State Legislation and Actions on Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)
and Consumer-Directed Health Plans, 2004-2009
Updated: June 1, 2009; reposted 11/5/2009
|
Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) were established in federal law in December 2003, when President Bush signed the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-173). HSAs are tax-free financial accounts that are designed to help individuals save for future health care expenses. HSAs also are an expansion and evolution of Medical Savings Accounts (MSAs), which were launched in over 20 states and in a federal pilot program in the mid-1990s.
|
|

|
State laws and regulations passed in 2004-08 now play a role in the use of health savings accounts, through insurance regulation, measures that encourage development or offering of HSAs and/or laws that provide state tax exemptions to parallel federal tax treatment. HSA laws and commercial marketing usually are closely tied to High-Deductible Health Plans and are referred to as "Consumer-Directed Health Plans."1
|
Latest Reports
NCSL Resources
-
"State Legislation Relating to Disclosure of Hospital and Health Charges" - NCSL report on price transparency, a useful feature for HSA users. updated 3/09.
-
INDIANA Places HSAs at the Center of Coverage Expansion - feature in NCSL State Health Notes, May 14, 2007.
-
Consumer-Driven Health Care, HSAs and States - PowerPoint by Richard Cauchi for NCSL Fiscal Analysts, 9/6/06. 
-
"Power to the Patient: Can high-deductible plans and health savings accounts lower premium costs and replace the traditional goal of comprehensive insurance?" State Legislatures Magazine, 5/06. 
-
"NCSL session: "Consumer Driven Health Insurance: New State Solutions in 2006?" at Spring Forum, April 7, 2006. From corporate boardrooms to the President's State of the Union, the idea of health savings accounts has attracted attention, support and nagging concerns. In 2005 at least 26 states enacted laws directly affecting health savings accounts and their associated high-deductible health insurance plans. At least three states hope to integrate "CDHPs" into Medicaid via legislation and federal waivers. These market-based tools are aimed at lowering premium costs and requiring increased consumer responsibility. Yet the "bare bones" policies often associated with such plans may leave a family with hefty charges for routine or not-so-routine medical services. This "mini-summit" 2 hour session examined facts, opinions and some unknowns.
Funded in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the NCSL Critical Health Areas Project (CHAP). Speakers:
- NCSL Issue Brief: "Health Savings Accounts" - published March 2005 [Password required for Legislators and Legislative Staff]. *
|
Who is eligible for HSAs?
There are four federal requirements to be eligible for HSAs:
- A person must be covered simultaneously by a qualified “high-deductible” health insurance policy (HDHP).
For 2009, participants in qualified HDHPs are required to pay the first $1,150 of their medical expenses ($2,300 for family coverage) before insurance benefits begin. This is an increase from the 2007 and 2008 deductible of at least $1,100 for an individual or $2,200 for families; the 2006 dedictible was $1,050 individual/$2,100 family.
(Conventional insurance plans, whose participants cannot contribute to HSAs, typically have deductibles of about one-third these amounts.)
- The HSA enrollee cannot be covered by any other health insurance plan, such as a spouse’s plan.
- The HSA enrollee must be under age 65.
- The HSA enrollee cannot be claimed as a dependent on someone else’s federal income tax return.
There are no income, employment or other age limits in the federal law. For 2009:
-
Contributions are limited in 2009 to $3,000 for taxpayers with individual HDHP coverage and to $5,950 for those with family HDHP coverage. Individuals who are aged 55 and older can contribute an additional $1,000.
-
The maximum annual HSA contribution for an eligible individual with self-only coverage is $2,900; for family coverage it is $5,800.
-
The annual out-of-pocket expenses under qualified HDHP plans (including deductibles, co-pays, and co-insurance) cannot exceed: $5,800* for Individual/self-only coverage or $11,600* for Family coverage in 2008. (This is an increase of $200 for an individual and $400 for a family from 2008).
(See Appendix B for earlier history of 2004 and 2005 inflation adjustments.)
What is Covered or Allowable for HSA Payments?
