|
|
Home | Contact Us | Press Room | Site Overview | Help | Login | Register |
![]() |
![]() |
| About NCSL | State & Federal Issues | Legislatures | Legislative Staff | Meetings | Bookstore | Legislators & Staff Only |
| NCSL Home > State & Federal Issues: Issue Areas > Health > Forum on State Health Policy Leadership > | Add to MyNCSL |
|
|
|
FY 2004 (9) |
FY 2003 (10) |
FY 2002 (12) |
FY 2001 (9) |
FY 2000 (11) |
| American Samoa | District of Columbia | Alabama | Arizona | Arkansas |
| Guam | Florida | Georgia | California | Delaware |
| Kentucky | Mississippi | Hawaii | Colorado | Illinois |
| Louisiana | Missouri | Indiana | Connecticut | Iowa |
| Michigan | Nebraska | Maine | Idaho | Kansas |
| North Carolina | New Mexico | Maryland | South Dakota | Massachusetts |
| Pennsylvania | North Dakota | Montana | Texas | Minnesota |
| Puerto Rico | Oklahoma | New Jersey | Utah | New Hampshire |
| Tennessee | Rhode Island | South Carolina | Washington | Oregon |
| Virginia | Virgin Islands | Vermont | ||
| West Virginia | Wisconsin | |||
| Wyoming |
The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured recently sponsored two sessions on Medicaid that offer a lot of information at different levels. Both the webcasts allow you to hear the speakers, see their transcripts and view related documents.
An introductory briefing on Medicaid, given to Congressional staff, can provide a refresher for you or an introduction to this complex program for new members and staff. It features presentations by KCMU president Diane Rowland, Rodney Whitlock of the Republican staff of the Senate Finance Committee, and the Executive Director of the National Academy for State Health Policy, Alan Weil. The session, with related documents, is available on line, for http://www.kaisernetwork.org/health_cast/hcast_index.cfm?display=detail&hc=1373
For another level of discussion, a recent session on possible policy changes in Medicaid from Kaiser is a “meet the experts” with Jim Frogue, state project director, Center for Health Transformation; Alan Weil, executive director, National Academy for State Health Policy ; and Jeanne Lambrew, Ph.D. http://www.kaisernetwork.org/health_cast/hcast_index.cfm?display=detail&hc=1406
Medicaid waivers are where states—and the federal government--do most of their experimenting with the program. Samantha Artiga and Cindy Mann are the authors of a new analysis of recent waivers and their policy implication. New Directions for Medicaid Section 1115 Waivers: Policy Implications of Recent Waiver Activity examines the 17 waivers that have been approved since January 2001. The brief and a companion fact sheet may be reached from http://www.kff.org/medicaid/7286.cfm
To learn more about a specific state’s waivers, including older ones and more targeted waivers as well, visit the Department of Health and Human Serices’ clickable map at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/medicaid/waivers/waivermap.asp
The National Health Policy Forum has released three new reports that provide in-depth looks at some issues related to innovations in the private insurance market. The reports, about 30 pages long, give the historical and legislative background of these programs, details on how they operate, and an exploration of various policy proposals currently being considered. Health Savings Accounts: The Fundamentals, by Beth Fuchs and Julia A. James and Fundamentals of Underwriting in the Nongroup Health Insurance Market: Access to Coverage and Options for Reform by Mark Merlis and Health Insurance Coverage for Small Employers by Dawn M. Gencarelli can all be found at http://www.nhpf.org/.
To see what individual insurance market policies prevail in one state, see the California Health Care Foundation’s updated issue brief on rules affecting California’s individual market. The page also links to briefs about California’s small group and managed care regulations. http://www.chcf.org/topics/healthinsurance/index.cfm?itemID=20739&subTopic=CL500&subsection=reports
The Commonwealth Fund has released two reports that take a skeptical look at the market for health savings accounts (HSAs) among the uninsured. “The Effect of Health Savings Accounts on Health Insurance Coverage,” by Sherry A. Glied and Dahlia K. Remler can be downloaded at http://www.cmwf.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=274002 and “How High Is Too High? Implications of High-Deductible Health Plans,” by Karen Davis, Michelle M. Doty and Alice Ho, which concludes that even these plans are likely to be unaffordable for most of the uninsured. http://www.cmwf.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=274007
The Schiavo tragedy caught the nation’s attention. Some groups have been working for years to help individuals and providers communicate clearly about their final wishes and think through these hard decisions so that choices can remain private.
Caring Connections has information about end-of-life care including sections on care giving, pain management, grief, hospice, and advanced directives including links to state documents for advanced directives. http://www.caringinfo.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=1 .
