|
|
Home | Contact Us | Press Room | Site Overview | Help | Login | Register |
![]() |
![]() |
| About NCSL | State & Federal Issues | Legislatures | Legislative Staff | Meetings | Bookstore | Legislators & Staff Only |
| NCSL Home > State & Federal Issues: Issue Areas >Health > | Add to MyNCSL |
Mapping Public Policy for Genetic TechnologiesChapter 9. Privacy
Genomics and its attendant technologies raise no new ethical or social questions, but they do involve important issues of equity and social policy. The most pressing of these concerns issues of medical information privacy. The key principle is to protect individuals against invasion of privacy (including the privacy of genetic information about them), while preserving the ability of academic, government and industrial researchers to use anonymous medical data (including genetic information) to pursue new scientific knowledge and discover new medical treatments. Medical information privacy issues before state legislatures are concerned with individual privacy and preventing abuses in employment, health and life insurance, family life, and criminal justice. Genetic testing produces personal medical information. The treatment of personal medical information raises important questions. These questions apply to a wide range of personal information, and are not limited only to the results of genetic tests. Questions being debated include:
Issues of PrivacyPrinciples of Privacy for Medical InformationA major point of discussion is whether genetic information should be separated and regulated distinctly from other medical information or whether it should be considered simply as another piece of critical medical information. Genetic information privacy clearly is important, but so is an individual’s medical history, HIV status, mental health record and a host of other data.Another major point involves private individuals versus research subjects. Rules must balance the control of research subjects over information and samples against the ability to conduct research. Restrictions on nonidentifiable genetic information and samples could severely hinder many research programs. Specifically, allowing individuals to arbitrarily revoke permission to use anonymous samples and information could destroy long-term research projects. Debate is focusing on whether rules should sharply distinguish anonymous samples and data from those that can be linked to an identifiable individual and whether, in fact, this can be done. Informed consent clearly may be required for the procedures that are used to collect certain kinds of samples or data (by biopsy, for example), but the question remains as to whether informed consent should be required for the collection and use of the data only where the data are personally identifiable. (Table 9-1 lists 1997 legislation introduced regarding confidentiality of patient information.) In summary, state legislators will continue to consider the following critical issues:
To Table 9-1. Confidentiality of Patient Medical Information Legislation Introduced in 1997
|
|||||||
© 2008 National Conference of State Legislatures, All Rights Reserved
Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001