Teen Pregnancy Prevention
Teen Pregnancy Prevention
Additional Information
Contact NCSL
|
The National Day to Prevent Teen Pregnancy
May 1, 2013
Interested in highlighting the National Day to Prevent Teen Pregnancy in your state? The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy provides resources to help raise awareness about teen pregnancy and highlights activities around the country to commemorate the day. More.
New Resource!
Teen Childbearing in Rural America
The teen birth rate in rural counties in the United States is nearly one-third higher than the rest of the country, according to new research from The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. This first-of-its-kind analysis finds that the teen birth rate in rural counties exceeds that of both suburban and major urban centers. In fact, as the level of urbanization decreases, the teen birth rate increases. Read the entire report.
Introduction
In 2010, teenage pregnancy rates reached record lows. However, teen pregnancy, birth and abortion rates in the U.S. for teens between the ages of 15 and 19 are still the highest in the industrialized world. Almost two-thirds of births among women under age 18 and more than half of births to those aged 18-19 are unintended.
Teen pregnancy is closely related to many significant social and economic issues, including the educational attainment of teen mothers and their children, poverty, lifetime income disparity for teen parents and overall child wellbeing. Teen mothers face numerous challenges, including financial difficulties, interrupted or postponed education, and unstable relationships.
While this picture is bleak, the outcomes for the children of teen mothers are even worse. The children of teen mothers are more likely to have contact with the child welfare and criminal justice systems than children born to older mothers. Compared to 81 percent of children with older parents, only two-thirds of the children of teens will graduate from high school. Educational attainment affects lifetime income, and many children will never escape the cycle of poverty they are born into. Two-thirds of families started by teens live in poverty and nearly a quarter of teen mothers will depend on welfare within three years of the birth. More often than not, these families are single-parent households—nearly 80 percent of teen mothers do not marry the fathers of their children.
Although teen pregnancy and birth rates have declined by more than one-third since the 1990s, nearly one in three girls still become pregnant by age 20. Such high rates of teen pregnancy cost taxpayers nearly $11 billion in 2008 and include higher costs of public sector health care, child welfare, incarceration, and the lost tax revenues over the lifetime of teen parents and their children, resulting from low educational achievement and reduced earnings. The cost to states varies depending on the size of the state, teen pregnancy rates and participation in publicly funded programs. In 2008 costs ranged from $16 million in North Dakota to $1.2 billion in Texas.

NCSL Resources:
Teen Pregnancy & Education
High School Completion
Teen pregnancy and parenting are significant contributors to the drop-out rates among teen girls. Thirty percent of teenage girls who drop out of high school cite pregnancy or parenthood as a primary reason; this rate is higher for minority students. Thirty-six percent of Hispanic girls and 38 percent of African American teens say they dropped out of school because they became pregnant or had a child. Only around half of teen moms receive their high school diploma compared to nearly 90 percent of women who did not give birth during their teenage years.
Children of Teen Parents
The mother’s education is not the only victim of teen childbearing; children of teen moms often do not perform as well as children of older mothers on early childhood development indicators and school readiness measures such as communication, cognition and social skills. Overall, these children have lower educational performance; they score lower on standardized tests and are twice as likely to repeat a grade. Additionally, only around two-thirds of children born to teen mothers earn a high school diploma, compared to about 80 percent of children born to adults.
Older Teens & Community Colleges
The pregnancy rate for women aged 18 to 19 is three times higher than that of younger teens. Older teens account for nearly 500,000 pregnancies and 300,000 births each year. Nearly 25 percent of births to women in this age group are teens who have previously given birth, greatly increasing the challenges for these mothers and their children. With almost 70 percent of 18- and 19-year-olds attending either high school or college, unplanned pregnancies can disrupt or derail educational achievement. Sixty-one percent of women who have children after enrolling in college fail to complete their degree, a rate which is 65 percent higher than that for students who did not have children. Surveys indicate that close to half of all community college students have been pregnant or gotten someone pregnant at some point.
Resources:
Teen Pregnancy & Poverty
Poverty is both a cause and a consequence of teen pregnancy and child bearing. Two-thirds of young unmarried mothers are poor and around 25 percent go on welfare within three years of a child’s birth. Low educational attainment among teen mothers affects their lifetime income levels. Teen mothers are less likely to complete high school or college, and are therefore also less likely to find well-paying jobs. This reality is evident in the fact that over the past 20 years, the median income for college graduates has increased 19 percent, while income among high school drop-outs has decreased 28 percent.