From Aging with Dignity, a comprehensive alternative to other living wills is the “Five Wishes” document. Five Wishes helps its users to be clear about their preferences in regards to “medical, personal, emotional and spiritual” aspects of end-of-life care. The site also includes discussion of how to talk about these choices with family and caregivers. Over two-thirds of states accept this document as an alternative to a living will. http://www.agingwithdignity.org/states.html
The National Right to Life Project presents the same information framed in terms of a “will to live,” explaining how to give precise and clear advanced directives that take into account a variety of possible circumstances. http://www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/willtolive/index.html
The National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) has been conducting an end-of-life-care project for several years. In addition to issues related to advanced directives, they have been a voice for states in regards to pain management for terminally ill patients. A report on activities in a dozen states, links to state sites, and reports including a collection of thumbnails on 30 state coalitions can be found at http://www.naag.org/issues/issue-endoflife.php
Simple illustrated advanced directives forms may be found in English and Spanish at the Institute for Healthcare Advancement’s (IHA) site. The forms help people with limited literacy create a California advanced directive. They would need to be adapted for use in other states. According to IHA, “Results from the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey showed that nearly 90 million American adults, or nearly one of every two adults, could not function above the lowest 2 levels of literacy.” Check out the good information and materials on the rest of the site. Low literacy can be an obstacle to good health, especially for many people on public programs. http://www.iha4health.org/index.cfm?menuitemid=112&menusubid=41
April has been abloom with quality activity.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) unveiled its annual quality and disparity reports, which included detailed comparative data for states on a very wide array of health, medical care and wellness indicators. State-level compilations can be accessed at http://www.qualitytools.ahrq.gov/qualityreport/state/ and the entire report can be viewed at http://www.qualitytools.ahrq.gov/qualityreport/ . You can review the reports, search by indicators, look at state specific profiles, and browse tables with comparative state data. Data tables are in the appendix and may be accessed through links in the report or directly downloaded
CMS unveiled its hospital quality comparison program, Hospital Compare. The site lists detailed quality measures for hospitals participating in the Hospital Quality Alliance: Improving Care through Information http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/
The Inpatient Quality Indicators for Colorado Hospitals provide complementary consumer performance measures for eleven risk-adjusted mortality (death) indicators and four volume indicators for all Colorado full-service hospitals. http://www.hospitalquality.org/
The site includes links to similar compilations in New York http://www.myhealthfinder.com/newyork/#measures and Texas.
Finally, to see how this reporting is done by a medical center that has been a national leader in quality measurement, here is how New Hampshire’s Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center provides information to its community. http://www.dhmc.org/qualitymeasures/default.cfm
Tobacco settlement allocation is the subject of a new GAO report, which includes state-by-state details. The March 2005 report, Tobacco Settlement: States’ Allocations of Fiscal Year 2004 and Expected Fiscal Year 2005 Payments finds that states are beginning to turn away from using these funds to relieve budgetary shortfalls and plan to allocate more for health programs and debt service on securitized funds in the coming year. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05312.pdf
And what are you spending on tobacco prevention? An interactive map from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) has clickable state information in a “web interactive” posted March 16 at http://www.rwjf.org/newsroom/interactiveslist.jsp (and while you are there, take a look at the state information on nurse shortages posted the following week.)
The National ADAP Monitoring Report, 2005 is the ninth in a series of annual compilations of information about state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) from the Kaiser Family Foundation and the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD). ADAPS provide HIV/AIDS-related prescription drugs to uninsured and underinsured individuals living with HIV/AIDS. The Kaiser foundation provides links to the report, state formularies, fact sheets and an audioconference about the findings at http://www.kff.org/hivaids/hiv042005pkg.cfm . Other materials from NASTAD’s April 19 meeting on are at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/health_cast/hcast_index.cfm?display=detail&hc=1408.
NASTAD’s site has a wide variety of resources including state-specific funding data and links to programs in each state. http://www.nastad.org/
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration just released updated figures on national expenditures for Mental Health Services and Substance Abuse Treatment. The report tackles the following questions:
Among several key findings, the report found that costs for the treatment of MHSA disorders were $104 billion in 2001, up from $60 billion in 1991, an average annual growth of 5.6 percent. Mental health spending totaled $85 billion in 2001, which was 6.2 percent of all health care spending. At $18 billion in 2001, substance abuse spending comprised 1.3 percent of all health care spending. Both mental health and substance abuse programs experienced large increases in the amount of public spending from 1991 to 2001—from 57 to 63 percent and 62 to 76 percent, respectively. The role of Medicaid—an already crucial public payer—grew in significance for both systems.
To access the full report, go to: http://www.samhsa.gov/spendingestimates/toc.aspx
Actual and per capita state spending as of 2001 can be found at http://www.mentalhealth.org/databases/databases_exe.asp?D1=CA&Type=PC&Myassign=list
An excellent resource for information on state activities is the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. A list of their recent publications can be found at http://www.nasmhpd.org/publications.cfm
Dick Merritt, Group Director
Forum for State Health Policy Leadership
National Conference of State Legislatures
ph: 202-624-8698 fx: 202-737-1069
dick.merritt@ncsl.org
Kala Ladenheim, Ph. D. Program Manager
Forum for State Health Policy Leadership
National Conference of State Legislatures
ph: 202-624-3557 fx: 202-737-1069
kala.ladenheim@ncsl.org
© 2008 National Conference of State Legislatures, All Rights Reserved
Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001