for killing someone during the commission
of the crime.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation pursues eco-terrorism under federal
domestic terrorism statutes and has established task forces to investigate
cases. Unfortunately, few suspects are apprehended; investigations have
led to fewer than 20 major cases being solved. Although no one has been
killed, there have been close calls.
Examples of Eco-terrorism
-
Vandalizing an animal experimentation lab in Orange, Calif.
-
Burning a meat processor plant in Eugene, Ore.
-
Setting fire to a log loader at a wood chip mill in Washington.
-
"Liberating" 5,000 mink at a fur farm in Michigan; about 4,500 animals
were recovered but others were run over by cars or killed by dogs.
-
Raiding a Wisconsin vaccine research facility and releasing 150 minks and
ferrets.
-
Setting fire to a U.S. Bureau of Land Management center in Burns, Ore.
-
Burning a government truck and spray painting U.S. Forest Service buildings
and vehicles with anti-logging messages.
Selected References
Denson, Bryan. "Lawmakers target eco-terrorism." The Oregonian, Feb. 16,
2000, www.oregonlive.com/news/00/02/st021603.html.
Denson, Bryan and James Long. "Eco-terrorism sweeps the American West."
The Oregonian, Sept. 26, 1999, www.oregonlive.com/special/series/ecocrime.ssf?/special/series/ecocrime_story1.
Kane, Karli. "Bill Seeks to Fight Eco-Terrorism on UC-Davis Crops."
The California Aggie, Sept. 1, 2000, www.studentadvantage.com/article/0,1075,c8-i79-t0-a106136,00.html.
Contacts for More Information
Cheryl Runyon
NCSL-Denver
(303) 364-7700, ext. 252
cheryl.runyon@ncsl.org
Molly Stauffer
NCSL-Washington, D.C.
(202) 624-3584
molly.stauffer@ncsl.org |