Only around 20 percent of fathers of children born to teen mothers marry the mothers. Therefore, child support generally represents a vital income source for these single parent families, accounting for 23 percent of family income among families that receive it. However, teen fathers may pay less than $800 a year in child support, compounding financial difficulties for the parent responsible for day to day care. Teen fathers are often poor themselves; research indicates that they are also less educated and experience earning losses of 10-15 percent annually.
Resources:
Teen Pregnancy & Foster Care
Girls in foster care are much more likely to become teen mothers than their peers. By age 19, pregnancy rates for girls in foster care are 2.5 times greater than that of their peers who are not in the system, meaning that nearly half of girls in foster care have become pregnant at least once by their 19th birthday. Depending on the state, children in foster care typically “age out” of the system at age18 or 21. Currently states may provide Medicaid, health insurance jointly funded by states and the federal government, which finances prenatal care, delivery costs, and other health care services for foster children up to age 21. By 2014, however, the ACA will extend Medicaid to cover all young people in foster care up to age 26.
Around 75 percent of teenage girls in foster care report being pregnant by age 21, compared with only one third of their peers; nearly two thirds of teens in foster care have been pregnant more than once by this age. Young men in foster care also have higher pregnancy rates: 50 percent of men aging out of foster care at age 21 say that they have gotten someone pregnant, compared to 19 percent of young men not in foster care.
Resources:
Federal Funding
Recently, the federal government has committed new funding and other resources to addressing teen pregnancy prevention.
Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP):
In September 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services awarded $45 million to 43 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Micronesia to fund programs that emphasize both abstinence and contraception and educate adolescents on how to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Florida returned the award they recieved for FY2010 and has not applied for subesquent years. States may use PREP grants to fund efforts that have been scientifically proven to change behavior, such as delaying sexual activity or increasing contraceptive use.
Programs are required to educate youth age 10-19 about responsible sexual behavior and must also address at least three of the following topics: healthy relationships, adolescent development, financial literacy, parent-child communication skills, education and employment preparation skills, and healthy life skills. Additionally, PREP funded programs are required to target young people who are at a higher risk for teen pregnancy; curricula must be medically accurate and age appropriate.
All states that submitted a plan were assured a minimum of $250,000, with no matching funds required from the state. States and territories that did not apply in 2010 are eligible to apply in 2011 and receive funding for both years, a provision which Hawaii and Nevada both utilized. Those that fail to apply either year will become ineligible to receive PREP funding, although non-profits in the states can compete to receive and administer the programs on behalf of the state. As of March 2012, local organizations and entities, including faith-based organizations, are expecting guidance from HHS to apply for a portion of the funding never claimed by the state governments in Florida, Indiana, North Dakota, Texas, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Marshall Islands and Palau.
Title V State Abstinence Education Grant Program:
The Abstinence Education Program has existed in its current form since 1996, although program funding lapsed briefly in 2009. The ACA renewed abstinence funding through FY 2014. In FY 2010, 29 states and Puerto Rico received nearly $33.5 million in grants for abstinence education. A 43 percent state match is required for states to receive abstinence funds. States may use funds for abstinence education, mentoring, counseling or adult supervised activities. While states are encouraged to use evidence-based programs and are required to address each point in the eight-point definition of abstinence education, individual states may determine how much emphasis to place on each point. Programs are required be medically accurate and to focus on youth at high risk of teen pregnancy, including homeless teens, those in or aging out of foster care, or who live in geographic areas with high teen birth rates.
Pregnancy Assistance Fund
In September 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services awarded $24 million to 17 states to support pregnant and parenting teens and women continuing their education. A competitive state grant program, the Pregnancy Assistance Fund offers pregnant and parenting teens and women a continuous network of support services to assist them in completing educational degrees, whether high school or postsecondary, and to obtain and retain access to health care, family housing and other essential supports. Funds may also be used to combat violence against pregnant women. Through the Pregnancy Assistance Fund, states work with a broad range of stakeholders—such as high schools, institutions of higher education and community organizations—to provide these key services to pregnant teens and women who carry their pregnancies to term, and to parenting mothers.
