National Conference of State Legislatures - The Forum for America's Ideas
Issues & Research » Telecommunications & Information Technology » Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and Privacy
Go 13442
Share Send a comment

State Statutes Relating to Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and Privacy 

As of January 14, 2010


Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology can be thought of as a next-generation bar code. A simple RFID tag consists of a microchip and antenna, which when stimulated by a remote reader, sends back information via radio waves.  The use of RFID has raised privacy concerns in some states, particularly with regard to linking personal information with RFID tags.  

(See also  2009 legislation, 2008 legislation2007 legislation, 2006 legislation, 2005 legislation, and additional background information with 2004 legislation.)

State

Year Enacted

Statutory Citation and Bill Number

Prohibits Requiring Implantation of a RFID Microchip

Prohibits Unauthorized "Skimming" of RFID in ID Cards

Relates to Use of RFID in Driver's Licenses or Vehicles

Creates Study Commission or Task Force

Other

 Arkansas  2009

 Ark. Code § 27-16-1206 (H.B. 1308)

    Prohibits the Office of Driver Services of the Department of Finance and Administration from including an electronic chip or any type of radio frequency identification (RFID) tag or chip in any
driver's license or identification cards.
   

California

2008

Cal. Civil Code § 52.7 (S.B. 31)

 X

 

 

 

 

California

2007

2009

Cal. Civil Code §§ 1798.79, 1798.795 (2005 S.B. 362 and 2009 S.B. 544)

 

 X

 

 

 

California

2005

Cal. Fin. Code § 13082(a)(2)
(A.B. 1489)

 

 

 

 

Relates to automated teller machines.  Requires any technology used, such as RFID, that enables a visually impaired person to access an ATM, to provide the same degree of privacy available to all individuals.

Michigan

2008

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.304
(H.B. 5535)

 

 

Requires an enhanced driver's license or state identification card to include RFID technology, limited to a randomly assigned number that is encrypted, if agreed to by the Department of Homeland Security. Requires the secretary of state to ensure that the RFID technology is secure from unauthorized access and includes reasonable security measures to protect against unauthorized disclosure of personal information. An applicant is required to sign a declaration acknowledging his or her understanding of the RFID technology before he or she is issued an enhanced driver's license or enhanced state ID card.

 

 

Nevada 2009

Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 205.461 to 205.4675

(S.B. 125)

  X    
Prohibits capturing, storing, or reading information from a person's RFID document for the purpose of knowingly or intentionally committing fraud, identity theft or any other unlawful act, without that person's prior knowledge and consent.  An RFID document is a document containing data that are issued to an individual for the primary purpose of establishing identity.

New Hampshire

2006

H.B. 203 

 

 

 

 

Creates a commission to study the use of RFID in the private and public sectors, including its benefits and potential privacy implications. (Final Report, Nov. 24, 2008.)

 

New Hampshire

2006

N.H. Rev. Stat. § 236:130 (H.B. 1738)

 

 

Prohibits the use of surveillance devices on New Hampshire highways unless authorized by statute or under certain circumstances.

 

 

North Dakota

2007

N.D. Cent. Code, § 12.1-15-06 
(S.B. 2415)

X

 

 

 

 

Oklahoma

2008

Okla. Stat. § 63-1-1430 (S.B. 47)

X

 

 

 

 

 Rhode
 Island
 2009  2009 H.B. 6094/S.B. 211
Chapter 09-380/09-371
        Prohibits the use of RFID for the purpose of tracking the movement or identity of any student on school grounds, at school functions, or while being transported to or from school grounds or school functions.

Texas

2007

Tex. Trans. Code § 521.032 (c) (S.B. 11 F)

 

 

Requires the Department of Transportation to ensure that any enhanced driver's license or personal identification that includes a RFID chip or similar technology is encrypted or otherwise secure from unauthorized access.

Prohibits the sale or disclosure of any information from an enhanced driver's license RFI chip or similar technology.

 

 

Vermont

2008

23 V.S.A. §7

23 V.S.A. §8 (S.B. 358)

 

 

Prohibits compiling or maintaining a database of electronically readable information derived from an identification card.

