DESIGNING EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS
NCSL Prekindergarten Leadership Institute Denver, CO – June 4-6, 2006
Dr. Thomas Schultz – The Pew Charitable Trusts – tschultz@pewtrusts.org Dr. Eugene Garcia,Arizona State University – eugene.garcia@asu.edu
SESSION OBJECTIVES
- EXPLAIN CURRENT FORMS OF ASSESSMENTS OF YOUNG CHILDREN AND EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAMS
- HIGHLIGHT CURRENT STATE AND FEDERAL MANDATES & SYSTEMS
- SUMMARIZE KEY CONCERNS OF EARLY CHILDHOOD LEADERS ON ACCOUNTABILITY AND ASSESSMENT ISSUES
- OUTLINE 4 MODELS FOR STATE PRE-K PROGRAM ACCOUNTABILITY
- ASK YOU 2 QUESTIONS TO HELP OUR NATIONAL TASK FORCE ON EARLY CHILDHOOD ACCOUNTABILITY
Kagan/Schultz
EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS AT-A-GLANCE
|
Program Assessments |
Child Assessments |
Child & Program Assessments |
|
System |
Who Is Assessed? |
Purpose |
System |
Who Is Assessed? |
Purpose |
System |
Who Is Assessed? |
Purpose |
|
Licensing
|
All programs serving young children
|
Determine compliance with health & safety standards |
Developmental
Screening |
All children |
Referral for special education
assessment |
Program
Evaluation |
Representative
samples of children & programs |
Report on overall program quality, child outcomes and impacts |
|
Monitoring |
Programs receiving public funds
|
Determine program compliance with quality standards
|
Assessments
for
Instruction |
All children |
Plan curriculum & inform
parents on children’s progress. |
|
|
Quality Rating
Systems |
Programs
seeking recognition for varied higher levels of quality
|
Determine programs achieving varying levels of quality |
Kg. Readiness
Assessments
Assessments
for state &
federal
agencies |
All children
Children enrolled in a specific program |
Report on children’s
Readiness levels
Report to funding sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEDERAL & STATE ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVES
|
|
State Pre-K |
Child Care |
Pre-K Special Education |
Head Start |
|
Program
Assessments |
Program Monitoring
30 states |
Licensing
50 states
Quality Rating Systems
12 states |
Program Monitoring
50 states |
Program Monitoring –
50 states
(Federal reviews) |
|
Child
Assessments |
Pre-K Assessments
12 states
Kg. Readiness Assessments
16 states |
|
Assessments
50 states
(Federal outcome areas) |
National Reporting System
50 states
(Federal assessment tool) |
|
Program
Evaluations |
Pre-K Program Evaluations
30+ states |
Child Care Policy Research Consortium |
Special Education Evaluations |
Head Start Evaluations |
KEY TRENDS
- Programs and children are being assessed; programs are being held accountable.
- All states, many providers and many teachers are managing multiple systems of program and child assessments.
- State and federal-mandated child assessments are increasing.
- More assessment data on young children and programs is being reported.
CONCERNS FROM EARLY CHILDHOOD EXPERTS AND PROVIDERS
Early childhood leaders support child and program assessments, high standards, and strong accountability.
They are concerned about the costs and burdens of multiple systems of program and child assessments.
They are concerned about the implications of increasing mandates for large-scale assessments of young children:
4 STEPS FOR STATE PRE-K ASSESSMENT/ACCOUNTABILITY
|
|
#1
Monitor Local Pre-K Program Quality |
#2
Evaluate State
Pre-K Program |
#3
Kg. Readiness Assessment |
#4
Quality Rating System |
|
Who Is Assessed?
|
All local pre-k providers/agencies |
Representative samples of local pre-k programs and enrolled children |
All children at entry to kg. |
Early childhood programs seeking recognition for varied levels of quality. |
|
Key Questions
|
- Do all programs met or exceed state quality standards?
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of individual programs?
- What are trends in program quality over time?
|
- What is the level of quality of a typical pre-k program?
- What are child outcomes, and progress of children’s learning during pre-k?
- What impacts are attributable to pre-k program participation?
- Do children from pre-k programs continue to progress in kg.? |
- What are the skill levels of all young children at school entry?
- How do outcomes compare across communities, schools and for sub-groups of children?
- Are there changes over time in patterns of outcomes? |
- What % of programs achieve different levels of quality?
- Do %s of programs achieving higher levels of quality increase over time?
- Are all communities served by programs with high levels of quality? |
|
Uses of Assessment Information
|
- Report to legislature on compliance of local programs with state standards.
- Guide technical assistance to remedy program deficiencies.
- Terminate funding for low-quality programs that are unable to remedy deficiencies.
|
- Report to legislature and public on program quality, outcomes, impacts.
- Identifies priorities for program improvement
- Legislature may consider in setting appropriation levels. |
- Report to legislature, public and schools on children’s skills at kg. entry.
- Planning to improve and guide investments in early childhood services.
