Skip to Page Content
Home  |  Contact Us  |  Press Room  |  Site Overview  |  Help  |  Login  |  Register
Add to MyNCSL

Health Care

State Laws Mandating or Regulating Mental Health Benefits

Updated: July 2007; reposted: December 1, 2007

Mental health services have been one significant part of medical care for a number of years. However, the costs, coverage and availability of such services have been the object of policy discussions and a variety of state legislation. There is not a general consensus that state government should require coverage for mental health. 46 states currently have some type of enacted law but these laws vary considerably and can be divided roughly into three categories:

  1. mental health "parity" or equal coverage laws
  2. minimum mandated mental health benefit laws
  3. mandated mental health "offering laws".

Note that some laws apply primarily to "serious mental illness" and may not assure coverage for current circumstances. Many private market health plans include some type of mental health benefits on a voluntary commercial basis, not necessarily required by state or federal laws. Note that grief counseling may not be considered a covered benefit under some state laws, although it may be offered by insurers as part of a standard mental health benefit package. Laws in 21 states include coverage for substance abuse, alcohol or drug addiction. Most laws listed below were enacted prior to 2001.  In 2002 laws were added in Alabama, Colorado, Kentucky, New Hampshire and New Jersey.

In 2003, "barebones" laws allowing exceptions to mandated coverage, were enacted in Colorado, Montana and Texas.   Maine expanded categories of illnesses covered; Hawaii and Kansas extended dates of existing coverage laws.

In 2005, Washington enacted a full mental health parity law, applying to health insurance, but exempting policies for individuals and small group employers with 50 or fewer employees.  It will take effect in phases between 2006 and 2010.  Oregon also enacted a full parity law that took effect January 1, 2007.

In 2006-07, three additional states passed full parity laws.  New York's former Gov. George Pataki signed Timothy’s Law, named for a 12-year-old boy who committed suicide in 2001. The law requires that all private insurance policies have the same deductibles, number of office visits, number of inpatient visits and co-payments for mental health disorders as for other illnesses. The statute also requires that private plans provide at least 30 days of inpatient and 20 days of outpatient mental health care per year. In Ohio, outgoing Gov. Bob Taft signed his state’s first mental health parity law (SB 116) on Dec. 29, 2006. The Mental Health Parity Act mandates that coverage provided for seven “biologically based mental illnesses,” such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder be on par with those for physical conditions.  
In July 2007 The North Carolina legislature enacted a maesure covering nine consitions.
See "TWO MORE STATES ENACT PARITY LAWS," State Health Notes, 1/22/07
North Carolina: Mental-health parity clears last hurdle; Legislature is ready to send bill to Easley. - Winston-Salem Journal, 7/13/07.

 

The state laws noted below generally do not apply to federally funded public programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, the Veterans Administration, etc. Also, "self-funded" health insurance plans, often sponsored by the largest employers, usually are entirely exempt from state regulation because of the federal ERISA law.

Mental Health Parity Laws
Parity, as it relates to mental health and substance abuse, prohibits insurers or health care service plans from discriminating between coverage offered for mental illness, serious mental illness, substance abuse, and other physical disorders and diseases. In short, parity requires insurers to provide the same level of benefits for mental illness, serious mental illness or substance abuse as for other physical disorders and diseases. These benefits include visit limits, deductibles, copayments, and lifetime and annual limits.
Parity laws contain many variables that affect the level of coverage required under the law. Some state parity laws--such as Arkansas'--provide broad coverage for all mental illnesses. Other state parity laws limit the coverage to a specific list of biologically based or serious mental illnesses. The state laws labeled full parity below provide equal benefits, to varying degrees, for the treatment of mental illness, serious mental illness and biologically based mental illness, and may include treatment for substance abuse. There is no federal law on parity (as of November 2007); see background on unsuccessful federal parity legislation below the state table.

Minimum Mandated Benefit Laws
Many state laws require that some level of coverage be provided for mental illness, serious mental illness, substance abuse or a combination thereof. They are not considered full parity because they allow discrepancies in the level of benefits provided between mental illnesses and physical illnesses. These discrepancies can be in the form of different visit limits, copayments, deductibles, and annual and lifetime limits. Some mental health advocates believe these laws offer a compromise to full parity that at least provides some level of care. Others feel that anything other than full parity is discrimination against the mentally ill. Some of these laws specify that copayments and deductibles must be equal to those for physical illness up to the required level of benefits provided. If a law does not specify, the copayment could be as much as 50 percent of the cost of the visit and require a separate deductible to be met before mental health visits will be covered.

