|
|
|
|
|
Early Care and Education State
Budget Actions FY 2011
|
| |
|
|
| Increase |
Decrease |
No Data Released |
Click on a state for specific changes to child care, prekindergarten, home visiting and other early childhood that occurred from FY 2010 to FY 2011. The map is based on survey information gathered for the Early Care and Education State Budget Action FY 2011 report. Please see chart below if the map is not viewable.
Early Care and Education State Budget Actions FY 2011 report is based on data compiled from an annual survey of state fiscal decisions in early care and education policy and programs, including child care, prekindergarten, home visiting and other related early childhood programs. The report tracks and analyzes trends in state decisions, particularly aiming to capture state funding choices in these areas. According to survey findings, funding for early care and education across the four areas surveyed remained stable with a slight increase. Click here to download highlights from the survey data findings.
In addition, 50-state profiles of data from FY 2008 to FY 2011 are available. Specific state and category information for Alabama through Hawaii can be found here, Idaho through Minnesota can be found here, Mississippi through Oregon can be found here and Pennsylvania through U.S. Virgin Islands can be found here.
Source: NCSL Early Care and Education State Budget Survey FY 2011.
|
| State |
CHILD CARE |
PREKINDERGARTEN |
HOME VISITING |
OTHER EARLY CHILDHOOD |
OVERALL DIFFERENCE
FY 2010 - FY 2011
|
| Alabama |
FY 2010: $108,004,335
FY 2011: $109,126,854
% Difference: 1%
|
FY 2010: $17,070,209
FY 2011: $18,376,806
% Difference: 7.7%
|
FY 2010: $1,375,511
FY 2011: $1,405,909
% Difference: 2.2%
|
Information not provided.
|
1.9% Difference
|
| Alaska |
FY 2010: $32,694,805
FY 2011: $28,659,574
% Difference: -12.3%
|
FY 2010: $2,000,000
FY 2011: $2,000,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $2,963,415
FY 2011: $3,712,988
% Difference: 25.3%
|
FY 2010: $7,997,291
FY 2011: $8,820,800
% Difference: 10.3%
|
-5.4% Difference |
| Arizona |
FY 2010: $109,930,600
FY 2011: $148,489,000
% Difference: 35.1%
|
FY 2010: $6,515,600
FY 2011: $0
% Difference: -100%
|
FY 2010: $24,371,000
FY 2011: $27,318,000
% Difference: 12.1%
|
FY 2010: $86,423,200
FY 2011: $210,071,000
% Difference: 143.1%
|
69.8% Difference |
| Arkansas |
FY 2010: $77,694,926
FY 2011: $60,603,991
% Difference: -22%
|
FY 2010: $110,719,797
FY 2011: $111,000,000
% Difference: 0.3%
|
FY 2010: $10,234,784
FY 2011: $10,392,000
% Difference: 1.5%
|
Information not provided. |
-8.4% Difference
|
| California |
FY 2010: $2,670,000,000
FY 2011: $2,240,000,000
% Difference: -16.1%
|
FY 2010: $440,000,000
FY 2011: $380,000,000
% Difference: -13.6%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $490,000,000
FY 2011: $480,000,000
% Difference: -2%
|
-13.9% Difference |
| Colorado |
FY 2010: $114,775,882
FY 2011: $90,062,264
% Difference: -21.5%
|
FY 2010: $73,270,335
FY 2011: $70,701,717
% Difference: -3.5%
|
FY 2010: $12,865,409
FY 2011: $15,298,323
% Difference: 18.9%
|
Information not provided. |
-12.4% Difference |
| Connecticut |
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $68,085,158
FY 2011: $70,029,213
% Difference: 2.9%
|
FY 2010: $14,891,459
FY 2011: $14,890,566
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $52,908,967
FY 2011: $53,910,842
% Difference: 1.9%
|
2.2% Difference |
| Delaware |
FY 2010: $53,400,000
FY 2011: $47,600,000
% Difference: -10.9%
|
FY 2010: $5,727,800
FY 2011: $5,727,800
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $1,121,600
FY 2011: $1,121,600
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $5,711,856
FY 2011: $5,711,856
% Difference: 0%
|
-8.8% Difference |
| Florida |
FY 2010: $667,447,576
FY 2011: $683,094,413
% Difference: 2.3%
|
FY 2010: $392,219,840
FY 2011: $404,756,806
% Difference: 3.2%
|
FY 2010: $1,396,575