Resources:
Table 1
|
Federal Funding for Teen Pregnancy Prevention FY2010
|
|
State
|
PREP
|
Title V Abstinence Education
|
Pregnancy Assistance Fund
|
|
Alabama
|
$789,678
|
$867,552
|
---
|
|
Alaska
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Arizona
|
$1,099,599
|
$1,260,254
|
---
|
|
Arkansas
|
$485,372
|
$619,862
|
$1,122,760
|
|
California
|
$6,553,554
|
---
|
$2,000,000
|
|
Colorado
|
$793,058
|
$647,131
|
---
|
|
Connecticut
|
$596,440
|
---
|
$1,999,991
|
|
Delaware
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
District of Columbia
|
$250,000
|
---
|
$1,559,207
|
|
Florida
|
---
|
$2,601,681
|
---
|
|
Georgia
|
$1,707,218
|
$1,810,331
|
---
|
|
Hawaii*
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Idaho
|
$274,861
|
---
|
---
|
|
Illinois
|
$2,231,758
|
---
|
---
|
|
Indiana
|
---
|
---
|
$2,000,000
|
|
Iowa
|
$499,981
|
---
|
---
|
|
Kansas
|
$480,260
|
$359,879
|
---
|
|
Kentucky
|
$696,997
|
$839,352
|
---
|
|
Louisiana
|
$769,607
|
$976,757
|
---
|
|
Maine
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Maryland
|
$962,931
|
$486,550
|
---
|
|
Massachusetts
|
$1,062,646
|
---
|
$1,648,438
|
|
Michigan
|
$1,754,708
|
$1,653,105
|
$500,000
|
|
Minnesota*
|
$868,121
|
$505,743
|
$2,000,000
|
|
Mississippi
|
$537,218
|
$824,462
|
---
|
|
Missouri
|
$991,673
|
$934,278
|
---
|
|
Montana
|
$250,000
|
---
|
$1,000,000
|
|
Nebraska
|
$306,743
|
$210,484
|
---
|
|
Nevada*
|
$819,320
|
---
|
---
|
|
New Hampshire
|
$250,000
|
$93,342
|
---
|
|
New Jersey
|
$1,412,929
|
$913,938
|
---
|
|
New Mexico
|
$346,571
|
---
|
$1,300,000
|
|
New York
|
$3,236,330
|
$2,991,440
|
---
|
|
North Carolina
|
$1,544,312
|
$1,585,347
|
$1,768,000
|
|
North Dakota
|
---
|
$76,707
|
---
|
|
Ohio
|
$1,916,033
|
---
|
---
|
|
Oklahoma
|
$615,320
|
---
|
$900,000
|
|
Oregon
|
$591,798
|
$556,194
|
$800,000
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
$2,046,335
|
$1,642,951
|
---
|
|
Rhode Island
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
South Carolina
|
$760,906
|
$821,923
|
---
|
|
South Dakota
|
$250,000
|
$122,552
|
---
|
|
Tennessee
|
$1,012,182
|
$1,141,533
|
$1,400,000
|
|
Texas
|
---
|
$5,402,595
|
---
|
|
Utah
|
$525,624
|
$319,037
|
---
|
|
Vermont
|
$250,000
|
---
|
$934,481
|
|
Virginia
|
---
|
$889,973
|
$1,500,000
|
|
Washington
|
$1,081,919
|
---
|
$1,567,123
|
|
West Virginia
|
$276,094
|
$313,767
|
---
|
|
Wisconsin
|
$930,024
|
---
|
---
|
|
Wyoming
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Federated States of Micronesia
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Guam
|
---
|
$51,213
|
---
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
---
|
$1,965,832
|
---
|
|
Virgin Islands*
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
*Did not apply for funding in 2010. These ststes did apply in FY 2011, were awarded funding and were retroactively awarded FY2010 funds.
**Florida applied for and was awarded FY2010 funds ($2,795,687), but returned the money. Florida has not applied for subsequent grant funding.
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Click here for FY2011 grants and beyond.
Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative (TPP):
The evidence-based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative (TPP) awarded a total of $100 million in competitive grants to a wide range of agencies and organizations. The grants fund both evidence-based programs and research and demonstration programs that develop, implement or refine innovative strategies for preventing teen pregnancy.
The $100 million includes:
-
$75 million for Tier 1 grants to 75 grantees in 32 states and Washington D.C. Tier 1 grants support the replication of programs that have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing teen pregnancy.
-
$25 million for Tier 2 grants to develop, replicate, refine, and test new models and innovate strategies to prevent and reduce teen pregnancy.
- $15.2 million were awarded for “innovative approaches” programs through a competitive process to projects that focus on areas with high rates and populations with high risk of teen pregnancy.
- $9.8 million supports eight cooperative, community-wide programs that were funded in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control.
Table 2
|
Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative
|
|
State
|
Recipient
|
Funding
|
|
Alabama
|
Tier 1:
Macon County Board of Education
|
$426,172
|
|
Alaska
|
Tier 2:
State Department of Health and Social Services
|
$599,985
|
|
Arizona
|
Tier 1:
Maricopa County Dept. of Health
Touchstone Behavioral Health
|
$859,620
$478,183
|
|
Arkansas
|
---
|
---
|
|
California
|
Tier 1:
Alameda County Health Care Services Agency
Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo county, Inc.