Mandated Offering Laws
Mandated offering laws differ from the other two types of laws in that they do not require (or mandate) benefits be provided at all. A mandated offering law can do two things. First, it can require that an option of coverage for mental illness, serious mental illness, substance abuse or a combination thereof, be provided to the insured. This option of coverage can be accepted or rejected and, if accepted, will usually require an additional or higher premium. Second, a mandated offering law can require that if benefits are offered then they must be equal.


Full Parity, Mandated Benefit and Mandated Offering State Laws

State

Eff. Date
Law citation/
web link.

Insurance Policies
Affected by Law.

Illnesses Covered. (1)

Type of Benefit/

Co-pays and
Co-insurance

AL

2001:
H.677 of 2000

Individual and group with a small employer exemption of 50 or less.

Mental illness.

Mandated offering.

Must be equal.

AL

2002:
S. 293

Adds health care service plans and health maintenance organizations (signed 4/26/02)

Mental illness

Mandated offering

Must be equal

AZ

1998:
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. 20-2322

Group with small employer exemption 50 or less, or cost increase of 1% or more.

Mental illness.

Mandate for plans that offer benefits.

Can be different.

AR

1997:
§23-00-506
[Act 1020 of '97]

Group: small employer exemption 50 or less; cost increase 1.5% or more.

Mental illnesses and develop-
mental disorders.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

CA

1974:
Cal. Ins. Code § 10125

Group.

Mental or nervous disorders.

Mandated offering.

Not specified.

CA

2000:
Cal. Ins. Code § 10144.5

Group, individual and HMO.

Severe mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

CO

1992:
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-16-104(5)

Group.

Mental illness excluding autism.

Mandated benefits.

Shall not exceed 50% of the payment. Deductible shall not differ.

CO

1998:
§10-16-104(5.5)

Group.

Biologically
-based mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

CO

2002:
Chapter 208 of 2002

Provide coverage for substance abuse treatment regardless of whether the treatment is voluntary or court-ordered. (signed 5/28/02)

Substance abuse

clarification

 

CO

2003:
H 1164

Allows exceptions for barebones policies

 

exceptions

 

CT

2000:
Conn. Gen. Stat. §38a-488a;
§38a-514a

Group
and individual.

Mental or nervous conditions; alcoholism and drug addiction.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

DE

1999:
Del. Code Ann. Tit. 18 § 3343
Tit. 18 § 3566

Group and individual.

Serious mental illnesses.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

FL

1992:
Fla. Stat. § 627.668

Group and HMO.

Mental and nervous disorders.

Mandated offering.

May be different after minimum benefits are met.

GA

1998:
Ga. Code
§33-24-29;
§33-24-28.1


Group
and individual.

Mental disorders including substance abuse.

Mandated offering.

Must be equal.

HI

1999:
Hawaii Rev. Stat. §431M-5

Group and individual with small employer exemption-
25 or less employees.

Serious mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be
equal.

HI

1988:
Hawaii Rev. Stat. §431M-1 ~7

Individual, group and HMO.

Mental illness.

Mandated benefits.

Must be comparable.

HI

2003:
S 1321

Makes law permanent, deleting sunset dates.

Mental illness.

Full parity

 

IL

1991:
Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 215 §5/370c

Group.

Mental, emotional or
nervous disorders.

Full parity 2005

Mandated offering, 1991-2004

Insured may be required to pay up to 50% of the expenses incurred.

IN

2000:
H.1108 of '99;
Ind. Code § 27-13-7-14.8

Ind. Code § 5-10-8-9 (state)

Group, individual and state employees with a small employer exemption 50 or less, or cost increase of 4% or more.

Mental illness.

Mandate for plans that offer benefits.
Full parity for state employee plans.

Must be
equal for
plans that
offer
coverage.
Full parity
for state
employee
plans.