Traditional medical costs such as diagnosis and treatment of disease are allowable, as well as routine medical visits. In addition, many expenses that may not be covered by traditional health insurance can be paid for through HSA accounts. These include prescription drugs and some non-prescription drugs, eye care, dental care, COBRA premiums, acupuncture, Braille books, midwife services, seeing-eye dogs, qualified long-term care services, and more. If an enrollee uses HSA money for non-medical expenses and is under the age of 65 or not disabled, he or she will incur a 10 percent penalty in addition to owing regular federal income tax on such amounts.
An employer may elect to contribute financially to an employee HSA as much or as little as they choose (while staying below the annual legal limit on the account of $2,850 or $5,650 for employees with family coverage).
What are "Medical Savings Accounts" (MSAs)?
MSAs are accounts established during the earlier decade, 1993-2003, for covered individuals and their families. They helped finance part of the cost of the deductibles, co-payments, and other medical expenses that are not covered by a person's health insurance plan. These earlier plans generally are not preempted or eliminated by the new federal law.
Which States have had MSA laws (pre-HSA)?
In the early to mid-1990's several states, including Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Michigan, Mississippi, and Missouri pioneered Medical Savings Accounts state laws. Congress responded in 1996 with a federal pilot program, contained within HIPAA. This led to at least 15 additional states enacting their own MSA laws, for a total of 26 states with MSA laws as of December 2003. These states are: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
What is the difference between a Medical Savings Account (MSA) and a Health Savings Account?
- Lower deductibles; for example, HSAs are combined with "high deductible insurance" with deductibles of $1,100 for individuals and $2,200 for families. The MSA accounts usually required combination with high deductible health insurance no lower than $1,700 for an individual and $3,450 for families.
- HSAs allow contributions of 100 percent of the full deductible up to a limit of $2,850 for individuals and $5,650 for family coverage. MSAs allowed for 65 percent of an individual’s health insurance deductible, and 75 percent of a family’s.
- With HSAs, unused balances roll over from year to year. HSAs also can move with an employee from one employer to another.
- HSAs apply to all employers. Most MSAs only apply to small employers of 50 employees or less.
- HSAs can be funded by employer and/or employee contributions. MSAs had to be only employee contribution or only employer contributions, not both.
- HSAs apply an extra tax penalty of 10 percent for non-health distributions made before death, disability or age 65. The penalty is 15 percent for MSAs.

2005-08 Activities
Four years after the federal HSA authorization, the commercial market has become far more involved in offering and promoting HAS accounts to the general public. Many technical issues were not resolved until the summer of 2004, when the US Treasury developed formal guidelines. "Insurers are going crazy to get products out," according to Medscape, a professional news service, quoting Dan Perrin, Executive Director of the HSA Coalition, a Washington, DC group that has worked to promote the accounts. In late 2004, Humana, UnitedHealth Group, and the Blue Cross network all announced new or expanded entries into the market of "consumer-driven health plans."
"By the Numbers: 2008-09 Surveys":
A new survey, released November 2009 provides a useful overview and detail, without advocacy or opposition. A key synopsis from the authors at Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI). :
|
Employer Contributions Shifting in Consumer-Driven Health Plans - published in the November 2009 EBRI Notes
Among the roughly 4 percent of covered Americans who have so-called “consumer-driven” health plans, contributions to the plans by their employers are shifting: Workers with employee-only coverage have seen their annual employer contributions decrease, while those with family coverage have seen their annual employer contributions increase. The report examines the availability of health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) and health savings account (HSA)-eligible plans as well as employer and individual contribution behavior, time enrolled in such plans, account balances, and rollover behavior.
Contributions: The percentage of workers with an HRA or HSA plan whose employer contributes to the account has not changed statistically since 2006, the percentage of employers making contributions dropped from 67 percent in 2008 to 63 percent in 2009.