- Planning kg. and primary grade programs. |
- Agencies publicize quality rating to parents and consumers.
- Programs attaining higher quality ratings may qualify for higher rates of funding.
|
LEADERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES FOR STATE LEGISLATORS
I. INVOLVE PROVIDERS, TEACHERS, PARENTS AND SCHOOLS
II. FOCUS ON WHAT QUESTIONS ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO ANSWER
III. SIMPLIFY AND INCREASE COHERENCE ACROSS FUNDING STREAMS
IV. DEVOTE EQUAL ATTENTION/RESOURCES TO
- PLANNING ASSESSMENT MANDATES
- USING ASSESSMENTS TO HELP PROGRAMS WORK BETTER
V. BALANCE ATTENTION ON:
- HOW WELL ALL YOUNG CHILDREN ARE DOING?
- HOW LOW-INCOME, MINORITY, AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS ARE PROGRESSING?
- ARE WE PROVIDING HIGH QUALITY LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES TO ALL CHILDREN?
VI. EXPLORE WAYS TO CONNECT PRE-K AND KG.-GRADE 3 ASSESSMENTS AND ACCOUNTABILITY
THE EARLY CHILDHOOD ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
The Project is designing accountability strategies to improve the quality, effectiveness and credibility of state-funded early education programs serving 3- and 4-year-old children. The need for new accountability models for state early childhood programs comes from the following trends and priorities:
- An increasing focus on reducing gaps in educational achievement.
- Growing accountability efforts in public education and other federal and state programs.
- Increasing state investment in pre-kindergarten and other early childhood programs.
- New state efforts to create early learning standards and manage large-scale assessments of young children.
A National Task Force of experts and state policy leaders will develop recommendations to guide state accountability planning, development and implementation efforts. The Task Force report, due to be completed by fall, 2006, will include guidance for states in adapting, augmenting and linking three aspects of early childhood policy and management systems:
- Setting Standards - States will be encouraged to review standards for early childhood programs, teachers and children to ensure that they are research-based, reflective of diversity of young children, and aligned appropriately with standards and assessments in use in kindergarten-grade 2 programs.
- Assessing Programs and Children – Based on the above standards, recommendations will include guidance on selecting measures and assessment tools, managing large-scale data collection efforts and analyzing new and existing data on:
-Conditions & characteristics of children and families. -Program quality, classroom environments and teaching practices. -Children’s progress & levels of accomplishment. -Levels of public investment and support for quality early childhood services.
- Reporting and Using Accountability Data – Recommendations will guide states in reporting child and program performance information to a variety of audiences:
-Reporting to local program leaders to help them improve curriculum, teaching, program services and linkages with kindergarten through grade 2 schooling. -Reporting to state program managers as they clarify and fine-tune standards, design technical assistance and professional development efforts and target program funding. -Reporting to state policymakers to contribute to their oversight and funding of early childhood programs. -Reporting to the public on trends in early childhood program outcomes, levels of state investment and conditions of young children.
The Project is supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Foundation for Child Development and the Joyce Foundation. For more information contact Tom Schultz, Project Director at tschultz@pewtrusts.org or 202-552-2136, or access the Project website at www.earlyedaccountability.org.
THE NATIONAL EARLY CHILDHOOD ACCOUNTABILITY TASK FORCE
| Dr. Sharon Lynn Kagan,
Chairperson Professor and Associate Dean for Policy Teachers College, Columbia University Professor Adjunct, Yale University New Haven, CT |
Dr. Lindy Buch Director, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan Department of Education Lansing, MI |
Dr. Joan Lombardi, Director, The Children’s Project Research Professor, Georgetown University Washington, D.C. |
Dr. Eugene Garcia, Vice-Chairperson
Vice President for University-School Partnerships Dean, College of Education Arizona State University Tempe, AZ |
Dr. Maryann Santos de Barona,
Professor and Interim Associate Dean College of Education Arizona State University Tempe, AZ |
Dr. Samuel Meisels President Erikson Institute Chicago, IL |
| Dr. W. Steven Barnett
Director, National Institute for Early Education Research Professor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick, N.J. |
Ms. Harriet Dichter
Deputy Secretary, Office of Child Development, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Policy Director, Pennsylvania Dept.of Education Harrisburg, PA |
Ms. Marsha Moore Commissioner Georgia Department of Early Care & Learning Atlanta, GA |
|
Ms. Barbara Bowman Professor Erikson Institute Chicago, IL |
Mr. Mark Friedman Executive Director The Fiscal Policy Studies Institute Santa Fe, N.M. |
Dr. Robert Pianta Professor University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA |
| Dr. Mary Beth Bruder
Professor of Pediatrics University of Connecticut Farmington, CT |
Dr. Jacqueline Jones Director, Early Childhood Research and DevelopmentEducational Testing Service Princeton, N.J. |
Dr. Donald Rock Senior Research Scientist Educational Testing Service Princeton, N.J. |
|