|
|
Home | Contact Us | Press Room | Site Overview | Help | Login | Register |
![]() |
![]() |
| About NCSL | State & Federal Issues | Legislatures | Legislative Staff | Meetings | Bookstore | Legislators & Staff Only |
| NCSL Home > State & Federal Issues: Issue Areas > Telecommunications & Information Technology > | Add to MyNCSL |
News From the StatesThis online newsletter is a product of NCSL's Communications and Information Policy Committee.Summer 2001 CONTENTSCommunications and Information Policy Committee Meeting, August 11-15, 2001
Communications and Information Policy Committee Meeting, August 11-15, 2001The next meeting of the Communications and Information Policy Committee will be during the NCSL Annual Meeting in San Antonio, Texas, August 11-15, 2001. The Committee agenda includes programs on e-communications, biometrics, and telemedicine. In addition, during the week the Committee will co-sponsor a variety of concurrent sessions on information technology and telecommunications issues including privacy of public records, rural telecommunications, digital government, and more. See the at-a-glance agenda of all the information policy and telecommunications sessions for San Antonio. Information on NCSL's Annual Meeting is available on the web site at http://www.ncsl.org/am01/. If you have questions about the Committee agenda, call or e-mail NCSL staff, Jo Anne Bourquard, (303) 364-7700, extension 151, jo.anne.bourquard@ncsl.org.
State Supreme Court Upholds Washington Anti-Spam LawA June decision by the Washington Supreme Court upholding the state's anti-spam law will allow prosecution of spammers who send deceptive or misleading e-mails to Washington residents. The decision involved a case against an Oregon man who sent millions of unsolicited e-mail messages to Internet users to promote the sale of his online booklet called "How to Profit from the Internet." The Washington State Attorney General's office filed suit, claiming the e-mail violated state law, which prohibits sending such messages that use false or misleading subject lines. A King County Superior Court had previously dismissed the case on grounds that the state law violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution by placing an undue burden on interstate commerce. However, the state Supreme Court reversed the decision, concluding that the "...Act's local benefits outweigh any conceivable burdens the act places on those sending commercial e-mail messages." Challenges to the Washington law are likely to continue in federal court. And while the case does not set precedent in other jurisdictions, at least 18 other states have anti-spam laws, and most have a provision similar to Washington's ban on false and misleading subject lines.- Submitted by Pam Greenberg Internet GamblingNevada, in the 2001 regular session, passed Assembly Bill No. 466, which legalizes Internet gambling. The state Gaming Control Board and the state Gaming Commission will draft and adopt rules governing online gambling before the legislation becomes effective. The bill provides that hotel/casinos must apply for a license to operate interactive gaming. Even though Internet gambling is currently illegal under federal law, Nevada legislators stated that the bill was passed out of a concern that Internet gambling might become legal while the legislature is out of session, as they only meet every two years.New Jersey has taken the opposite stance of Nevada by allowing a lawsuit to proceed against a foreign corporation for accepting bets from New Jersey gamblers. While New Jersey does not have any statutes banning Internet gambling, Attorney General John Farmer has filed suit against three foreign Internet gambling sites. Finding the owners of these corporations, however, may prove to be difficult, as the real names of the owners are often not listed in the corporate charters in order to avoid prosecution. Farmer, however, has stated that if the corporate officials do not respond to the summons, New Jersey would seek a default judgment against the corporations. As a backdrop to the activities of Nevada and New Jersey, Congress passed the Federal Wire and Wager Act in 2000. The Federal Wire and Wager Act, sponsored by Senator Jon Kyle (R.-A.Z.), prohibits placing wagers on any sporting event or contest using wired communications such as the telephone or Internet. The Wire and Wager Act was passed in an attempt to assist states in enforcing their gambling laws and also in recognition of the need for independent federal action to combat interstate gambling operations. - Submitted by Michael Barry The New Global Telecommunications Industry & Consumers
- Submitted by Bob Boerner Permanent Injunction Issued Against Michigan Online Child Protection Act