Among workers with an employer contribution, those with employee-only coverage saw their annual employer contributions increase between 2006 and 2008, but fall in 2009. Between 2006 and 2008, the percentage of workers with employee-only coverage reporting that their employer contributed $1,000 or more to the account increased from 26 percent to 37 percent, but in 2009, it fell to 32 per-cent. The percentage of workers with an employer contribution of less than $200 increased from 3 per-cent to 8 percent between 2008 and 2009.
In contrast, among workers with family coverage, employer contribution levels increased in 2009. The percentage of workers receiving a contribution of $1,000 or more increased from 59 percent in 2008 to 73 percent in 2009. Nearly three-quarters of workers with family coverage in a consumer-driven health plan (CDHP) now receive an annual employer contribution of $1,000 or more.
|
2005 Laws: HSA-related laws were signed in at least 26 states, including Arizona, Arkansas (2), Florida (3), Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas (3), Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi (2), Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas (2), Virginia (2) and Washington.
2006 Laws: HSA-related laws were signed in: Massachusetts, Ohio (2), Pennsylvania and Utah.
2007 Laws: HSA-related laws so far have been signed in 19 states: Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Utah and Washington.
2008 Laws: HSA-related laws were signed in at least seven states: Georgia, Kansas, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.
2009 Laws: HSA-related laws so far have been signed in two states: Utah and Virginia.
Map of States with HSA Laws passed in 2004-2006
 |
MAP KEY
This map includes HSA-related state laws enacted:
> in 2004 (dark green)
> in 2005 (bright green)
> in 2006 (light green)
For states with laws passed in multiple years, generally the earliest law is coded on the map. Medical Savings Account Laws (1994-2003) are not color-coded. Laws have varying effects
CORRECTION: This map clarifies the map published in State Legislatures magazine (Page 24, May 2006) which only shows laws enacted in 2005.
|
|
Map of States with HSA Laws and Resolutions passed in 2007-08
|
|
|

|
MAP KEY
This map includes HSA-related state laws and resolutions enacted:
> in 2007 (blue)
|
State Laws and State Obstacles to HSAs
According to an analysis of existing laws conducted by insurers, there are three broad categories of state laws related to state tax treatment of HSAs. An updated analysis including NCSL data shows the following:
| HSA Policy |
States |
Totals |
| States that conformed to federal Internal Revenue Code for HSA Purposes, 12/04 |
AZ, CO, CT, DE, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, LA, MD, MI, MO, MT, NE, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, RI ('04), SC, UT, VT VA, WV
(+ see below) |
30 |
| > States that changed laws in 2005 to conform to federal IR Code for HSAs |
AR, FL, GA, IN, IA, KY, MA, MN, MS, NV, NJ, OK, PA
(as of 12/31/05; effective dates vary) |
14 |
| > States that changed laws in 2006 for HSAs |
MA, OH, UT |
2 |
| States that do not provide state tax exemption(*) |
AL*, CA*, NJ*, PAD, WI*
[These states are not necessarily out of conformity with the federal law. This list is not intended as an analysis of state income tax status] |
5 |
| States that do not have state income tax |
AK, FL, NH, SD, TN, TX, WA, WY |
8 |
| States with HSAs for High Risk Pool plans |
AL, AR ('05), CO, ID ('05), KY, LA, MD, MN, MO, NE, SD, WY |
12 |
| States with HSAs for state employees - examples |
AR ('04), FL ('05), KS ('06), OK ('05), SC ('05), SD ('04), UT ('06), WA ('06) |
|
NOTES: A) Although HSA contributions are exempt from federal taxes, as of the 2005 tax year, six states — Alabama, California, Maine, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — did not exempt HSA dollars from state taxes, [5]
B) See STATE INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAXES, 2006 ; HSA State Income Tax Chart, 1/2007
C) NH State Income Tax is Limited to Dividends and Interest Income Only.
D) PA excludes from taxation HSA contributions by employers but not by individual employees, based on language in their 2005 law, HB 107
State Conformity: An evolving Issue
On Jan. 1, 2004, when HSA-based health plans became available, laws in 17 states included "structural impediments" that made it difficult to pair an HDHP with an HSA, says Larry Akey, a spokesperson for America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the trade association for health insurers.
