|
State |
High Income Guideline |
|
Alabama |
The court may use its discretion in determining child
support in circumstances where combined adjusted gross income is below the
lowermost levels or exceeds the uppermost levels of the
schedule. |
|
Alaska |
In cases where the obligor parent's income is greater than
$84,000 per year, the court should use the $84,000 as the parent's income,
and increase the support above the amount calculated using the $72,000 per
year figure only if it is just and proper. |
|
Arizona |
Combined incomes of over $20,000 a month shall have orders
set according to guidelines. If a party wants an greater than the
presumptive amount, the party must establish with the court that a greater
amount would be in the child's best interests. Lists factors that could
determine a child's best interest. |
|
Arkansas |
When the payor's income exceeds that shown on the chart,
the trial court shall disregard the chart and apply different
percentages. |
|
California |
Where the parent being ordered to pay child support has an
extraordinarily high income and the amount determined under the formula
would exceed the needs of the children, the court may deviate from the
formula provided. The high value of residence of children is also listed
as a deviation factor. |
|
Colorado |
The judge may use his judicial discretion in cases where combined
adjusted gross income exceeds the uppermost levels of the guideline,
except that the presumptive basic child support obligation shall not be
less than it would be based on the highest level of adjusted gross income
set forth in the guideline. |
|
Connecticut |
Above $2,500 weekly income, awards shall be determined on
a case by case basis, provided the amount of support prescribed at the
$2,500 level is presumed to be the minimum order. |
|
Delaware |
In cases of high income, a basic amount plus a particular
percentage shall be applied. |
|
District of Columbia |
The guideline percentage shall not apply to a noncustodial
parent with income that exceeds $75,000. The amount available to a child
in such a case shall not be less than the amount that would have been
ordered if the guideline had been applied to a noncustodial parent with
income of $75,000. |
|
Florida |
For combined monthly available income greater than the
amount in the chart, the obligation shall be the minimum amount of support
provided by the guidelines, plus a percentage based on the number of
children whose support is being determined. |
|
Georgia |
High income, defined as individual gross income over
$75,000 a year, is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Hawaii |
A monthly income that would result in a computation higher
than the reasonable needs of the children is an exceptional circumstance
warranting deviation. |
|
Idaho |
The guideline income schedules are not a limitation on the
award of support for combined incomes over $150,000. In cases where
combined income exceeds $150,000 per year, the court shall award support
on a case-by-case basis, using "all relevant factors." Details what type
of factors could be considered. |
|
Illinois |
High income is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Indiana |
For combined weekly adjusted income of $4,000, a special
formula is applied as a presumptive amount. |
|
Iowa |
Where the noncustodial parent's income is $6,001 per month
or higher, support is determined on a case-by-case basis, but not less
than the dollar amount as provided for in the guidelines for a
noncustodial parent with a monthly net income of $6,000. |
|
Kansas |
If the combined income exceeds the highest amount shown on
the schedules, the court should exercise its discretion by considering
what amount of child support should be set in addition to the highest
amount on the schedule. A suggested formula is provided. |
|
Kentucky |
High income is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Louisiana |
If the combined adjusted monthly gross income of the
parties exceeds the highest level specified in the schedule, the court
shall use its discretion in setting the amount of the basic obligation in
accordance with the best interest of the child and the circumstances of
each parent. |
|
Maine |
When the combined annual gross income exceeds $240,000 the
child support table is inapplicable except that the basic weekly support
entitlement shall not be less than that set forth in the table for a
combined annual gross income of $240,000. |
|
Maryland |
If the combined income exceeds the highest level in the
chart, the court may use its discretion in setting the amount of support.
|
|
Massachusetts |
Where the combined gross income of the parties exceeds
$135,000, or where the gross income of the noncustodial parent exceeds
$100,000, the court should award support at the $135,000/$100,000 level as
a minimum presumptive amount. Additional support may be awarded at court's
discretion. |
|
Michigan |
In high-income cases, where total family income exceeds
the income categories provided, support is calculated by the application
of certain percentages. |
|
Minnesota |
Guidelines stipulate that an obligor with a monthly income
in excess of the income limit provided in the chart shall pay the same
dollar amount as provided in the guidelines for an obligor with a monthly
income equal to the limit in effect. All earnings, income, and resources
of parents is listed as a deviation factor. |
|
Mississippi |
In cases where the adjusted gross income is more than
$50,000 or less than $5,000, the court shall make a written finding in the
record as to whether or not the application of the guidelines established
in this section is reasonable. |
|
Missouri |
Court should consider whether or not combined adjusted
monthly gross income exceeds $15,000 per month when determining whether to
deviate from guidelines. |
|
Montana |
There is no special provision for high income. |
|
Nebraska |
If total net income exceeds $10,000 monthly, child support
for amounts in excess of $10,000 monthly may be more but shall not be less
than the amount that would be computed using the $10,000 monthly income
unless other permissible deviations exist. |
|
Nevada |
If a parent's gross monthly income is equal to or greater
than $14,583 (highest amount listed in the guidelines), the maximum amount
a parent may be required to pay is $800. |
|
New Hampshire |
Significantly high or low income of the parents is a
deviation factor. |
|
New Jersey |
For parents with a combined income of $150,800, the court
shall apply the guidelines up to that amount, and supplement the award
with a discretionary amount based on the remaining family income.
