Skip to Page Content
Home  |  Contact Us  |  Press Room  |  Site Overview  |  Help  |  Login  |  Register
Add to MyNCSL

DESIGNING EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS

NCSL Prekindergarten Leadership Institute
Denver, COJune 4-6, 2006

Dr. Thomas Schultz – The Pew Charitable Trusts – tschultz@pewtrusts.org
Dr. Eugene Garcia,Arizona State University – eugene.garcia@asu.edu

SESSION OBJECTIVES

  • EXPLAIN CURRENT FORMS OF ASSESSMENTS OF YOUNG CHILDREN AND EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAMS

  • HIGHLIGHT CURRENT STATE AND FEDERAL MANDATES & SYSTEMS

  • SUMMARIZE KEY CONCERNS OF EARLY CHILDHOOD LEADERS ON  ACCOUNTABILITY AND ASSESSMENT ISSUES

  • OUTLINE 4 MODELS FOR STATE PRE-K PROGRAM ACCOUNTABILITY

  • ASK YOU 2 QUESTIONS TO HELP OUR NATIONAL TASK FORCE ON EARLY CHILDHOOD ACCOUNTABILITY

  • ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS

Kagan/Schultz

EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS AT-A-GLANCE

Program Assessments

Child Assessments

Child & Program Assessments

System

Who Is Assessed?

Purpose

System

Who Is Assessed?

Purpose

System

Who Is Assessed?

Purpose

Licensing

All programs serving young children

Determine compliance with health & safety standards

Developmental

Screening

All children

Referral for special education

assessment

Program

Evaluation

Representative

samples of children &  programs

Report on overall program quality, child outcomes and impacts

Monitoring

Programs receiving public funds

Determine  program compliance with quality standards

Assessments

for

Instruction

All children

Plan curriculum & inform

parents on children’s progress.

Quality Rating

Systems

Programs

seeking recognition for varied higher levels of quality

Determine programs achieving varying levels of quality

Kg. Readiness

Assessments

Assessments

for state &

federal

agencies

All children

Children enrolled in a specific program

Report on  children’s

Readiness levels

Report to      funding  sources

FEDERAL & STATE ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVES

State Pre-K

Child Care

Pre-K Special Education

Head Start

Program

Assessments

Program Monitoring

30 states

Licensing 

50 states

Quality Rating Systems

12 states

Program Monitoring

50 states

Program Monitoring

50 states

(Federal reviews)

Child

Assessments

Pre-K Assessments

12 states

Kg. Readiness Assessments

16 states

Assessments

50 states

(Federal outcome areas)

National Reporting System

50 states

(Federal assessment tool)

Program

Evaluations

Pre-K Program Evaluations

30+ states

Child Care Policy Research Consortium

Special Education Evaluations

Head Start Evaluations

KEY TRENDS

  • Programs and children are being assessed; programs are being held accountable.

  • All states, many providers and many teachers are managing multiple systems of program and child assessments.

  • State and federal-mandated child assessments are increasing.

  • More assessment data on young children and programs is being reported.

CONCERNS FROM EARLY CHILDHOOD EXPERTS AND PROVIDERS

Early childhood leaders support child and program assessments, high standards, and strong accountability.

They are concerned about the costs and burdens of multiple systems of program and child assessments.

They are concerned about the implications of increasing mandates for large-scale assessments of young children:

  • Are we assessing what’s important or assessing what is easy to test?

  •  Can we accurately assess young English language learners?

  • Will more child assessment mandates lead to “teaching to the test”?

  • Are we heading towards No Child Left Behind for early childhood – “high stakes” consequences for child assessment results?

  • If program funding is eventually linked to child outcomes, will programs respond by seeking to recruit fewer children from disadvantaged families?

4 STEPS FOR STATE PRE-K ASSESSMENT/ACCOUNTABILITY

#1

Monitor Local Pre-K Program Quality

#2

Evaluate State

Pre-K Program

#3

Kg. Readiness Assessment

#4

Quality Rating System

Who Is Assessed?

All local pre-k providers/agencies

Representative samples of local pre-k programs and enrolled children

All children at entry to kg.

Early childhood programs seeking recognition for varied levels of quality.

Key Questions

- Do all programs met or exceed state quality standards?

- What are the strengths and weaknesses of individual programs?

- What are trends in program quality over time?

- What is the level of quality of a typical pre-k program?

- What are child outcomes, and progress of children’s learning during pre-k?

- What impacts are attributable to pre-k program participation?

- Do children from pre-k programs continue to progress in kg.?

- What are the skill levels of all young children at school entry?

- How do outcomes compare across communities, schools and for sub-groups of children?

- Are there changes over time in patterns of outcomes?

- What % of programs achieve different levels of quality?

- Do %s of programs achieving higher levels of quality increase over time?

- Are all communities served by programs with high levels of quality?

Uses of Assessment Information

- Report to legislature on  compliance of local programs with state standards.

- Guide technical assistance to remedy program deficiencies.

- Terminate funding for low-quality programs that are unable to remedy deficiencies.

- Report to legislature and public on program quality, outcomes, impacts.

- Identifies priorities for program improvement

- Legislature may consider in setting appropriation levels.