As of October 2006, "Inside Consumer-Directed Care" Newsletter reported that "just four" states have structural impediments to HSA-HDHP pairing: Alabama, California, New Jersey and Wisconsin. Three other states - Illinois, Missouri and New York - have "HMO deductible limitations and/or mandated benefit impediments to offering an HSA-based plan according to AHIP spokesperson Mohit Ghose.
Earlier, in August 2005, Inside Consumer-Directed Care reported that, "Insurance commissioners in Rhode Island, Pennsylvania and Florida reported that lawmakers in their states recently removed legal roadblocks that would have made it impossible, or at least difficult, to pair a health savings account (HSA) with a high-deductible health plan (HDHP). But the clock is ticking for legislators in several states that still have laws on the books that could prevent or impede the adoption of HSA-based health plans on Jan. 1, 2006, when a two-year "transition period" granted by the Treasury Dept. comes to a close."
(Note that there are differing interpretations of what change is needed.) While some states — including Illinois, Maine and Missouri — allow insurers to pair high-deductible PPOs with HSAs, they can't couple the accounts with a high-deductible HMO. "Our HMOs cannot be used with an HSA because the deductibles are too low. By our definition, a plan that has a high deductible is not an HMO," says Sue Hofer, a spokesperson for the Illinois Division of Insurance. "We expect that employers that want to offer HSA-qualified plans will do so by offering a [high-deductible] PPO."
For a 2006 analysis of state laws, especially the impact of existing state mandate and "first-dollar coverage" requirements, see
HSA State Implementation Issues Report by CAHI, January 2006.
State Fiscal Impacts of HSA Tax Law Changes
When a state adds an HSA-specific income tax exemption the resulting tax savings for the individuals also mean loss of state revenue. In the start-up phase of 2005-2006 it has been relatively difficult for states to know the tax impact of HSA exemptions. However, for the NCSL study of 2005 State Tax Actions, staff author Bert Waisanen reported the following:
| State |
HSA Tax law |
Revenue loss
FY '06 (millions) |
Revenue loss
FY '07 (millions) |
| KY |
H.B. 272. Adopt federal provisions for health savings accounts. |
-$2.6 |
-$3.0 mil |
| MN |
Federal update to health savings accounts. Effective 1/04. |
-$5.2 |
-3.0 |
Medicaid: Health Opportunity Accounts (HOA)
The federal Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) enacted in February 2006, provides states with "much of the flexibility they have been seeking over the years to make significant reforms to their Medicaid Programs." CMS provides the following summary: "Section 6082 of the DRA allows for States to operate Medicaid demonstrations programs to test alternative systems to deliver Medicaid benefits through a Health Opportunity Account (HOA) in combination with a high deductible health plan (HDHP)." Since HOAs were designed for Medicaid recipients, the maximum out-of-pocket costs in HOAs are relatively low: $250 for adults and $100 for children. Once the deductible is reached, Medicaid covers the cost of health care services.
The financial structures of these accounts have several parallels to the private market HSAs. CMS has restated that only ten states will be approved to operate HOA Medicaid State Plan Amendments for the first five years of the program. The demonstrations will provide States with the option of allowing individuals to voluntarily assume greater responsibility for their own care by enrolling in flexible consumer-based accounts. Beneficiaries are given the tools to take a greater role and responsibility in their health care." > Full Text of federal "Health Opportunity Accounts" Section 6082, P.L. 109-171
> Health Opportunity Accounts: What Are They, and Why Should State Advocates Care? - Families USA advocacy memo, 2007 [10 pages PDF]
> Medicaid Reform Strategies for Texas: HSAs and HOAs - Feb. 2007
South Carolina was the first state to receive a HOA demonstration grant and the only state reporting a planned HOA demonstration in the Kaiser/HMA survey released 10/07. In FY 2008, South Carolina plans to implement two one-county pilots each limited to 1000 beneficiaries: a voluntary HOA demonstration for healthy adults and children and a voluntary “Health Savings Account” plan using DRA benefit flexibility (discussed in the benefits section). Once a beneficiary’s HOA has been depleted, the member will have out-of-pocket responsibility for 10 percent of costs up to a maximum of $250 for an adult or $100 for a child. No additional cost-sharing is applied thereafter. Online: SC HOA Bulletin, 5/08
Medicare Offers Medical Savings Accounts
In 2007, for the first time, "virtually every" Medicare beneficiary was able to select a Medical Savings Account" (MSA) within Medicare. For the 2008 enrollment period (11/15/07-12/31/07) HSA supporters are spreading the word on this less-publicized option. Greg Scandlen, head of Consumers for Health Care Choices provided a feature in "Health Care News" for January 2008, describing the somewhat difficult-to-navigate web site sponsored by CMS/HHS, that provides the details. Note that most Medicare MSAs do not cover prescription drugs. SEE Medicare MSAs online (state level data.)