Extrapolation is expressly forbidden. |
|
New Mexico |
For gross monthly income greater than $8,300, certain
percentages shall be applied depending on the number of
children. |
|
New York |
Where combined parental income exceeds the dollar amount
set forth in the guidelines, the court shall determine the amount of
support for the amount of the combined income in excess of such dollar
amount by consideration of the factors set forth in the deviation
paragraph and/or the support percentage. |
|
North Carolina |
Where combined parental income is above $180,000, child
support is determined on a case-by-case basis, provided that the amount of
support awarded may not be lower than the maximum basic child support
obligation shown in the schedule. |
|
North Dakota |
The chart provides support in cases of net monthly income
over $10,000. High income is a deviation factor. |
|
Ohio |
If the combined gross income of both parents is greater
than $150,000 per year, the court shall determine support on a
case-by-case basis, provided that the court shall compute a basic combined
obligation that is no less than the same percentage of the parents'
combined income that would have been computed under the schedule for a
combined income of $150,000. |
|
Oklahoma |
In the event monthly income exceeds $15,000, the child
support shall be that amount computed for a monthly income of $15,000 plus
such additional amount as the court may determine. |
|
Oregon |
For combined adjusted gross income exceeding $15,000 per
month, the presumed basic support obligations shall be as for parents with
combined adjusted gross income of $15,000. A basic child support
obligation in excess of this level may be demonstrated for those reasons
set forth in the deviation criteria section. |
|
Pennsylvania |
When the parties' combined net income exceeds $15,000 per month, child
support shall be calculated pursuant to Melzer v. Witsberger, 505
Pa. 462, 480 A.2d 991 (1984). The presumptive minimum amount of child
support shall be obligor's percentage share of the highest amount of
support which can be derived from the schedule for the appropriate number
of children and using the parties' actual combined income to determine
obligor's percentage share of this amount. The court may award an
additional amount of child support based on the parties' combined income
and the factors set forth in Melzer. In a Melzer analysis
case, the presumptive minimum remains applicable. |
|
Rhode Island |
For cases with a higher combined monthly adjusted gross
income level than $15,000 per month, child support shall be considered on
a case-by-case basis. |
|
South Carolina |
Where the combined gross income is greater than $180,000
per year, courts should determine child support on a case-by-case
basis. |
|
South Dakota |
For a combined net income above the schedule, the child
support obligation shall be established at an appropriate level, taking
into account the actual needs and standard of living of the
child. |
|
Tennessee |
In cases where the obligor's income exceeds $10,000 per
month, the custodial parent must prove that child support above what
guidelines require is necessary to provide for a child's needs. In such a
case, the court may deviate. Requires court to consider all of an
obligor's available income. |
|
Texas |
In situations where the obligor's net resources exceed
$6,000 per month, the court shall presumptively apply the percentage
guidelines to the first $6,000, and may order additional support. In no
event may the obligor be required to pay more than an amount equal to 100%
of the proven needs of the child. |
|
Utah |
If the combined adjusted gross income exceeds the highest
level specified in the table, an appropriate and just support amount shall
be ordered on a case-by-case basis, but the amount ordered may not be less
than the highest level specified in the table for the number of children
due support. |
|
Vermont |
The court may use its discretion in determining child
support in circumstances where combined available income exceeds the
uppermost levels of support adopted in the guideline. |
|
Virginia |
Where combined gross monthly exceeds $10,000 per month, a
special formula shall apply to the amount over $10,000 per month.
|
|
Washington |
When combined net income exceeds $7,000, the court may set
support at an advisory amount of support set for combined monthly net
incomes between $5,000 and $7,000 or the court may exceed the advisory
amount of support set for combined monthly net incomes of $7,000 upon
written findings of fact. |
|
West Virginia |
In the case of combined income over $15,000, the support
award shall not be less than that provided at the $15,000 per month level,
plus an amount determined by a formula applied to the excess over
$15,000. |
|
Wisconsin |
The court may deviate from the presumptive award if it
finds on the record that the order is unfair to the child or the
party. |
|
Wyoming |
Where the combined income of the parents is greater than
$5,885, a special formula applies. |
|
Source: Morgan, Laura W., Child Support Guidelines, 1998
Supplement, Aspen Law & Business, New York, 1998, and 2003
update. |