- Report to legislature, public and schools on children’s skills at kg. entry.

- Planning to improve and guide investments in early childhood services.

- Planning  kg. and primary grade programs.

- Agencies publicize quality rating to parents and consumers.

- Programs attaining higher quality ratings may qualify for higher rates of funding.

LEADERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES FOR STATE LEGISLATORS

I.                INVOLVE PROVIDERS, TEACHERS, PARENTS AND SCHOOLS

II.            FOCUS ON WHAT QUESTIONS ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO ANSWER

III.       SIMPLIFY AND INCREASE COHERENCE ACROSS FUNDING STREAMS

IV.           DEVOTE EQUAL ATTENTION/RESOURCES TO

  • PLANNING ASSESSMENT MANDATES
  • USING ASSESSMENTS TO HELP PROGRAMS WORK BETTER

V.               BALANCE ATTENTION ON:

  • HOW WELL ALL YOUNG CHILDREN ARE DOING?  
  • HOW LOW-INCOME, MINORITY, AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS ARE PROGRESSING?
  • ARE WE PROVIDING HIGH QUALITY LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES TO ALL CHILDREN?

VI.           EXPLORE WAYS TO CONNECT PRE-K AND KG.-GRADE 3 ASSESSMENTS AND ACCOUNTABILITY

THE EARLY CHILDHOOD ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT

The Project is designing accountability strategies to improve the quality, effectiveness and credibility of state-funded early education programs serving 3- and 4-year-old children. The need for new accountability models for state early childhood programs comes from the following trends and priorities:

  • An increasing focus on reducing gaps in educational achievement.
  • Growing accountability efforts in public education and other federal and state programs.
  • Increasing state investment in pre-kindergarten and other early childhood programs.
  • New state efforts to create early learning standards and manage large-scale assessments of young children.

A National Task Force of experts and state policy leaders will develop recommendations to guide state accountability planning, development and implementation efforts.  The Task Force report, due to be completed by fall, 2006, will include guidance for states in adapting, augmenting and linking three aspects of early childhood policy and management systems:

  • Setting Standards -  States will be encouraged to review standards for early childhood programs, teachers and children to ensure that they are research-based, reflective of diversity of young children, and aligned appropriately with standards and assessments in use in kindergarten-grade 2 programs.

  • Assessing Programs and Children – Based on the above standards, recommendations will include guidance on selecting measures and assessment tools, managing large-scale data collection efforts and analyzing new and existing data on:

          -Conditions & characteristics of children and families.
          -Program quality, classroom environments and teaching practices.
          -Children’s progress & levels of accomplishment.
          -Levels of public investment and support for quality early childhood services.

  • Reporting and Using Accountability Data – Recommendations will guide states in reporting child and program performance information to a variety of audiences:

         -Reporting to local program leaders to help them improve curriculum, teaching, program services and linkages with kindergarten through grade 2 schooling.
         -Reporting to state program managers as they clarify and fine-tune standards, design technical assistance and professional development efforts and target program 
          funding. 
         -Reporting to state policymakers to contribute to their oversight and funding of early childhood programs.
         -Reporting to the public on trends in early childhood program outcomes, levels of state investment and conditions of young children.

The Project is supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Foundation for Child Development and the Joyce Foundation.  For more information contact Tom Schultz, Project Director at tschultz@pewtrusts.org or 202-552-2136, or access the Project website at www.earlyedaccountability.org.

THE NATIONAL EARLY CHILDHOOD ACCOUNTABILITY TASK FORCE

Dr. Sharon Lynn Kagan,

Chairperson
Professor and Associate Dean for Policy
Teachers College, Columbia University
Professor Adjunct, Yale University
New Haven, CT

Dr. Lindy Buch
Director, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services
Michigan Department of Education
Lansing, MI

Dr. Joan Lombardi,
Director, The Children’s Project
Research Professor, Georgetown University
Washington, D.C.

Dr. Eugene Garcia
Vice-Chairperson

Vice President for University-School Partnerships
Dean, College of Education
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ

Dr. Maryann Santos de Barona,

Professor and Interim Associate Dean
College of Education
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ

Dr. Samuel Meisels
President
Erikson Institute
Chicago, IL

Dr. W. Steven Barnett

Director, National Institute for Early Education Research Professor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
New Brunswick, N.J.

Ms. Harriet Dichter

Deputy Secretary, Office of Child Development,
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
Policy Director, Pennsylvania Dept.of Education Harrisburg, PA

Ms. Marsha Moore
Commissioner
Georgia Department of Early Care & Learning
Atlanta, GA

Ms. Barbara Bowman
Professor
Erikson Institute
Chicago, IL

Mr. Mark Friedman
Executive Director
The Fiscal Policy Studies Institute
Santa Fe, N.M.

Dr. Robert Pianta
Professor
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA

 Dr. Mary Beth Bruder

Professor of Pediatrics
University of Connecticut
Farmington, CT

Dr. Jacqueline Jones
Director, Early Childhood Research and DevelopmentEducational Testing Service
Princeton, N.J.

Dr. Donald Rock
Senior Research Scientist
Educational Testing Service
Princeton, N.J.

 

Denver Office: Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230 | Map
Washington Office: Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001