TABLE 1:
2009 HSA Legislation (Enacted bills and signed laws, as of April 15, 2009)
|
| State / bill / web link / sponsor |
Description / excerpts of bill text
Bill status may change frequently - check state legislative offices or web sites for the most recent actions. |
UT
HB 188
Rep. Clark |
Amends the Insurance Code and the Governor's Office of Economic Development Code to expand access to the health insurance market, increase market flexibility, and provide greater transparency in the health insurance market.
(filed 2/6/09; signed into law by governor, 3/11/09) |
UT
HB 195
Rep. Lockhart |
Expands the definition of trust in the Uniform Probate Code to include health savings accounts as defined by the Internal Revenue Code; clarifies when a health savings account is established in relation to the account holder's federal income tax year.
(filed 3/25/09; signed into law by governor, 3/25/09)
|
|
VA
HB 2557
Rep. Nixon
|
The Department of Human Resource Management shall establish a plan for providing health insurance coverage for state employees and retired state employees. One of the health coverage options shall be a high deductible health plan that would qualify for a health savings account purusant to Section 223 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(filed 1/20/09; signed into law by governor as Chapter 247, 3/27/09). |
TABLE 1A:
2007-2008 HSA Laws (as of 8/18/08; Enacted bills and signed laws are highlighted) 
|
State / bill
/ web link
/ sponsor |
Description / excerpts of bill text
Bill status may change frequently - check state legislative offices |
|
AK
HB 170
House Labor and Commerce Committee
|
States that a health care insurer that offers, issues, delivers, or renews a health care insurance plan in the state may apply deductible or copayment requirements to health care benefits and services that qualify the health care insurance plan as a high deductible health plan.
(Filed 3/1/07; passed House 4/24/07; passed Senate 5/7/07; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 38, 7/6/07)
|
|
AZ
HB 2789
Rep. McComish
|
Requires that the Department of Administration shall design for state employees a program for the use of health savings accounts with a qualifying state-sponsored high deductible health plan, as defined in Public Law 108-173.
(Filed 4/30/07; passed House 5/30/07; passed Senate 6/18/07; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 263, 6/25/07)
|
|
AR
HB 1484
Rep. Maloch
|
Updates AR tax code to allow continued state tax deduction for HSA contributions.
(Filed 2/13/07; passed House 2/16/07; passed Senate 3/1/07; signed into law by governor as Act No. 218, 3/6/07) |
|
CO
SB 07-01
Sen. Hagedorn |
Creates the Colorado Cares Rx generic drug discount program for uninsured residents under 300 percent of federal poverty. Provides that the program "may expand eligibility" also to "underinsured" residents covered by a high deductible health plan.
(Filed 1/10/07; passed Senate 1/26/07; passed Assembly 2/1/07; signed into law by governor as Act 1, 2/5/07) | |
GA
H 977
Rep. Knox |
Provides for the Commissioner of Insurance to adopt policies to promote, approve and encourage HSA-eligible high deductible plans; provides for health reimbursement arrangement only plans that encourage employer financial support of health insurance or health related expenses; provides for an income tax deduction for high deductible health plans established and used with a health savings account for individuals to employers.