FY 2011: $1,400,000
% Difference: 0.2%
|
FY 2010: $29,308,242
FY 2011: $30,209,226
% Difference: 3.1%
|
2.7% Difference |
| Georgia |
FY 2010: $280,686,251
FY 2011: $251,086,251
% Difference: -10.5%
|
FY 2010: $341,715,959
FY 2011: $355,016,656
% Difference: 3.9%
|
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
-2.6% Difference |
| Hawaii |
FY 2010: $63,867,451
FY 2011: $52,455,005
% Difference: -17.9%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $1,320,000
FY 2011: $0
% Difference: -100%
|
FY 2010: $2,459,769
FY 2011: $1,293,583
% Difference: -47.4%
|
-20.5% Difference |
| Idaho |
FY 2010: $23,532,100
FY 2011: $27,182,900
% Difference: 15.5%
|
FY 2010: $8,143,240
FY 2011: $8,140,704
% Difference: 0%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $1,500,000
FY 2011: $1,500,000
% Difference: 0%
|
11% Difference |
| Illinois |
FY 2010: $775,869,758
FY 2011: $740,692,135
% Difference: -4.5%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $24,296,133
FY 2011: $24,621,500
% Difference: 1.3%
|
Information not provided. |
-4.4% Difference |
| Indiana |
FY 2010: $188,615,984
FY 2011: $172,524,179
% Difference: -8.5%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $38,447,766
FY 2011: $41,183,358
% Difference: 7.1%
|
FY 2010: $33,849
FY 2011: $67,648
% Difference: 99.9%
|
-5.9% Difference |
| Iowa |
FY 2010: $116,098,475
FY 2011: $117,835,162
% Difference: 1.5%
|
FY 2010: $50,600,000
FY 2011: $71,500,000
% Difference: 41.3%
|
FY 2010: $791,559
FY 2011: $738,203
% Difference: -6.7%
|
FY 2010: $29,195,153
FY 2011: $26,467,472
% Difference: -9.3%
|
10.1% Difference |
| Kansas |
FY 2010: $100,618,691
FY 2011: $104,179,169
% Difference: 3.5%
|
FY 2010: $5,824,380
FY 2011: $6,257,726
% Difference: 7.4%
|
FY 2010: $31,100,472
FY 2011: $33,081,227
% Difference: 6.4%
|
FY 2010: $11,750,786
FY 2011: $11,750,787
% Difference: 0%
|
4% Difference |
| Kentucky |
FY 2010: $156,831,548
FY 2011: $166,733,800
% Difference: 6.3%
|
FY 2010: $75,000,000
FY 2011: $72,500,000
% Difference: -3.3%
|
FY 2010: $28,225,723
FY 2011: $28,237,705
% Difference: 0%
|
Information not provided. |
2.9% Difference |
| Louisiana |
FY 2010: $148,422,671
FY 2011: $169,481,060
% Difference: 14.2%
|
FY 2010: $126,461,442
FY 2011: $177,050,000
% Difference: 40%
|
FY 2010: $13,867,718
FY 2011: $15,418,129
% Difference: 11.2%
|
FY 2010: $5,382,628
FY 2011: $5,585,710
% Difference: 3.8%
|
25% Difference |
| Maine |
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $13,826,444
FY 2011: $18,449,048
% Difference: 33.4%
|
FY 2010: $9,975,393
FY 2011: $9,707,530
% Difference: -2.7%
|
Information not provided. |
18.3% Difference |
| Maryland |
FY 2010: $103,401,499
FY 2011: $93,714,605
% Difference: -9.4%
|
FY 2010: $107,619,200
FY 2011: $109,600,000
% Difference: 1.8%
|
FY 2010: $4,590,343
FY 2011: $4,590,343
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $22,764,104
FY 2011: $22,764,104
% Difference: 0%
|
-3.2% Difference |
| Massachusetts |
FY 2010: $389,000,000
FY 2011: $560,000,000
% Difference: 44%
|
FY 2010: $8,000,000
FY 2011: $8,000,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $39,463,142
FY 2011: $42,548,390
% Difference: 7.8%
|
FY 2010: $9,000,000
FY 2011: $8,750,000
% Difference: -2.8%
|
39% Difference
|
| Michigan |
FY 2010: $224,920,385
FY 2011: $182,113,300
% Difference: -19%
|
FY 2010: $96,275,000
FY 2011: $98,875,000
% Difference: 2.7%
|
FY 2010: $17,538,889
FY 2011: $23,676,000
% Difference: 35%
|
FY 2010: $22,982,655
FY 2011: $46,934,200
% Difference: 104.2%
|
-2.8% Difference |
| Minnesota |
FY 2010: $205,952,000
FY 2011: $234,236,000
% Difference: 13.7%
|
FY 2010: $8,373,000
FY 2011: $9,792,000
% Difference: 16.9%
|
FY 2010: $550,000
FY 2011: $550,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $42,050,000
FY 2011: $45,105,000
% Difference: 7.3%
|
12.8% Difference |
| Mississippi |
FY 2010: $106,395,228
FY 2011: $86,361,234
% Difference: -18.8
|