- Submitted by Pam Greenberg Operation Cure.AllIn June, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed complaints against six companies for making false claims about health products sold over the Internet. The companies promised to cure AIDS, cancer and aging with natural remedies and electric devices, like St. John's Wort, colloidal silver, and shark cartilage. The companies were charged with manufacturing false and unsubstantiated health and safety claims for a variety of products advertised over the web. Five companies agreed to settle the charges while a formal complaint in federal district court was lodged against the sixth.The FTC proposed settlements requiring companies to cease making false claims about their products; some firms will be required to offer refunds to customers, while one will pay $150,000 in fines. The actions are part of a coordinated effort with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Health Canada and state attorneys general. Launched in 1999 and known as "Operation Cure.All", it is a continuing crackdown on the sale of unproven health products over the Internet. - Submitted by Janna Goodwin Courts Reject DNA Database ChallengesAll states have passed laws to require DNA collection from certain sex offenders. In most states, other serious offenders also are required to provide samples. Last year alone, at least nine states added crimes for which offenders are required to submit genetic samples. Courts have paved the way for expanded offender sampling, with constitutional challenges under the Fourth Amendment, Eighth Amendment and the Ex Post Facto Clause, largely without success.The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Usually, for a search and seizure to be considered reasonable, the police must obtain a search warrant, having shown probable cause. Regarding DNA samples from convicted offenders, courts have held that such a warrant is not required because the statute applies uniformly to all specified offenders. And, with fingerprints, courts have determined that government's interest in accurate prosecution of crimes and in solving future crimes outweighs a convicted offender's right of privacy. Offenders have challenged DNA databases under the "cruel and unusual punishment" provisions of the Eighth Amendment. Courts have replied that where the DNA sample is taken by a trained technician who complies with medically acceptable procedures, nonconsensual drawing of the DNA sample does not violate the Eighth Amendment. And, since the DNA sample is taken for a legitimate interest in constructing the DNA database, and not for intentionally harming inmates, the Eighth Amendment prohibition is not triggered. The final major argument leveled against DNA databases is the Ex Post Facto Clause prohibiting states from passing a law that changes the punishment for a crime or criminalizes behavior for an act that was not criminal or punishable at the time it was committed. Courts have denied this challenge, as well, responding that DNA databases do not retroactively disadvantage offenders. Rulings have asserted that because DNA databases serve law enforcement, not penal purposes, they do not impose a greater punishment. The June issue of State Legislatures magazine features the article, "Proof Positive: DNA Testing of Criminals," The program "DNA: Power to Convict, Exonerate" will be held on Tuesday, August 14th during NCSL's Annual Meeting in San Antonio, Texas. - Submitted by Heather Morton Closing in on CyberstalkersLaw enforcement agencies estimate that electronic communications are a factor in 20 percent to 40 percent of all stalking cases. At least 36 states now have laws that explicitly include electronic forms of communication within stalking or harassment laws, and an Illinois bill, if signed by the governor, will add a cyberstalking offense to the state's law, which currently addresses only harassing communications. State laws that do not include specific references to electronic communication may still apply to those who threaten or harass others online, but specific language can make the laws easier to enforce. A 1999 U.S. Department of Justice report, Cyberstalking: A New Challenge for Law Enforcement and Industry, provides additional information about the nature and extent of cyberstalking, efforts to address the problem, the adequacy of current state and federal laws, and information on First Amendment and other legal considerations.- Submitted by Pam Greenberg Digital Driver's LicensesWashington is digitizing driver's licenses in an effort to thwart fraud and identity theft. On a card that resembles a credit card, a driver's information is stored on a bar code on the back and front, and is theoretically difficult to counterfeit. The cards will be processed at only one facility to further protect drivers' information and are to be issued by August.Washington joins other regions utilizing technology for their departments of motor vehicles. New York's Internet site allows drivers to look up and renew personal license plates and registration in addition to tracking orders. In California, drivers can make appointments, renew vehicle registration and register to vote on its website. And in Virginia, motorists can take advantage of a myriad of services, including changing addresses, ordering plates, reporting theft, and purchasing an ID. - Submitted by Janna Goodwin
Michigan and Rhode Island are joining the ranks of states with electronic
government portals. Michigan's portal, www.Michigan.gov,
organizes all state services and information by theme rather than state
agency, so that customers no longer need to know what agency provides a
specific service. The primary themes are Education and Career Development;
Family, Health and Safety; Travel and Recreation; Business Services; Michigan
Government; and Licensing, Certification and Permits. There are currently
70 online services available. In addition, the portal contains three new
online services that include a financial aid site with comprehensive information
regarding college education, a business look-up function, and a pre-screening
program to help health care and social service providers determine a person's
eligibility for services such as food stamps and Medicaid.
|
© 2008 National Conference of State Legislatures, All Rights Reserved
Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001