IN

2003:
H 1135

Adds substance abuse benefit for those with mental illnesses

Substance abuse

Mandate for those with mental illnesses

 

KS

1998:
§ 40-2,105
2001:
H.2033 of '01
H 2071 of 2003

Group, individual, HMO and state employee plans.

H. 2071 extended sunset to Dec. 31, 2003.

Alcoholism or drug abuse or mental conditions.

Mandated benefits.

Not
specified.

KY

1986:
Ky. Rev. Stat.
§§ 304.17-318
[group]
§§304.38-193 [HMO]

Group.

Mental illness.

Mandated offering.

To the same extent as coverage for physical illness.

KY

2000:
HB 268

Group with small employer exemption of 50 or less.

Mental illness and alcohol and other drug abuse.

Mandate for plans that offer benefits.

Equal if offered.

KY

2002:
H 391 of '02

Small employer exemption raised to 51.

 

 

 

LA

2000:
La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 22:669(1)

Group, HMO and state employee benefit plans.

Serious mental illness.

Mandated benefits.

Must be equal.

LA

1982:
§ 22:669(2)

Group, self-insured and state employee plans.

Mental illness.

Mandated offering.

Must be equal.

LA

1982:
§22:215.5

Group.

Alcoholism and drug abuse.

Mandated offering.

Not specified.

ME

1996:
Me. Rev. Stat.
Tit. 24 § 2325-A

Group with a small employer exemption for 20 or less.

Mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

ME

1996:
Me. Rev. Stat.
tit. 24 § 2325-A(5-D)

Individual plans must offer coverage.

Mental illness.

Mandated offering.

Must be equal.

ME

2003:
H 973

Group of 21 or more, including HMOs, adds substance abuse-related disorders and other illness categories.

Substance abuse, etc.

Full parity

 

MD

1994:
Md. Ins. Code Ann. § 15-802

Individual and group.

Mental illness, emotional disorder, drug abuse or alcohol abuse disorder.

Full parity

Must be equal. except otpt. 80% -visits 1-5; 65% - visits 6-30;
50% visits over 30.

MD

2002:
Chapter 394 of '02 (eff. 10/1/02)

Requires individual and group insurers, nonprofit health service plans, and HMOs to provide coverage for medically necessary residential crisis services.

Residential crisis services

 

 

MA

1996:
Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 175:47B

Individual, group and HMO.

Mental or nervous conditions.

Mandated benefits.

Not specified.

MA

2001:
S.2036/ Ch. 80 of '00

Individual, group and HMO.

Biologically-based mental illness.

Full Parity for bio-based; mandated benefits of mental illness and substance abuse.

Must be equal.

MI

2001:
S.1209 of '00, see §3501

HMO's only, group and individual contracts, with a cost exemption of 3%.

Mental health and substance abuse

Minimum mandated benefits.

Charges, conditions for services shall not be less favorable than the maximum for any other comparable service.

MN

1995; 2000:
Minn. Stat. § 62A.152

Group, individual and HMO's (full parity for HMO's).

Mental health and chemical dependency.

Full parity for plans that offer coverage and HMO's.

Must be equal.

MS

1975:
Miss. Code Ann. § 83-9-39 to 41

Group.

Alcoholism.

Mandated benefit.

Not specified.

MS

2002:
Miss. Code Ann. § 83-9-41;
H667 of '01

Group and individual with a cost exemption of 1%.

Mental illness.

Mandated offering for small employers of 100 or less. Minimum mandated benefits for others.

Must be equal for inpatient and partial, however, payment for outpatient visits shall be a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of covered expenses.

MO

1997:
§§ 376.825;
§ 376.811

Group, individual and HMO.

Mental disorders and chemical dependency.

Mandated offering.

Must be equal.

MO

2000:
§ 376.825
H.191 of '99

Group and individual.

Mental illness including alcohol and drug abuse.

Mandate for plans that offer benefits.

Shall not be unreason-
able in
relation to the cost of services provided for mental illness.

MT

2000:
Mont. Code Ann. § 33-22-706

Group and individual.

Severe mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

MT

1997; 2001
Mont. Code Ann. § 33-22-701 to 705

Group.

Mental illness alcoholism and drug addiction.

Mandated benefits.

No less favorable up to maximums.

MT

2003:
H 384

12 month pilot allows exceptions for barebones policies.