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $626,965
FY 2011: $1,248,645
% Difference: 99.2%
|
-18.1% Difference |
| Missouri |
FY 2010: $259,572,754
FY 2011: $289,850,856
% Difference: 11.7%
|
FY 2010: $14,314,039
FY 2011: $14,757,600
% Difference: 3.1%
|
FY 2010: $23,918,098
FY 2011: $13,000,000
% Difference: -45.6%
|
Information not provided. |
6.6% Difference |
| Montana |
FY 2010: $18,820,516
FY 2011: $17,586,143
% Difference: -6.6%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $750,000
FY 2011: $750,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $2,361,805
FY 2011: $2,368,801
% Difference: 0.3%
|
-5.6% Difference |
| Nebraska |
FY 2010: $85,314,367
FY 2011: $86,167,511
% Difference: 1%
|
FY 2010: $3,204,686
FY 2011: $3,365,962
% Difference: 5%
|
FY 2010: $600,000
FY 2011: $1,340,000
% Difference: 123.3%
|
FY 2010: $4,399,624
FY 2011: $6,223,584
% Difference: 41.5%
|
3.8% Difference |
| Nevada |
FY 2010: $59,543,900
FY 2011: $59,543,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $16,409,739
FY 2011: $3,338,875
% Difference: -79.7%
|
FY 2010: $911,067
FY 2011: $0
% Difference: -100%
|
FY 2010: $105,000
FY 2011: $492,000
% Difference: 368.6%
|
-17.87% Difference |
| New Hampshire |
FY 2010: $34,781,891
FY 2011: $32,467,152
% Difference: -6.7%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $753,222
FY 2011: $1,198,876
% Difference: 59.2%
|
FY 2010: $331,337
FY 2011: $333,337
% Difference: 0.6%
|
-5.2% Difference |
| New Jersey |
FY 2010: $378,832,000
Y 2011: $398,040,409
% Difference: 5.1%
|
FY 2010: $596,094,000
FY 2011: $613,330,000
% Difference: 2.9%
|
FY 2010: $11,545,387
FY 2011: $12,041,639
% Difference: 4.3%
|
Information not provided. |
3.7% Difference |
| New Mexico |
FY 2010: $96,621,000
FY 2011: $88,612,200
% Difference: -8.3%
|
FY 2010: $19,647,400
FY 2011: $14,833,900
% Difference: -24.5%
|
FY 2010: $2,676,800
FY 2011: $2,676,800
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $154,100
FY 2011: $175,600
% Difference: 14%
|
-10.7% Difference |
| New York |
FY 2010: $830,350,427
FY 2011: $893,529,938
% Difference: 7.6%
|
FY 2010: $414,100,000
FY 2011: $414,100,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $22,500,000
FY 2011: $28,300,000
% Difference: 25.8%
|
FY 2010: $5,850,000
FY 2011: $5,715,000
% Difference: -2.3%
|
5.4% Difference |
| North Carolina |
FY 2010: $452,794,720
FY 2011: $405,351,728
% Difference: -10.5%
|
FY 2010: $163,700,000
FY 2011: $161,100,000
% Difference: -1.6%
|
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
-8.1% Difference |
| North Dakota |
FY 2010: $10,956,319
FY 2011: $11,403,515
% Difference: 4.08%
|
FY 2010: $3,405,877
FY 2011: $2,552,178
% Difference: -25.1%
|
FY 2010: $245,000
FY 2011: $255,000
% Difference: 4.08%
|
FY 2010: $1,805,540
FY 2011: $1,879,236
% Difference: 4.08%
|
-1.97% Difference |
| Ohio |
FY 2010: $674,064,773
FY 2011: $674,739,777
% Difference: 0.1%
|
FY 2010: $35,900,000
FY 2011: $23,300,000
% Difference: -35.1%
|
FY 2010: $22,207,728
FY 2011: $27,627,728
% Difference: 24.4%
|
FY 2010: $2,150,000
FY 2011: $2,150,000
% Difference: 0%
|
-0.9% Difference |
| Oklahoma |
FY 2010: $180,478,639
FY 2011: $177,713,946
% Difference: -1.5%
|
FY 2010: $293,412,976
FY 2011: $293,412,976
% Difference: 0%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $2,000,000
FY 2011: $1,760,000
% Difference: -12%
|
-0.6% Difference |
| Oregon |
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $55,000,000
FY 2011: $50,000,000
% Difference: -9.1%
|
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Not able to show percent change. |
| Pennsylvania |
FY 2010: $809,904,000
FY 2011: $819,860,000
% Difference: 1.2%
|
FY 2010: $86,412,000
FY 2011: $85,240,000
% Difference: -1.4%
|
FY 2010: $14,522,000
FY 2011: $16,622,000
% Difference: 14.5%
|
FY 2010: $45,880,000
FY 2011: $44,784,000
% Difference: -2.4%
|
1% Difference |
| Rhode Island |
FY 2010: $46,836,783
FY 2011: $45,744,686