Requires personal RFID chip numbers be given protections as codified in 18 U.S.C. § 2721 et seq. (Drivers Privacy Protection Act).

 

 

 Virginia  2009

Code of Virginia § 46.2-323.01 
(S.B. 1046)

    States that the Department willl not comply with any federal law or regulation that would require the use any type of computer chip or RFID tag or other similar device on or in a driver.    

Washington

 2007

Rev. Code Wash. § 46.20.202 (c)

(H.B. 1289)

    Requires that if an enhanced driver's license or identicard includes a RFID chip, or similar technology, that it be encrypted or otherwise secure from unauthorized access.    

Washington

2008

Rev. Code Wash. § 9A.58.020 (H.B. 1031)

 

X

 

 

 

Washington

2008

Rev. Code Wash. §§ 42.56.230(5), 42.56.330(8) (H.B. 2729)

 

 

Requires that personally identifying information on a driver's license or identicard that includes an RFID chip or similar technology (to facilitate border crossings) may be disclosed in aggregate form as long as it does not contain any personally identifying information.

 

 
Washington  2009

Rev. Code Wash §§ 19.300.010, 19.300.020, 19.300.030

(HB 1011 - Ch. No. 66)

  X     Prohibits the scanning of an RFID card by anyone except the business or agency that issued the tag with the following exceptions: When scanning is part of a sales transaction initiated by the tag holder; when data are remotely read or stored in the course of an act of good-faith security research, experimentation or scientific inquiry; when the use of RFID is for triage or medial care in the case of a public disaster; when a court orders electronic monitoring; when it is used for incarcerated individuals; and when police need to  read a lost identification document.

Wisconsin

2006

Wis. Stats. § 146.25 (A.B. 290)

X

 

 

 

 

 

Contact:  Pam Greenberg, NCSL Denver Office, 303-364-7700 ext. 1413, pam.greenberg@ncsl.org

 

State Statutes Relating to Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and Privacy 

As of January 14, 2010


Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology can be thought of as a next-generation bar code. A simple RFID tag consists of a microchip and antenna, which when stimulated by a remote reader, sends back information via radio waves.  The use of RFID has raised privacy concerns in some states, particularly with regard to linking personal information with RFID tags.  

(See also  2009 legislation, 2008 legislation2007 legislation, 2006 legislation, 2005 legislation, and additional background information with 2004 legislation.)

State

Year Enacted

Statutory Citation and Bill Number

Prohibits Requiring Implantation of a RFID Microchip

Prohibits Unauthorized "Skimming" of RFID in ID Cards

Relates to Use of RFID in Driver's Licenses or Vehicles

Creates Study Commission or Task Force

Other

 Arkansas  2009

 Ark. Code § 27-16-1206 (H.B. 1308)

    Prohibits the Office of Driver Services of the Department of Finance and Administration from including an electronic chip or any type of radio frequency identification (RFID) tag or chip in any
driver's license or identification cards.
   

California

2008

Cal. Civil Code § 52.7 (S.B. 31)

 X

 

 

 

 

California

2007

2009

Cal. Civil Code §§ 1798.79, 1798.795 (2005 S.B. 362 and 2009 S.B. 544)

 

 X

 

 

 

California

2005

Cal. Fin. Code § 13082(a)(2)
(A.B. 1489)

 

 

 

 

Relates to automated teller machines.  Requires any technology used, such as RFID, that enables a visually impaired person to access an ATM, to provide the same degree of privacy available to all individuals.

Michigan

2008

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.304
(H.B. 5535)

 

 

Requires an enhanced driver's license or state identification card to include RFID technology, limited to a randomly assigned number that is encrypted, if agreed to by the Department of Homeland Security. Requires the secretary of state to ensure that the RFID technology is secure from unauthorized access and includes reasonable security measures to protect against unauthorized disclosure of personal information. An applicant is required to sign a declaration acknowledging his or her understanding of the RFID technology before he or she is issued an enhanced driver's license or enhanced state ID card.

