Skip to Page Content
Home  |  Contact Us  |  Press Room  |  Site Overview  |  Help  |  Login  |  Register
Add to MyNCSL


Week of
October 4, 2004
I&R News Round-Up

Updated October 7, 2004

This page contains a summary of news articles on ballot measures, along with links to the articles themselves.  It is updated several times a week.

Spending on Initiative Campaigns-California, Colorado

According to the Los Angeles Times, spending on California’s 2004 ballot measures had already passed the $125 mark by October 7.  The Times is predicting spending this year is on track to hit a record.  The previous record was set in 1998, when spending for and against ballot measures totaled around $150 million.  This year’s spending is highest on the gambling measures and the stem cell research issue.

Colorado has already set a new record in spending on ballot issue campaigns this year, according to the October 7 Rocky Mountain News.  Proponents and opponents of the four statewide measures and two metro Denver issues have raised a combined $12 million so far, topping the 2000 record of $11.8 million raised by nine issue campaigns.

Same-Sex Marriage Ban-Georgia, Louisiana, Ohio, Oklahoma

The Atlanta Journal Constitution (registration required) reported on October 6 that opponents of the proposal to ban same-sex marriage have appealed their case to the state’s Supreme Court.  The suit contends that the measure violates the state’s single-subject rule because it deals not only with marriage but also with civil unions, and that the ballot question is misleading because it only mentions marriage, not civil unions.  A lower court refused to hear the case on the grounds that the measure had not yet been passed, and the courts do not hear cases on proposed law.

The Associated Press (Times Picayune) reported October 6 that a state district court judge overthrew the state’s recently passed gay marriage ban, on the grounds that it violates the state’s single-subject requirement.  The amendment prohibited not only same-sex marriage, but also civil unions.  The judge said that constitutes two separate subjects.

According to the Akron Beacom Journal, Ohio leaders, including both U.S. senators, the attorney general, the mayor of Akron and the head of the state’s AARP chapter, oppose the proposed ban on same-sex marriage.  The Catholic Conference of Ohio has announced its support of the measure, along with the secretary of state and the state auditor.

Proponents of Question 711 in Oklahoma believe that their state’s same-sex marriage ban is significantly different from the one overturned in Louisiana this week and therefore safe from a similar fate, according to the Associated Press (News-Star).

Tort Reform/Medical Malpractice-Oregon

The current and former governors of Oregon are sparring over Measure 35, which would cap noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases at $500,000.  According to the Statesman Journal, former governor John Kitzhaber, formerly a physician, supports the measure, while current governor Ted Kulongoski, a trial lawyer, opposes it.

Gambling-California

Backers of California’s Proposition 68 are dropping their campaign in support of the measure, according to the Sacramento Bee.  Prop. 68 would require tribal casinos to pay 25% of their revenues to the state and abide by new environmental and consumer protection requirements.  If any tribe refused, non-tribal racetracks and cardrooms would be allowed to install slot machines.  Backers have already spent in excess of $24 million.  The measure is supported by racetrack owners and opposed by tribes and Governor Schwarzenegger.  There has been some confusion among voters about Prop. 68 because of a second gambling measure on the ballot-Prop. 70, supported by the governor and tribes.  Prop. 68 remains on the ballot, even though supporters will stop campaigning for it this week.  The October 7 Los Angeles Times highlighted Gov. Schwarzenegger’s support for Prop. 70, which would require tribes to hand over 8.84% of their gambling revenues to the state, and in return give them the right to establish unlimited gambling on tribal lands.

Drug Policy-Alaska, Montana

The Anchorage Daily News reported on October 7 that the group supporting Measure 2, an initiative that would legalize marijuana, is one of the best-funded ballot measure campaigns in history.  The group has already spent over $500 million on TV and radio ads, brochures, phone banks and staff.  The majority of the group’s money comes from the Washington DC-based Marijuana Policy Project.

The Missoulian reported on the opposition of Scott Burns, deputy director of the White House’s Office of National Drug Control Policy, to the proposal to legalize marijuana for medical purposes.  Burns is touring the state, speaking to law enforcement groups about federal drug policy.

Transportation-Missouri

The Kansas City Star ran a story on October 7 that does a good job of explaining Amendment 3, a constitutional amendment that would redirect gas & high way tax revenues from the general fund into transportation projects.

Immigration-Arizona

An anti-immigrant measure on the ballot in Arizona has significant support among voters, the Arizona Republic reported on October 7.  57% approved of the measure, 20% opposed it, and the remaining 23% were undecided.  The poll has a margin of +/-4%.  Support has slipped some since early September, however, when 66% supported the measure.  The measure would require immigrants seeking state and local benefits to prove they are in the U.S. legally, and would require everyone registering to vote in Arizona prove their U.S. citizenship.

Abortion-Florida

The Palm Beach Post on October 7 ran a story about Florida’s proposed parental notification requirement for girls under 18 seeking an abortion.  The issue has a long history in Florida, and this year’s attempt is not the first to pass such a law.

Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001