Contra Costa Health Services
Golden Valley Health Centers
Health Research Association
San Diego Youth Services
Tulare Community Health Clinic
Tier 2:
San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools
Volunteers of America of Los Angeles
|
$965,683
$426,507
$999,117
$676,889
$954,527
$1,289,263
$562,161
$458,564
$500,000
|
|
Colorado
|
Tier 1:
Friends First, Inc.
Tier 2:
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
University of Colorado Denver
|
$901,604
$808,785
$924,543
|
|
Connecticut
|
Tier 2: Community Wide
City of Hartford
|
$900,000
|
|
Delaware
|
Tier 1:
West End Neighborhood House, Inc.
|
$589,877
|
|
District of Columbia
|
Tier 1:
Sasha Bruce Youthwork, Inc.
Tier 2:
The George Washington University
|
$634,849
$1,000,000
|
|
Florida
|
Tier 1:
Florida Department of Health
JWB Children’s Services Council of Pinellas County
OIC of Broward County, Inc.
Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando, Inc.
Switchboard of Miami Inc.
Trinity Church, Inc
Tier 2:
Live the Life Ministries, Inc.
|
$3,565,351
$600,000
$998,500
$477,790
$800,000
$998,500
$891,533
|
|
Georgia
|
Tier 1:
The Center for Black Women’s Wellness (CBWW), Inc.
Clayton County Board of Health
Columbus Wellness Center Outreach and Prevention Project, Inc
Metro Atlanta Youth for Christ
Morehouse School of Medicine
More Than Conquerors, Inc
Tier 2: Community Wide
Georgia Campaign for Teen Pregnancy
|
$555,677
$847,517
$627,900
$599,279
$1,500,000
$652,045
$1,500,000
|
|
Hawaii
|
Tier 1:
Hawaii Youth Services Network
Tier 2:
University of Hawaii
|
$999,999
$969,936
|
|
Idaho
|
---
|
---
|
|
Illinois
|
Tier 1:
Chicago Public Schools, District #299
Children’s Home and Aid Society of Illinois
|
$3,943,607
$1,443,303
|
|
Indiana
|
Tier 2:
PATH, Inc.
|
$998,164
|
|
Iowa
|
---
|
---
|
|
Kansas
|
---
|
---
|
|
Kentucky
|
Tier 2:
University of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc.
|
$963,331
|
|
Louisiana
|
Tier 1:
Central Louisiana Area Health Education Center Foundation
Institute of Women and Ethnic Studies
Louisiana DHH Office of Public Health
Louisiana Public Health Institute
Tier 2:
Tulane University
|
$406,849
$599,680
$2,200,000
$1,397,750
$547,239
|
|
Maine
|
---
|
---
|
|
Maryland
|
Tier 1:
Women Accepting Responsibility, Inc.
Young Men’s Christian Association of Cumberland MD, Inc.
|
$890,798
$451,340
|
|
Massachusetts
|
Tier 1:
Congegacion Leon de Juda
La Alianza Hispana, Inc.
Tier 2:
Black Ministerial Alliance of Greater Boston
Boston Medical Center
Tier 2: Community Wide
Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy
|
$599,889
$463,934
$1,000,000
$572,516
$1,177,051
|
|
Michigan
|
Tier 1:
Teen HYPE Youth Development Program
YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit
|
$588,981
$981,856
|
|
Minnesota
|
Tier 1:
Hennepin County
|
$3,287,453
|
|
Mississippi
|
Tier 1:
Southeast Mississippi Rural Health Initiative, Inc.
Youth Opportunities Unlimited, Inc.
|
$500,000
$1,014,493
|
|
Missouri
|
Tier 1:
Better Family Life, Inc.
Washington University
The Women’s Clinic of Kansas City
|
$998,500
$400,000
$1,045,158
|
|
Montana
|
---
|
---
|
|
Nebraska
|
---
|
---
|
|
Nevada
|
Tier 1:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Southern Nevada Health District
|
$559,821
$997,257
|
|
New Hampshire
|
---
|
---
|
|
New Jersey
|
Tier 1:
The Regional Perinatal Consortium of Monmouth and Ocean County
South Jersey Healthcare
Tier 2:
Princeton Center for Leadership Training
|
$481,326
$1,000,000
$965,522
|
|
New Mexico
|
Tier 1:
Capacity Builders, Inc.
Tier 2:
National Indian Youth Leadership Project
|
$988,184
$555,706
|
|
New York
|
Tier 1:
City of Rochester
Grand Street Settlement, Inc.
