Skip to Page Content
Home  |  Contact Us  |  Press Room  |  Site Overview  |  Help  |  Login  |  Register
Add to MyNCSL

2002 NLPES Fall Conference Notes
Roundtable on the State and Federal Budget Crisis

Facilitator: Martha Carter, Program Evaluation Analyst, Nebraska Legislative Program Evaluation Unit.

This roundtable discussion centered on how, and to what extent, evaluation and audit offices are affected by current budget predicaments and restraints.

Ms. Carter began the discussion by stating that about half of the individuals responding to a question posted on the NLPES website regarding how offices were affected by their state's current budget, stated that their office was not significantly affected.

Texas has not yet seen significant effects, but expects to soon. The governor has solicited ideas for cutting the budget, as a $5-12 billion shortfall is estimated. The focus of the response to the shortfall is on how to work more effectively and efficiently.

Florida has experienced a significant impact from budget issues. A special legislative session authorized some reductions in state agency budgets. Evaluators find it challenging to make recommendations in their reports because of the recent reductions.

Roundtable participants were asked how their offices are coping with the challenge of writing recommendations within moderate to severe budget constraints. The following coping strategies were offered: agencies are asked to prioritize their objectives and to work within existing budgets. Agencies are also asked to examine specific possible tactics, such as re-working vacant positions.

South Carolina has cut back on office space, and hasn't filled vacant positions. The focus is on cost-savings in many audit reports being issued.

Arizona has reduced the size of its performance audit division. The budget situation in Arizona is affected by several factors. Ballot initiatives and lawsuits protect some state revenue. There is no state property tax, and the sales tax, as a primary source of revenue, is declining with the recent economic downturn. Arizona does not have a broad base of revenue sources. Legislation will probably have to address some type of tax reform; however, tax reform is complicated by the fact that a constitutional amendment requires a super-majority legislative vote of 75% for a tax increase. The Auditor General's Office has decreased personnel from 225 to 190, and is looking at decreasing their workload.

Other participants from Arizona reported that they are careful in making recommendations to state agencies that may impact budgets, such as hiring more staff; however there remains a tension between audit findings and auditors' ability to make appropriate recommendations.

As mentioned earlier, Texas is facing a budget shortfall and the State Auditor's Office budget is restricted. The workforce has not been cut; however there are no pay raises forthcoming. There is a lot of turnover in the office. Their work is currently focused on assisting with the appropriations process. For example they are looking at earmarked funds to determine if any can be freed up. They are also looking at agency estimates. For example, are state agencies properly estimating caseloads? Texas' budget problems are similar to Arizona in regard to a small tax base. In addition, Texas does not have a state property tax or income tax.

Colorado has similar budget problems in that the legislature cannot raise taxes without voter approval. In addition, some revenue is dedicated to education costs. There have been some budget cuts in the Office of the State Auditor.

An administrator from an Arizona state agency noted that there have been cuts made to the agency's travel and technology budgets. The agency has submitted a supplemental budget request; however they are looking at ways to cut 10% of their budget through scaling back on some tasks.

Arizona is also challenged in designing evaluative studies to assess effectiveness of state programs within the context of budget constraints.

Louisiana is in a "budget standstill." The Legislative Auditor's Office has had to cut resources in the planning and reporting phases of the audit process.

A participant from Arizona stated that the Auditor General's Office will be smaller because of budget constraints, but that there are opportunities in the current budget crisis. For example, the audit managers have been given the opportunity to work closely with the appropriations committee.

There was some discussion on whether or not states should be trying to cut a little from all departments, or whether it would make more sense to eliminate entire agencies or programs. Some of the discussion centered on the political ramifications of trying to eliminate agencies, and the fact that the programs likely to be eliminated would also be likely to have insignificant fiscal impact. There were also questions raised about the future costs of this strategy. For example, would cutting youth diversion programs only lead to higher future costs in adult corrections?
 

Tennessee has concentrated on doing core functions more efficiently, and has found that doing away with non-essentials has not impacted performance. Taxes have been raised. In addition, the question was raised of whether or not performance-based budgeting allows for legislative committees to effectively cut budgets.

Florida's experience with performance-based budgeting indicates that many agencies do not take this type of budgeting to heart, and that a better method is to offer performance based fiscal incentives.

Louisiana has seen some impact from performance-based budgeting, but the programs that are eliminated due to this type of budgeting are obvious choices. Therefore performance-based budgeting probably won't be extremely helpful in times of budget crises. In Louisiana measures for reporting have been developed for performance-based budgeting; however most legislators still budget according to line items. There is some question of whether or not performance-based budgeting helps legislators.

In the Virginia Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, there has been a 10% cut in staff, and the workload will probably be reduced. In addition, Virginia's new governor will probably make some high profile budget cuts.

Idaho's short term budget is reasonable if revenue forecasts are correct. Some programs are being affected by budget issues and the Governor has created a taskforce to look at possible budget cuts.

Louisiana may shift some of the revenue burden from sales tax to income tax.

Utah has cut the state budget by 4% this year. Analysts expect the budget to be flat, and suspect that the cost of benefits for state employees will rise. However, the participant from Utah also sees opportunities in the current budget predicament. For example, auditors have the opportunity to help state agencies identify inefficiencies.

Florida experienced across the board cuts of 5% last year and 6% this year. The participant from Florida stated that the office has not cut any positions, but that they have a greater workload. There was some discussion of the possibilities that exist to address the growing budget crisis, including tax increases and broadening the existing tax base. The participant from Florida noted that there are opportunities for evaluators and auditors in the current fiscal atmosphere. These include working more closely with fiscal committees and tracking the fiscal impact of recommendations.

Back2002 Fall Training Conference Notes

Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001