|
|
Home | Contact Us | Press Room | Site Overview | Help | Login | Register |
![]() |
![]() |
| About NCSL | State & Federal Issues | Legislatures | Legislative Staff | Meetings | Bookstore | Legislators & Staff Only |
| NCSL Home > State & Federal Issues: Issue Areas >Health > | Add to MyNCSL |
2002 SNAPSHOT:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
States where actions have been taken, including the introduction or enactment of legislation, revision or enactment of regulations, or the submission of revised Medicaid plans. |
States that have completed all steps required to accept the new Medicaid option. |
States that have taken no action toward adopting the new Medicaid option. |
BACKGROUND
On October 24th, 2000, President William Clinton signed into law the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-354 (PDF-115K)*). This Act gives states the option to provide medical assistance through Medicaid to eligible women who were screened for and found to have breast or cervical cancer, including precancerous conditions, through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).
NBCCEDP, which is administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provides free breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up diagnostic services to women in need, such as those who are uninsured or have low incomes. In 2000, CDC began its 10th year of this landmark program, supporting early detection programs in all 50 states, 6 U.S. territories, the District of Columbia, and 12 American Indian and Alaska Native organizations.
Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), which administers the Medicaid program, and CDC care continue to develop guidance on how to adopt the new Medicaid option. On January 4, 2001, HCFA released a memo to state health officials. The memo, HCFA Guidance on Implementing PL 106-354 contains a form required to revise Medicaid plans to accept the new Medicaid option. HCFA launched a new comprehensive webpage at http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/bccpt/default.htm devoted to answering questions and providing guidance on the implementation of the breast and cervical cancer treatment option.
CURRENT STATUS
A LOOK INTO THE FUTURE
Even with such a flurry of activity, some states are struggling with securing funding for the new program. For many states, budget deficits, primarily due to Medicaid spending, loom large on the horizon. To date, at least Idaho, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas have either delayed implementation or have threatened to eliminate the program as a means of addressing Medicaid shortfalls. Other states, such as Nevada and Washington, are looking to trim their Medicaid budgets elsewhere, while committing to move forward with implementing the treatment program.
In Massachusetts, Governor Jane Swift froze funds earmarked for breast and cervical cancer treatment and other programs because her administration believed that the money was needed for other state services. A sharp drop in tax revenues has found the state in a fiscal crisis. The American Cancer Society and other health activists are suing the administration to restore the funding.
In Kentucky, state lawmakers ended a special session without having a budget. If no budget is in place by July 1, officials fear a delay in the implementation of new health initiatives such as the treatment program.
Below is a chart that summarizes all state actions related to implementing the federal Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act.
|
State |
Legislation Introduced |
Legislation Enacted |
Source of State Funding (proposed and approved) |
Projections for State Share of Costs |
Rate of Federal Enhanced Match 2002 |
Amended State Medicaid Plan Approved |
|
|
2002 |
2003 |
||||||
|
Alabama |