Morris Heights Health Center
New York City Mission Society
Planned Parenthood of New York City, Inc.
Program Reach, Inc.
Tier 2:
Engender Health, Inc.
Tier 2: Community Wide
Fund for Public Health in New York, Inc.
|
$1,499,705
$600,000
$791,715
$520,302
$611,823
$1,209,010
$976,408
$1,500,000
|
|
North Carolina
|
Tier 1:
Family Resource Center of Raleigh, Inc.
Iredell-Statesville Schools
Tier 2: Community Wide
Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention of North Carolina
|
$796,916
$807,597
$1,163,553
|
|
North Dakota
|
---
|
---
|
|
Ohio
|
Tier 1:
Young Women’s Christian Association of Hamilton Ohio
|
$405,575
|
|
Oklahoma
|
Tier 1:
Youth Services of Tulsa Inc.
|
$431,543
|
|
Oregon
|
---
|
---
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
Tier 1:
Carnegie Mellon University
Opportunities Industrialization Centers of America, Inc. (OICA)
Tier 2: Community Wide
Family Planning Council
|
$1,480,578
$1,000,000
$884,840
|
|
Rhode Island
|
---
|
---
|
|
South Carolina
|
Tier 1:
South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Pregnancy
Tier 2: Community Wide
South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy
|
$1,469,480
$1,486,232
|
|
South Dakota
|
Tier 1:
Rural America Initiatives
Tier 2:
Rural America Initiatives
|
$599,621
$599,581
|
|
Tennessee
|
Tier 1:
Centerstone of Tennessee, Inc.
Knox County Health Department
Douglas-Cherokee Economic Authority, Inc.
Le Bonheur Community Health and Well-Being
|
$1,000,000
$602,846
$600,000
$800,000
|
|
Texas
|
Tier 1:
Navasota ISD
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Youth and Family Alliance dba LifeWorks
Tier 2:
Arlington Independent School District
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Tier 2: Community Wide
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
|
$999,030
$3,000,000
$585,000
$995,675
$851,450
$1,209,387
|
|
Utah
|
---
|
---
|
|
Vermont
|
Tier 1:
New England Network for Child, Youth & Family Service, Inc.
|
$600,000
|
|
Virginia
|
---
|
---
|
|
Washington
|
Tier 1:
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest
|
$4,000,000
|
|
West Virginia
|
Tier 1:
Children’s Home Society of West Virginia, Inc.
Mission West Virginina, Inc.
|
$850,000
$914,347
|
|
Wisconsin
|
Tier 1:
Irwin A. and Robert D. Goodman Community Center, Inc.
|
$596,723
|
|
Wyoming
|
---
|
---
|
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Not Making the Grade: Academic Achievement Difficult for Teen Parents
Thirty percent of teenage girls who drop out of school cite pregnancy and parenthood as key reasons; however, rates among Hispanic and African American girls are higher, at 36 percent and 38 percent,
respectively. Educational achievement affects the lifetime income of teen mothers: two-thirds of families started by teens are poor, and nearly one in four will depend on welfare within three years of a child’s birth. Many children will not escape this cycle of poverty. Only about two-thirds of children born to teen mothers earn a high school diploma, compared to 81 percent of their peers with older parents.
The Numbers Don’t Add Up to Success
-
Only 40 percent of teen mothers finish high school; fewer than 2 percent finish college by age 30.
-
Young women who give birth while attending a community college are 65 percent less likely to complete their degree than women who do not have children during that time.
-
Children of teen mothers perform worse on many measures of school readiness, are 50 percent more likely to repeat a grade, and are more likely than children born to older mothers to drop out of high school.
State Policy Options
-
Incorporate teen pregnancy prevention into state efforts to reduce the dropout rate and improve educational attainment.
-
Educate community college students about the importance of pregnancy planning for college success and completion through orientation, first year experience, academic courses, service learning, or other student-led activities.
-
Develop access to online courses, flexible scheduling and other services to help young mothers earn their high school diplomas or GEDs.
-
Make full and effective use of federal funding for teen pregnancy prevention through the Personal Responsibility Education Program, Title V Abstinence Education Program, and the Pregnancy Assistance Fund. In 2010, 17 states received pregnancy assistance grants to support pregnant and parenting teens and women with continuing their education.
Sources: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, “Preventing Teen Pregnancy is Critical to School Completion,” Briefly… (Washington, D.C.) July 2010; The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, “Unplanned Pregnancy: What Community Colleges Can Do,” Briefly… (Washington, D.C.) May 2008.
|