By Lisa Soronen

The odds were against state and local government in the Brandt case for the most compelling reason possible: Precedent (old, but pretty much on point) contradicted our position. 

Yet there was some reason for hope at the oral argument. Justice Stephen Breyer referred to the State and Local Legal Center amicus curiae brief, which NCSL joined, by name at oral argument and discussed one of the brief’s arguments. Hopes were dashed when the court issued an opinion against the United States joined by all members of the court except Justice Sonia Sotomayor.   

In Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States, the court held that a private party, rather than the federal government, owns an abandoned railroad right-of-way granted by the General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875. When the federal government owns abandoned railroad rights-of-way, state and local governments may convert them into “Rails-to-Trails.”  

In 1908, the U.S. granted the Laramie, Hahn’s Peak and Pacific Railroad Company a right-of-way to build a railroad over public land in Wyoming pursuant to the General Railroad Right of Way Act of 1875. In 1976, the U.S. granted to the Brandts a parcel of land that this right-of-way ran through. In 2004, the successor railroad abandoned the right-of-way. The Brandts contested the United States claim that it owns the abandoned right-of-way.

The court ruled against the United States “in large part because it won when it argued the opposite before this Court more than 70 years ago in the case of Great Northern Railway Co. v. United States.” In Great Northern, oil was discovered under an 1875 Act right-of-way. The U.S. claimed the railroad had been given only an easement (and the United States owned everything beneath the surface) because after 1871, when Congress stopped giving railroads parcels of land and only gave them rights-of-way, the U.S. also stopped retaining a right of reverter in the event of abandonment and instead granted railroads mere easements.

The U.S. and the SLLC argued that the court should not read Great Northern as broadly and that a series of federal statutes apply to abandoned 1875 rights-of-way and grant the United States title to abandoned rights-of-way unless a state or local government establishes a “public highway,” including a recreational trail, within one year of abandonment. 

The justices discussed at oral argument the SLLC brief that argued that state and local governments have relied on these statutes. Yet the court concluded they don’t apply to 1875 rights-of-way because “these statutes do not tell us whether the United States has an interest in any particular right of way; they simply tell us how any interest the United States might have should be disposed of.”

Sotomayor summarizes why this case is a loss for federal, state and local government:  “[T]he Court undermines the legality of thousands of miles of former rights of way that the public now enjoys as means of transportation and recreation. And lawsuits challenging the conversion of former rails to recreational trails alone may well cost American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.”

Lisa Soronen is executive director of the State and Local Legal Center. She writes frequently on Supreme Court cases for the NCSL Blog.

Posted in: NCSL, Public Policy
Actions: E-mail | Permalink |

Subscribe to the NCSL Blog

Click on the RSS feed at left to add the NCSL Blog to your favorite RSS reader. 

Blog Archives | By Category

About the NCSL Blog

This blog offers updates on the National Conference of State Legislatures' research and training, the latest on federalism and the state legislative institution, and posts about state legislators and legislative staff. The blog is edited by NCSL staff and written primarily by NCSL's experts on public policy and the state legislative institution.


Share this: 
We are the nation's most respected bipartisan organization providing states support, ideas, connections and a strong voice on Capitol Hill.

NCSL Member Toolbox


7700 East First Place
Denver, CO 80230
Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800


444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515
Washington, D.C. 20001
Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069

Copyright 2015 by National Conference of State Legislatures