|
State |
Low Income Guideline |
|
Alabama |
The court may use its discretion in determining child support in
circumstances where combined adjusted gross income is below the lowermost
levels of the schedule. |
|
Alaska |
In cases where the obligor parent's income is below poverty level as
set forth in the Federal Register, $9,870 in 1997, the court may deviate,
but may not order support less than $50 per month. |
|
Arizona |
Child support awards based upon income of less than $650 per month
shall be based on the facts of the individual case and shall be consistent
with the theory of the guidelines and the factors set forth in A.R.S. ยง
25-320. |
|
Arkansas |
No provision for low income. |
|
California |
In cases where the net disposable income of the obligor is less than
$1,000 per month, the court shall rule on whether a low-income adjustment
shall be made. |
|
Colorado |
The judge may use his judicial discretion in determining child support
in circumstances where a parent is living below subsistence level, except
that a minimum child support payment of $20 to $50 per month shall be
required. |
|
Connecticut |
Income below the basic guideline schedule is a deviation
factor. |
|
Delaware |
Legal presumption that no child support order be less than $65 per
month. |
|
District of Columbia |
Where the noncustodial parent earns less than $7,500 per year, the
amount of support ordered is in the court's discretion, but shall in no
event be less than $50 per month. |
|
Florida |
For combined monthly available income less than the amount in the basic
guideline schedule, the court shall determine support on a case-by-case
basis. |
|
Georgia |
Low income is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Hawaii |
A total monthly child support obligation greater than 70% of the
support obligor's available income for primary support is an exceptional
circumstance warranting deviation. |
|
Idaho |
There is a rebuttable presumption that in cases of low income, a
minimum amount of support should be at least $50 per month. |
|
Illinois |
Low income is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Indiana |
For obligors with combined weekly adjusted income of less than $100,
the court shall determine support on a case-by-case basis, with support in
a range of $25 to $50 per week. A specific amount of child support should
always be ordered. |
|
Iowa |
Where the noncustodial parent's income is less than $500 per month,
appropriate support shall be $50 per month for one or two children, $75
per month for three or more children. |
|
Kansas |
For combined gross monthly income below the poverty level, a chart is
provided, with a $7 minimum for one child. |
|
Kentucky |
Low income is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Louisiana |
If the combined adjusted gross income of the parties is less than the
lowest sum shown on the schedule, the court shall determine an amount of
support based on the facts of the case. |
|
Maine |
If the annual gross income of a nonprimary care provider is less than
poverty level, support shall not be more than 10% of that parent's weekly
gross income. |
|
Maryland |
Where combined adjusted income is less than $500 per month, support
shall be $20 to $50, based on resources of the parent. |
|
Massachusetts |
Where the noncustodial parent's income is less than $125 per week,
support shall be $50. |
|
Michigan |
Where the noncustodial parent earns $149 or less per week, he or she
will pay 10% of income for support. |
|
Minnesota |
Where the net income of the obligor is less than $550 per month, the
order shall be based on the ability of the obligor to provide
support. |
|
Mississippi |
In cases where the adjusted gross income is less than $5,000, the court
shall make a written finding in the record as to whether or not the
application of the guidelines established in this section is
reasonable. |
|
Missouri |
No direct statutory provision. Case law, however, provides that the
court may deviate upon good cause. |
|
Montana |
A minimum support obligation is calculated by a special
formula. |
|
Nebraska |
It is recommended that even in very low income cases, a minimum support
of $50 be set. |
|
Nevada |
Notwithstanding the formulas provided, the minimum support order shall
be $100 per month per child, unless the court makes written findings for a
deviation. |
|
New Hampshire |
The court shall order a minimum support order of $50 per month in cases
of low income. Significantly high or low income of the parents is a
deviation factor. |
|
New Jersey |
The guidelines do not apply to persons whose net income is $160 per
week, but the court must order at least $5 per week. |
|
New Mexico |
For gross monthly income less than $600, the court shall determine
support on a case-by-case basis, with a minimum support order of $100.
Where, however, the support order is more than 40% of gross income, there
is a presumption in favor of deviation. |
|
New York |
Where the amount of support awarded would reduce the noncustodial
parent's income below the poverty level, support shall be $25 or $50,
depending on the self-support reserve and poverty level. |
|
North Carolina |
For obligors with an adjusted gross income of less than $700, the
guidelines require the establishment, absent a reason for deviation, of a
minimum order of $50. |
|
North Dakota |
Where the obligor's net monthly income is $100 or less, the court shall
establish a minimum support obligation on a case-by-case basis. |
|
Ohio |
Where combined gross income is less than $6,600 per year, support is
determined on a case-by-case basis. |
|
Oklahoma |
For combined gross monthly income under $650, the presumptive minimum
support award is $50 per month. |
|
Oregon |
There shall be a rebuttable presumption that the noncustodial parent
has the ability to pay at least $50 per month as child support. |
|
Pennsylvania |
When the obligor's net income is below $750 per month, a minimal
support order shall be entered on consideration of the obligor's
reasonable living expenses. |
|
Rhode Island |
For obligors with a combined adjusted gross income of less than $500
per month, support is determined on a case-by-case basis, with support
ranging from $20 to $50 per month. |
|
South Carolina |
In cases where the parents' combined monthly gross income is less than
$500 per month, the support shall be determined on a case-by-case basis,
with a minimum order of $50 per month. |
|
South Dakota |
A minimum obligation of $43 is established on the chart, but the court
may deviate due to the financial condition of the parties. |
|
Tennessee |
No provision for low income. |
|
Texas |
The ability of parents to contribute to support of the child, and
financial resources available for the support of the child, are listed as
deviation factors. |
|
Utah |
If the monthly adjusted gross income of the obligor is $649 or less,
support shall be calculated on a case-by-case basis, but the support award
shall not be less than $20. |
|
Vermont |
If the noncustodial parent's income is less than the lowest income
figure or less than the self-support reserve, the court shall use its
discretion in determining support, and shall require support in a nominal
amount. |
|
Virginia |
Financial resources and needs of the parents is listed as a deviation
factor. |
|
Washington |
For income less than $600 per month, the obligation is based on the
resources and living expenses of each household. Minimum support shall not
be less than $25 per child per month, except when permitted by
statute. |
|
West Virginia |
The guidelines do not apply to combined adjusted gross monthly income
under $550. In the case of combined income under $550, the support
obligation shall be $50 per month or an amount determined by the court.
Low income is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Wisconsin |
Low income is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Wyoming |
Where the combined income of the parents is less than $732 per month,
the support obligation of the noncustodial parent is 25% of net income,
but in no event shall the support obligation be less than $50 per
month. |
|
Source: Morgan, Laura W., Child Support Guidelines, 1999
Supplement, Aspen Law & Business, New York,
1999. |