 

 

Nevada 2009

Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 205.461 to 205.4675

(S.B. 125)

  X    
Prohibits capturing, storing, or reading information from a person's RFID document for the purpose of knowingly or intentionally committing fraud, identity theft or any other unlawful act, without that person's prior knowledge and consent.  An RFID document is a document containing data that are issued to an individual for the primary purpose of establishing identity.

New Hampshire

2006

H.B. 203 

 

 

 

 

Creates a commission to study the use of RFID in the private and public sectors, including its benefits and potential privacy implications. (Final Report, Nov. 24, 2008.)

 

New Hampshire

2006

N.H. Rev. Stat. § 236:130 (H.B. 1738)

 

 

Prohibits the use of surveillance devices on New Hampshire highways unless authorized by statute or under certain circumstances.

 

 

North Dakota

2007

N.D. Cent. Code, § 12.1-15-06 
(S.B. 2415)

X

 

 

 

 

Oklahoma

2008

Okla. Stat. § 63-1-1430 (S.B. 47)

X

 

 

 

 

 Rhode
 Island
 2009  2009 H.B. 6094/S.B. 211
Chapter 09-380/09-371
        Prohibits the use of RFID for the purpose of tracking the movement or identity of any student on school grounds, at school functions, or while being transported to or from school grounds or school functions.

Texas

2007

Tex. Trans. Code § 521.032 (c) (S.B. 11 F)

 

 

Requires the Department of Transportation to ensure that any enhanced driver's license or personal identification that includes a RFID chip or similar technology is encrypted or otherwise secure from unauthorized access.

Prohibits the sale or disclosure of any information from an enhanced driver's license RFI chip or similar technology.

 

 

Vermont

2008

23 V.S.A. §7

23 V.S.A. §8 (S.B. 358)

 

 

Prohibits compiling or maintaining a database of electronically readable information derived from an identification card.

Requires personal RFID chip numbers be given protections as codified in 18 U.S.C. § 2721 et seq. (Drivers Privacy Protection Act).

 

 

 Virginia  2009

Code of Virginia § 46.2-323.01 
(S.B. 1046)

    States that the Department willl not comply with any federal law or regulation that would require the use any type of computer chip or RFID tag or other similar device on or in a driver.    

Washington

 2007

Rev. Code Wash. § 46.20.202 (c)

(H.B. 1289)

    Requires that if an enhanced driver's license or identicard includes a RFID chip, or similar technology, that it be encrypted or otherwise secure from unauthorized access.    

Washington

2008

Rev. Code Wash. § 9A.58.020 (H.B. 1031)

 

X

 

 

 

Washington

2008

Rev. Code Wash. §§ 42.56.230(5), 42.56.330(8) (H.B. 2729)

 

 

Requires that personally identifying information on a driver's license or identicard that includes an RFID chip or similar technology (to facilitate border crossings) may be disclosed in aggregate form as long as it does not contain any personally identifying information.

 

 
Washington  2009

Rev. Code Wash §§ 19.300.010, 19.300.020, 19.300.030

(HB 1011 - Ch. No. 66)

  X     Prohibits the scanning of an RFID card by anyone except the business or agency that issued the tag with the following exceptions: When scanning is part of a sales transaction initiated by the tag holder; when data are remotely read or stored in the course of an act of good-faith security research, experimentation or scientific inquiry; when the use of RFID is for triage or medial care in the case of a public disaster; when a court orders electronic monitoring; when it is used for incarcerated individuals; and when police need to  read a lost identification document.

Wisconsin

2006

Wis. Stats. § 146.25 (A.B. 290)

X

 

 

 

 

 

Contact:  Pam Greenberg, NCSL Denver Office, 303-364-7700 ext. 1413, pam.greenberg@ncsl.org

 

Denver Office
Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230

 

Washington Office
Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001

Denver Office
Tel: 303-364-7700 | Fax: 303-364-7800 | 7700 East First Place | Denver, CO 80230

 

Washington Office
Tel: 202-624-5400 | Fax: 202-737-1069 | 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 | Washington, D.C. 20001

©2010 National Conference of State Legislatures.  All Rights Reserved. 

©2010 National Conference of State Legislatures.  All Rights Reserved.