% Difference: -2.3%
|
FY 2010: $700,000
FY 2011: $700,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $792,721
FY 2011: $859,471
% Difference: 8.4%
|
FY 2010: $4,040,406
FY 2011: $4,800,000
% Difference: 18.8%
|
-0.5% Difference |
| South Carolina |
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $35,513,846
FY 2011: $35,301,796
% Difference: -0.6%
|
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Not able to show percent change. |
| South Dakota |
FY 2010: $25,619,875
FY 2011: $22,348,134
% Difference: -12.8%
|
Information not provided. |
FY 2010: $1,073,728
FY 2011: $1,073,728
% Difference: 0%
|
Information not provided. |
12.3% Difference |
| Tennessee |
FY 2010: $257,093,100
FY 2011: $223,107,900
% Difference: -13.2%
|
FY 2010: $83,490,000
FY 2011: $85,404,000
% Difference: 2.3%
|
FY 2010: $12,486,554
FY 2011: $12,893,600
% Difference: 3.3%
|
FY 2010: $45,639,700
FY 2011: $49,154,300
% Difference: 7.7%
|
-7.1% Difference |
| Texas |
FY 2010: $532,000,000
FY 2011: $516,600,000
% Difference: -2.9%
|
FY 2010: $823,300,000
FY 2011: $844,300,000
% Difference: 2.6%
|
FY 2010: $8,900,000
FY 2011: $8,900,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $188,011,757
FY 2011: $168,016,650
% Difference: -10.6%
|
-0.9% Difference |
| Utah |
FY 2010: $2,770,600
FY 2011: $2,781,200
% Difference: 0.4%
|
FY 2010: $1,800,000
FY 2011: $1,764,000
% Difference: -2%
|
FY 2010: $1,450,207
FY 2011: $3,971,765
% Difference: 173.9%
|
FY 2010: $10,469,300
FY 2011: $10,214,700
% Difference: -2.4%
|
13.6% Difference |
| Vermont |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
| Virginia |
FY 2010: $127,386,377
FY 2011: $133,753,941
% Difference: 5%
|
FY 2010: $63,132,253
FY 2011: $67,607,769
% Difference: 7.1%
|
FY 2010: $27,746,467
FY 2011: $26,850,784
% Difference: -3.2%
|
FY 2010: $1,275,000
FY 2011: $1,275,000
% Difference: 0%
|
4.5% Difference |
| Washington |
FY 2010: $313,517,761
FY 2011: $403,842,000
% Difference: 28.8%
|
FY 2010: $54,878,000
FY 2011: $54,685,000
% Difference: -0.4%
|
FY 2010: $26,437,000
FY 2011: $26,555,000
% Difference: 0.4%
|
FY 2010: $235,000
FY 2011: $410,000
% Difference: 74.5%
|
22.9% Difference |
| West Virginia |
FY 2010: $71,294,375
FY 2011: $69,534,084
% Difference: -2.5%
|
FY 2010: $89,941,011
FY 2011: $78,843,055
% Difference: -12.3%
|
FY 2010: $1,078,079
FY 2011: $785,000
% Difference: -27.2%
|
Information not provided. |
-8.1% Difference |
| Wisconsin |
FY 2010: $338,562,000
FY 2011: $342,000,000
% Difference: 1%
|
FY 2010: $125,200,000
FY 2011: $141,700,000
% Difference: 13.2%
|
FY 2010: $2,608,900
FY 2011: $2,626,500
% Difference: 0.7%
|
FY 2010: $6,936,900
FY 2011: $6,960,100
% Difference: 0.3%
|
4.2% Difference |
| Wyoming |
FY 2010: $14,828,328
FY 2011: $15,237,399
% Difference: 2.8%
|
FY 2010: $1,500,000
FY 2011: $1,500,000
% Difference: 0%
|
FY 2010: $1,443,300
FY 2011: $1,760,750
% Difference: 22%
|
FY 2010: $0
FY 2011: $500,000
% Difference: Not able to show percentage change.
|
6.9% Difference |
|
District of Columbia
|
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
|
Puerto Rico
|
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
|
Virgin Islands
|
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
Information not provided. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issues & Resources
Find the NCSLstaff member who handles the issue in which you are interested.
NCSLprovides access to current state and federal legislation and a comprehensive list of state documents, including state statutes, constitutions, legislative audits and research reports.
Members
As legislators and legislative staff, you are part of the nation's largest, most influential and only bipartisan organization of state legislators and staff.Learn about the resources NCSL has for you.
NCSL offers an array of services for legislative staff. Find out what's available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|