Skip to Page Content
Home  |  Contact Us  |  Press Room  |  Site Overview  |  Help  |  Login  |  Register
Add to MyNCSL

Energy Assurance Exercise "Dark Sun" June 29-30, 2004

The US Department of Energy (DOE) held a one-and-one-half day energy assurance exercise at the Army training facility Camp Dawson, West Virginia. About 150 people attended the meeting, including three state legislators: Senator John Unger of West Virginia, Delegate Carol Petzold of Maryland, and Representative Carl Holmes of Kansas. Several state-based organizations were represented- the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), the National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO), the National Governors Association (NGA), and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). Other attendees represented state energy offices, regulatory commissions, other state agencies, national laboratories, federal agencies, and private sector energy companies.

Day One
The exercise began with an introduction by DOE staff to the types of interconnections that link the energy infrastructure with other critical infrastructure like telecommunications and transportation. These include physical, cyber, geographic, and logical interties. Attendees were encouraged to think of how interdependencies can change over the course of a long outage and/or frequent outages. Attendees then broke into groups to take part in the first of two energy emergency scenario exercises. After each exercise, groups reported findings back to the large group.

Scenario 1- Disruption to petroleum infrastructure on the Gulf Coast
Attendees viewed a video demonstrating a hypothetical terrorist bombing of an oil refinery, a foiled truck bombing at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and two explosions at pumping stations in Oklahoma. After receiving more details about the scenario from DOE, attendees split into groups that focused on the perspective of either public affairs, policy, operations, or system interdependencies. In their discussions, groups compared state emergency plans and agreed upon major short-term and long-term themes for handling and preventing this scenario.

Scenario 2- Disruption to electricity and natural gas infrastructures on the west Coast
The second scenario presented a hypothetical loss of transmission lines in California and attack on a natural gas compressor station serving California. In their groups, attendees addressed a broader range of the four perspectives outlined in the previous paragraph, but otherwise the group activity was similar to that of the first scenario.

Day Two
Don Milsten of the National Association of State Energy Officials and Jeff Pillon of the Michigan Public Service Commission presented a draft of a NASEO report which provides state policymakers with a primer on writing state energy assurance plans. The presentation highlighted the major sections of the report, including the need to clarify relationships and responsibilities among the agencies and officials who would be involved in an energy emergency; designing strategies and response measures for managing energy shortages, and managing public information needs.


Attendees learned that the federal government through DOE and DHS is working on guidance information and advice for states in planning energy emergency prevention and management. DHS holds videoconferences with governors, and DOE is coordinating EEAC, an Internet-based database of key energy emergency contacts in the states and in the federal government. States are also working together through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact and informal regional compacts in the Northeast and Midwest.

 

Top

Energy and Electric Utilities Menu Page

Visitor counts for this page.

Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001