|
Alaska
|
HB 162*
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
Colorado
|
HB12-1111
|
The state will have one-time costs of $13,500 to revise, print, and distribute new voter registration forms and other election-related materials.
|
The bill will increase the workload of county clerks. The offices of county clerks will be required to update county publications and procedures to conform with the new requirements.
|
|
Delaware
|
HB 199*
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
Florida
|
HB 4129*
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
Hawaii
|
HB 2221
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
Illinois
|
HB 3058*, HB 3903*, HB 5213, HB 5462, SB 2035*, SB 2496*,
SB 3750
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
Iowa
|
HF 95*
|
The fiscal impact of HF 95 cannot be determined as the number of persons required to purchase nonoperator identification cards cannot precisely be determined. However, the fiscal impact is not expected to be significant as most registered voters have driver licenses and persons without photo identification will continue to have the option to vote via mail-in absentee ballot.
|
|
SF 142*
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
Kentucky
|
HB 520
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
Maine
|
LD 199
|
An annual general fund cost of $256,000 to manufacture additional identification cards. There would also be a reduction in highway fund revenue of $69,000 per year to eliminate the fees currently collected on identification cards.
|
|
|
Maryland
|
HB 113
|
For FY 2013, costs may total at least $500,000; however, the local boards of elections are expected to be responsible for a portion of the cost. General fund expenditures may also increase in FY 2013 and future years to the extent additional provisional ballots are determined to be needed. Voter outreach costs are expected to diminish in future years.
|
Local government expenditures may increase due to costs associated with voter outreach, additional election judges, additional provisional ballots, and mailing of voter notification cards.
|
|
HB 705
|
General fund expenditures may increase by at least $830,800 in FY 2013, accounting for quantifiable costs of including physical identification information in electronic poll books and voter education. Implementation of the bill is expected to be a significant initiative and the total extent of the associated costs is uncertain at this time. It is assumed these costs, the allocation of which is also uncertain, are split between the State and counties. Voter education costs are expected to continue, but eventually diminish, in future years.
|
Local government expenditures also may increase by at least $830,800 in FY 2013 due to costs associated with upgrading electronic poll books and voter education. Local government expenditures may also increase due to training and compensation of election judges, additional provisional ballots and canvassing costs, costs to send out replacement voter notification cards, and possibly costs for additional electronic poll books.
|
|
Maryland, continued
|
SB 412
|
General fund expenditures are expected to increase significantly in FY 2013 to conduct voter outreach. Costs may total at least $500,000; however, the local boards of elections are expected to be responsible for a portion of the cost. General fund expenditures may also increase in FY 2013 and future years to the extent additional provisional ballots are determined to be needed. Voter outreach costs are expected to diminish in future years. The bill’s criminal penalty provisions are not expected to materially affect State finances.
|
Local government expenditures may increase due to costs associated with voter outreach, additional election judges, and additional provisional ballots. The bill’s criminal penalty provisions are not expected to materially affect local government finances.
|
|
Missouri
|
HB 1104
|
For FY 2013 the estimated cost is $0 or unknown (Unknown greater than $7,027,921); for FY 2014 the estimated cost is $0 or unknown (Unknown greater than $3,649,437); and for FY 2015 $0 or unknown (unknown greater than $6,267,554)
|
|
|
Nebraska
|
LB 239*
|
The Secretary of State estimates no fiscal impact.
|
|
|
LB 605*
|
No fiscal impact.
|
|
|
New Hampshire
|
HB 356
|
The Department of State states this bill will increase state restricted expenditures by an indeterminable amount in FY 2012 and each fiscal year thereafter. The Department of Safety states this bill will increase state highway fund expenditures by $9,250 in FY 2012. There will be no fiscal impact on state revenues.
|
There will be no fiscal impact on county and local revenues or expenditures.
|
|
SB 289
|
The Department of State, Department of Safety, Department of Justice, Judicial Branch, Judicial Council, and New Hampshire Municipal Association state this bill will have an indeterminable impact on state revenues, and state and local expenditures in FY 2013 and each year thereafter. New Hampshire Association of Counties states this bill will have an indeterminable impact on county expenditures in FY 2013 and each year thereafter. There will be no impact on county and local revenues.
|
|
SB 318
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
New Jersey
|
AB 674
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
SB 200
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
New Mexico
|
HB 113
|
FY 2012--$176,901
FY 2013--$412,770
FY 2014 and thereafter-- $58,967
|
|
|
Ohio
|
HB 159*
|
Potentially the initial cost could be over $570,000.
|
No direct fiscal effect on political subdivisions.
|
|
Oklahoma
|
HB 2821
|
Fiscal Note Not Available
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
HB 934
|
This legislation would have an estimated fiscal impact of $1,026,654 on the General Fund in the next 12-month period. The Governor’s proposed 2012-13 budget appropriates $1 million for photo ID for non-voting purposes.
|
|
|
Virginia
|
HB 9*
|
No fiscal impact.
|
|
|
West Virginia
|
HB 4387
|
$785,232
|
|
|
SB 532
|
$1,291,719
|
|
|
Key: *= Legislation carried over from 2011.
Source: State legislative websites and Debate over photo ID at the polls shifts to costs, Electionline Weekly. March 17, 2011
|