 

Exceptions

 

NE

2000:
§§ 44-791 to 44-795

Group and HMO with a small employer exemption of 15 or less.

Serious mental illness.

Mandate for plans that offer coverage.

May be different.

NV

2000:
Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 689A.0455;
689B.0359;
695B.1938;
695C.1738

Group and individual with a small employer exemption 25 or less, or cost increases of 2% or more.

Severe mental illness.

Mandated benefits.

Not more than 150% of out-of-
pocket expenses required for medical and surgical.

NH

1993:
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann.
§§ 415:18-a

Group, individual and HMO. Specifies different benefits for mental illness under major medical and non-major medical plans.

Mental or nervous conditions.

Mandated benefits.

Ratio of benefits shall be substantially the same as benefits for other illnesses.

NH

1995:
§ 417:E-1

Group.

Biologically- based mental illnesses

Full parity.

Must be equal.

NH

2002:
H 762; Chapter 204 of 2002

Any policy of group or blanket accident or health insurance.

Parity for bio- based illnesses, mandated benefits for other MI's and substance abuse

 

 

NJ

1999:
§§ 17:48-6v;
17-48A-7u;
17B:26-2.1s

Group and individual

Biologically- based mental illnesses

Full parity.

Must be equal.

NM

2000:
N.M. Stat. Ann. §59A-23E-18

Group with different exemptions for small and large employers.

Mental health benefits.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

NY

2006:

 

--------------
1998:
Ins. Law § 3221(1)(5)(A)

All private insurance policies.
See: Timothy’s Law web site, 2007.

--------------
Group.

mental health disorders

------------
Mental, nervous, or emotional disorders and alcoholism and substance abuse.

Full parity

 

---------
Mandated
Offering.

Must be equal.  State to foot the bill for additional costs incurred by businesses with fewer than 50 employees; the Legislature allocated some $50 million to cover those costs
-----------
As deemed appropriate and are consistent with those for other benefits

NC 2007:   Health Insurers     Full parity for Mental illness conditions. 

NC

1997:
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 58-51-55

State employee plans only

Mental illness and chemical dependency.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

ND

1995:
N.D. Cent. Code § 26.1-36-09 [page 431]

Group and HMO.

Mental disorders, alcoholism and drug addiction.

Mandated benefits.

No deductible or copay for first 5 hours not to exceed 20% for remaining hours.

ND

2003:
H 2210

Adds that inpatient treatment and partial hospitalization, or alternative treatment must be provided by an addiction treatment program licensed under chapter 50-31.

Substance abuse

Clarification

 

OH

2006:
SB 116

----------
1985:
Ohio Rev. Code Ann.§ 3923.30

 

Law signed 12/29/06; effective

---------------
Group and self-insured.

7 “biologically based mental illnesses,” such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
---------------------
Mental or nervous disorders and alcoholism.

Full Parity

 

-----------
Mandate for plans that offer mental health coverage. Mandated benefits for alcoholism.

 

 

-------------
Subject to reasonable deductibles and coinsurance.

OK

2000:
Okla. Stat. tit. 36 §6060.11 to §6060.12

Group with a small employer exemption 50 or less, or cost increase of 2% or more.

Severe mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

OR

2000:
Or. Rev. Stat § 743.556

2005:
SB 913

Group and HMO.

Group.
(news article 1/1/07)

Mental or nervous conditions including alcoholism and chemical dependency.

Mandated benefits.


2007: Full parity New item

Shall be no greater than those for other illnesses.

PA

1999
H.366 of 1998, (see § 634)

Group and HMO-small employer exemption 50 or less.

Serious mental illness.

Mandated benefits.

Must not prohibit access to care.

RI

1995
R.I. Gen. Laws § 27-38-2.1

Individual,
group, self-insured and HMO.
(in effect through 12/31/2001)

Serious mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

RI

1/1/2002
H.5478/ S.832 of 2001

Expands the state mental health parity law to include coverage for all mental illnesses and substance abuse disorders.
(replaces § 27-38.2-1 above)

All mental illnesses & substance abuse disorders.

Full parity

Must be equal

SC

1994
S.C. Code Ann. § 38-71-737

Group.

Psychiatric conditions, including substance abuse.

Mandated offering.

May be different.

SC

1/1/2002

State employee insurance plan with cost increase exemptions.