X |
X |
General funds |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
79.50 |
X |
|
Alaska |
X |
X |
General funds |
175,800 |
189,500 |
69.02 |
X |
|
Arizona |
X |
X |
General funds |
1,300,000 |
1,400,000 |
76.70 |
X |
|
Arkansas |
X |
|
Cigarette tax |
|
|
81.84 |
X |
|
California |
X |
|
General funds |
5,200,000 |
|
65.00 |
X |
|
Colorado |
X |
X |
Tobacco settlement funds |
58,746 |
609,024 |
65.00 |
X |
|
Connecticut |
X |
X |
General funds |
1,673,717 |
|
65.00 |
X |
|
Delaware |
X |
Resolution adopted |
General funds |
|
|
65.00 |
X |
|
District of Columbia |
Finalizing regulations |
|
|
|
|
79.00 |
|
|
Florida |
X |
X |
General funds |
12,900,000 |
|
71.25 |
X |
|
Georgia |
|
|
General funds |
|
|
|
X |
|
Hawaii |
X |
X |
General and private funds |
236,000 |
236,000 |
70.78 |
X |
|
Idaho |
X |
X |
General funds |
283,000 |
|
79.37 |
X |
|
Illinois |
X |
X |
General funds |
|
|
65.00 |
X |
|
Indiana |
X |
X |
General funds |
536,000 |
673,000 |
73.40 |
X |
|
Iowa |
X |
X |
Tobacco settlement and private funds |
250,000 |
|
74.14 |
X |
|
Kansas |
X |
|
General funds |
336,000 |
|
71.78 |
X |
|
Kentucky |
X |
|
General funds |
300,000 |
300,000 |
78.72 |
|
|
Louisiana |
X |
X |
General funds |
700,000 |
|
79.70 |
X |
|
Maine |
X |
X |
General funds |
135,690 |
161,637 |
76.28 |
X |
|
Maryland |
|
|
General funds |
|
|
65.00 |
X |
|
Massachusetts |
X |
X |
General funds |
2,824,552 |
|
65.00 |
|
|
Michigan |
X |
X |
General funds |
|
|
68.44 |
X |
|
Minnesota |
X |
X |
General funds |
|
|
68.44 |
X |
|
Mississippi |
X |
X |
General funds |
|
|
83.59 |
X |
|
Missouri |
X |
X |
General funds |
|
|
72.73 |
X |
|
Montana |
X |
X |
Tobacco Settlement |
129,270 |
258,540 |
81.19 |
X |
|
Nebraska |
X |
X |
General funds |
230,000 |
|
71.94 |
X |
|
Nevada |
X |
|
General funds |
|
1,100,000 |
66.08 |
X |
|
New Hampshire |
|
|
General funds |
|
|
65.00 |
X |
|
New Jersey |
X |
X |
General funds |
|
|
65.00 |
X |
|
New Mexico |
X |
|
General funds |
|
1,600,000 |
82.12 |
|
|
New York |
X |
X |
General funds |
|
|
65.00 |
|
|
North Carolina |
X |
|
General funds |
621,315 |
1,215,239 |
73.72 |
X |
|
North Dakota |
X |
X |
Community Health Trust funds |
114,755 |
|
|
X |
|
Ohio |
X |
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
70.59 |
X |
|
Oklahoma |
X |
X |
General and private funds |
|
1,100,000 |
79.66 |
|
|
Oregon |
X |
X |
General funds |
323,736 |
|
71.48 |
X |
|
Pennsylvania |
X |
|
State Medical Assistance funds |
1,500,000 |
4,800,000 |
68.53 |
X |
|
Rhode Island |
X |
|
Cigarette tax |
236,000 |
|
68.64 |
X |
|
South Carolina |
|
|
General funds |
|
|
|
X |
|
South Dakota |
|
|
|
|
|
75.90 |
X |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Texas |
X |
X |
General funds |
1,200,000 |
|
72.17 |
|
|
Utah |
|
|
General funds |
117,500 |
|
79.53 |
X |
|
Vermont |
X |
X |
General funds |
|
|
73.99 |
X |
|
Virginia |
X |
X |
General funds |
350,000 |
|
65.43 |
X |
|
Washington |
X |
X |
General funds/private local appropriations |
900,000 |
|
65.00 |
X |
|
West Virginia |
X |
X |
Transfers funds to the Breast and Cervical Cancer Diagnostic Treatment Fund from the MCH Clinics, Clinicians, and Medical Contracts and Fees |
|
|
82.42 |
X |
|
Wisconsin |
X |
X |
|
|
|
70.91 |
X |
|
Wyoming |
|
|
|
|
|
73.68 |
X |
Sources: NCSL Health Policy Tracking Service; Center for Health Services Research and Policy, The George Washington University; Federal Funds Information for the States; National Breast Cancer Coalition.
Stephanie Wasserman, Senior Policy Specialist, Health Care Program
This site is made possible by program award U38/CCU814942-04 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Return to NCSL Health Home Page
© 2008 National Conference of State Legislatures, All Rights Reserved
Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001