Mental health condition or alcohol or substance abuse.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

SD

1998
§ 58-17-98

Group, individual and HMO.

Biologically- based mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

TN

2000
§ 56-7-2360;
§ 56-7-2601

Group with a small employer exemption 25 or less, or cost increase of 1% or more.

Mental or nervous conditions.

Mandated benefits.

Must be equal.

TX

1991

State employee plans.

Biologically-based mental illness.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

TX

1997
Ins. art. 3.51-14

Group and HMO, with a small employer exemption of 50 or less.

Serious mental illness.

Mandated benefits
with a mandated offering for small groups of 50 or less.

Must be equal.

TX

2003:
S 541

Allows insurers and HMOs to offer policies without mandates for the treatment of mental illness and chemical dependency, with an exception for serious mental illnesses.

 

Exceptions

 

UT

2001
Utah Code Ann. 31A-22-625

Group (as of 7/1/01) and HMO's (as of 1/1/01)

Mental illness as defined by the DSM.

Mandated offering.

May include a restriction.

VT

1998
Vt. Stat. Ann.
tit. 8 §4089b

Group and individual.

Mental health condition including alcohol and substance abuse.

Full parity.

Must be equal.

VA

2000 thru
7/1/2004 & indefinitely

Va. Code. § 38.2-3412.1

Group and individual with a small group exemption 25 or less.
(Note: Extended without sunset date by S 44, see below)

Biologically-based mental illness including drug and alcohol addiction.

Full parity.

Must be equal to achieve the same outcome as treatment for any other illness.

VA

Effective 7/1/2004.
§ 38.2-3412.1

Group, individual and HMO. 
(See 2004 change, below)

Mental health and substance abuse.

Mandated benefits.

Co-insurance for otpt. can be no more than 50% after 5th visit. All others must be equal.

VA

S 44 of '04

Repeals sunset date of 7/1/04, above.
(enacted 3/19/04)

Mental health and substance abuse.

   

   

VA

S 212 of '04 
§§ 37.1-255

Establishes Inspector General for Mental Health

 Mental health
& substance
abuse

   

   

WA

1987
Wash. Rev. Code § 48.21.240

Group and HMO.

Mental health treatment.

Mandated offering.

Reasonable deductible amounts and co-payments.

WA

2005
HB 1154
(effective 2006-10)

health insurance; with small group & individuals exempt   mental health treatment     full parity

WV

1998
§ 33-16-3a

Group and individual with a cost increase exemption of 1%.

Mental or nervous conditions.

Mandated offering.

Not specified.

WV

2002
H 4039

 

Mental illness & substance abuse

Full parity

 

 WI

Wis. Stat. § 632.89 

Group (with "at least specified minimum benefits in every group contract")

Mental or nervous disorders

Mandated offering 

Comparable deductibles and copays


NOTES for state mental health statute chart:
A)
The Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM) includes universally accepted definitions and descriptions of mental illnesses and conditions. There are 13 DSM diagnoses commonly referred to as biologically-based mental illnesses by mental health providers and consumer organizations. Between 3 and 13 of these diagnoses are referred to in various state parity laws. For example, in Alabama, mental illness is defined as: 1) schizophrenia, schizophrenia form disorder, schizo-affective disorder; 2) bipolar disorder; 3) panic disorder; 4) obsessive-compulsive disorder; 5) major depressive disorder; 6) anxiety disorders; 7) mood disorders; 8) Any condition or disorder involving mental illness, excluding alcohol and substance abuse, that falls under any of the diagnostic categories listed in the mental disorders section of the International Classification of Disease, as periodically revised.

B) Examples of "Barebones" exception laws:

  • Colorado H 1164 allows small employers to purchase a basic health benefit plan that does not include mental health and substance abuse treatment mandates.
  • Texas S 541allows insurers and HMOs to offer policies without mandates for the treatment of mental illness and chemical dependency, with an exception for serious mental illnesses if the plan is issued to a large employer. An insurer that offers such policy must also offer at least one policy with state-mandated health benefits.
  • Montana H 384, allows for a 12-month demonstration project that in some cases, permits a limited coverage plan or managed care plan without mandates for mental illness

Federal Parity Amendment
In 1996 a federal parity amendment was signed into law as part of the VA-HUD appropriations bill. The law, otherwise known as the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-204, see text online), prohibits group health plans that offer mental health benefits from imposing more restrictive annual or lifetime limits on spending for mental illness than are imposed on coverage of physical illnesses. This law expired on September 30, 2001 due to a "sunset" provision, but was extended through December 31, 2002 when President Bush signed Public Law 107-116.  The Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 offers limited parity for the treatment of mental health disorders.  The statute does not require insurers to offer mental health benefits, but states that if mental health coverage is offered, the benefits must be equal to the annual or lifetime limits offered for physical health care. It also does not apply to substance use disorders, and businesses with fewer than 26 employees are exempt..

On October 30, 2001 the U.S. Senate passed a broader parity bill, which was sent to the House. On December 18, in a House-Senate negotiating meeting, the House members rejected the Senate bill by a 10n-7y vote. The New York Times reported that sponsors Senators Domenici and Wellstone "said they wanted to requires health plans and insurance companies to provide equivalent coverage, or parity for mental and physical illness. House Republicans, employers and insurance companies objected to the proposal, saying it would increase costs for employers in a recession, when many businesses are already cutting health benefits because of a resurgence in medical inflation."6

9-11: Terrorism Impacts on Mental Health

The events of September 11, 2001 and related bio-terrorism scares had a profound effect on Americans in every part of the United States. In 2003, the war with Iraq brought the potential for new psychological and mental health concerns, according to the American Psychological Association. Yet the issues raised have been a part of health policy for more than two decades.

The nation, through the actions of federal, state and local governments, and citizens in innumerable roles, united and moved forward. However, the medical traumatic effects of those events impacted many people, for months or even years. USA Today reported it this way: "The terrorist strikes and their devastating aftermath are triggering the largest mental health challenge ever faced by employers and straining the USA's army of grief counselors, not just at the attack sites but in workplaces across the country.  The emotional fallout was expected to be so widespread that some health insurers are loosening restrictions on employees' use of mental health services." [1] The impact could be far larger than the numbers directly affected. For example, just in Arlington County, Virginia, "some 20,000 to 40,000 of the county's 200,000 residents could experience a traumatic stress reaction from the attacks, officials estimate, pointing to an earlier Surgeon General's report on mental health and disasters." [2]

Mental Health Benefits and Hurricane Katrina Victims

The widespread harm inflicted by Hurricane Katrina includes health impacts and longer-term mental and emotional harm.  People who are displaced, injured, have lost loved ones, homes, property, belongings, jobs, family stability, pets, and those with friends, relatives or coworkers affected, may need or seek counseling and medical help.  Some, but not all, of the varying state health insurance mandate laws may require coverage of either emergency or longer-term mental health services.Emergency Sign

The list below is a general survey of these laws.  It provides a quick comparison among states, but it is not intended as a consumer guide to services, since coverage varies even further based on employer and individual contracts, including services offered above or beyond the minimum required by state law.  Also public programs including Medicaid, Medicare, local health departments have separate standards of coverage - sometimes more extensive -- than private market health policies.

Expert Sources and Reports

1. U.S. General Accounting Office, "Mental Health Parity Act: Despite Federal Standards, Mental Health Benefits Remain Limited" GAO/HEHS-00-95 (Washington, D.C., May 2000) [includes state charts]
2. U.S. General Accounting Office, "Health Insurance Regulation: Varying State Requirements Affect Cost of Insurance, GAO/HEHS-96-161 (Washington, D.C: August 1996).
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, "The Costs and Effects of Parity for Mental Health" (Merrille Sing, Mathematica, 2001)
4. National Center for Policy Analysis, An Easy Way to Make Health Insurance More Expensive, February 21, 1997. (Obtained from www.public-policy.org/~ncpa/ba/ba224.html; Internet.)
5.  "New Oregon law will require parity in mental health coverage" - Statesman-Journal, 1/1/07.
6. Gail A. Jensen and Dr. Michael A. Morrisey, Mandated Benefit Laws and Employer- Sponsored Health Insurance, (Health Insurance Association of America: January 1999).
7. "Drive for More Mental Health Coverage Fails in Congress", New York Times, December 18, 2001

For related news stories and resources see:

NCSL Health Home Page

Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001