(Filed 1/18/08; passed House and Senate ; signed into law by governor , 5/7/08) |
|
GA
S 383
|
Provides for the Commissioner of Insurance to promote, approve, and encourage health savings account eligible high deductible plans.
(Filed 1/18/08; passed House and Senate ; signed into law by governor , 5/7/08) |
GA
SR 139
Sen. Hill Ju |
Urges the Congress of the United States to raise the allowable deduction for health savings accounts, to allow certain older citizens to contribute additional amounts, and to make all health insurance premiums pre-tax; and for other purposes.
(Filed 2/2/07; passed Senate 3/27/07; passed House 4/19/07; signed into law by governor as Act No. 146)
|
IN
HB 1678
Rep. Brown,
Gov. Daniels |
Establishes the new "Indiana Check Up Program" which combines HSA-like "POWER (Personal Wellness Responsibility) accounts" with high-deductible, back-up commercial health plans to expand coverage to an estimated 140,000 low-income state residents. 350,000 residents meet the eligibility requirements. Qualifying enrollees will pay for a portion of the POWER accounts on a sliding scale of 2%-5% of their annual income, up to annual family income of 200% of federal poverty ($41,000 for a family of four). Prescription drugs are covered without a high-deductible. Increases the state cigarette tax by 44 cents to provide funds for the new Check Up program, estimated to raise $206 million annually. Requires a federal Medicaid waiver; scheduled to take effect January 1, 2008.
( Signed into law by governor 5/10/07/07) |
KS
SB 11
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules and Regulations |
States that the legislative coordinating council shall appoint a legislative study committee during the 2007 interim period to study and review various options for tax credits and benefits for the purchase of long-term care insurance, health earned income tax credits, health insurance and health savings accounts.
(Filed 1/8/07; passed Senate 2/15/07; passed House; 4/2/07; signed into law by governor 5/10/07)
|
KS
S 81 |
As part of health reform, provides for employer-sponsored cafeteria plan, which " may offer the option of paying all or any portion of the health insurance premium or the option of receiving health insurance coverage through a high deductible health plan and the establishment of a health savings account. Also provides that state employees who choose HSAs & HDHPs are entitled to the state contributing funds equal to the cost of the state's standard contribution, to be deposited by the stte into the HSA.
(Passed Senate and House; signed into law by governor as Chapter 2008-164, 6/9/08) |
MD
SB 6a
Sen. Miller |
Establishes a Small Employer Health Benefit Plan Premium Subsidy Program; authorizes the Health Care Commission to alter subsidies; states that contributions to health savings accounts shall be considered premium contributions; also establishes a Health Care Coverage Fund and authorizes the State Health Services Cost Review Commission to assess hospital rates.
(Filed 10/29/07; passed Senate and House; signed into law by governor , 11/19/07) |
MD
SB 780
Sen. Currie |
Requires the Blue Ribbon Commission (Study Retired Health Care Funding Options) to review alternative vehicles for providing health care benefits to State retirees including Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Accounts (VEBAs), section 401 (h) accounts, Section 115 trusts, health reimbursement arrangements, and health savings accounts.
(Filed 2/4/07; passed Senate 3/22/07; passed House 4/5/07; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 355, 5/8/07)
|
MN
SB 1920
Sen. Sparks |
Authorizes commercial banks, savings banks, savings associations, credit unions, or industrial loan and thrift companies to act as trustees or custodians for health savings accounts under federal law.
(Filed 3/15/07; passed Senate 4/23/07; passed House 5/1/07; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 44, 5/4/07)
|
MN
S 3780
Sen. Lourey |
Within a health reform package, provides that "the health insurance benefit plans offered in the commissioner's plan must include an option for a health plan that is compatible with the definition of a high-deductible health plan .
(Signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 358, 5/29/08)
|
|
MS
HB 41
Rep. Janus
|
Provides that amounts received by an individual which may be excluded from income as foreign earned income for federal income tax purposes shall be excluded from gross income for state income tax purposes. The amount deposited in a health savings account, and any interest accrued thereon, that is a part of a health savings account program as specified in the Health Savings Accounts Act created in Sections 83-62-1 through 83-62-9; however, any amount withdrawn from such account for purposes other than paying qualified medical expenses or to procure health coverage.
(Filed 12/21/07; passed House 2/22/07; passed Senate 3/20/07; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 443, 3/26/07)
|
|
MO
HB 818
Rep. Ervin
|
Beginning with the 2009 plan year, the board shall offer to all qualified state employees and retirees and participating public entities the option of receiving health care coverage through a high deductible health plan and the establishment of a health savings account.
(Filed 2/8/07; passed House 4/12/07; passed Senate 5/10/07; signed into law by governor 6/1/07)
|
NJ
S 1557
Sen. Vitale |
As part of health reform plan, provides that for qualified high deductible health plans with a health savings account, a "deductible shall not be applied for any benefits provided" that represent preventive care.
(Passed House; passed Senate; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 2008-38, 7/7/08) |
NC
H 265 |
Establishes the North Carolina health insurance risk pool; funds the program from savings to the general fund realized from the repeal of the tax credit for small business employee health benefits and from other sources. The Pool is required to "offer at least two types of benefit plans including preferred provider organizations with different levels of deductibles and cost-sharing, and at least one choice of a health savings account.
(Filed 2/19/07; passed House and Senate; signed into law by governor as Act 2007-532, 8/31/07/07) |
ND
HB 1301
Rep. Keiser |
Authorizes banks to serve as custodians for health savings accounts and health care cost funding accounts.
(Filed 1/8/07; passed House 1/25/07; passed Senate 3/1/07; signed into law by governor 3/6/07) |
OH
H 119 |
The FY 2008 appropriations bill provides that cities, town counties and other political subdivisions that provide health care benefits for their officers or employees may "establish and maintain a health savings account program in accordance with section 223 of the Internal Revenue Code. Public moneys may be used to pay for or fund federally qualified high deductible health plans that are linked to health savings accounts or to make contributions to health savings accounts.
(Filed 3/20/07; passed House and Senate; signed into law by governor as Chapter 15, 6/30/07) |
|
OK
HB 1928
Rep. Steele
|
Requires the State and Education Employees Group Insurance Board to make the health savings account available to eligible employees; specifying time in which certain plan is offered; requires confirmation of health savings account to certain Board by employees; providing for codification; and declaring an emergency.
(Filed 1/22/07; passed House 3/14/07; passed Senate 4/11/07; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 269 6/04/07)
|
|
OR
SB 329
Sen. Courtney
|
Establishes the Oregon Health Fund program, that includes taking best advantage of health savings accounts and similar vehicles for making health insurance more accessible to uninsured individuals.
(Filed 1/15/07; passed Senate 6/20/07; passed House 6/22/07; signed into law by governor 6/28/07)
|
OR
S 1093a |
Requires the Oregon Health Fund Board to establish a committee to examine the impact of federal law requirements on reducing the
number of Oregonians without health insurance, improving Oregonians' access to health care and achieving the goals of the Healthy Oregon Act, focusing particularly on barriers to reducing the number of uninsured Oregonians, including "Taking best advantage of health savings accounts and similar vehicles for making health insurance more accessible to uninsured individuals."
(Filed 2/08; passed special session , 2/08; signed into law by governor 3/11/08) |
PA
HB 377
Rep. Evans |
Deletd a special "small business health savings account tax credit" that had granted a 50% credit for employers and a 25% credit for emplotees.
( Signed into law by governor as Act 2008-66, 7/9/08) |
RI
H 7390
Rep. Watson |
FY09 budget provides that the department of human services is authorized to create consumer directed health care accounts, including but not limited to health opportunity accounts or health savings accounts, in order to increase and encourage personal responsibility, wellness and healthy decision-making, disease management, and to provide tangible incentives for beneficiaries.
( Signed into law by governor as Public Law 2008-100, 7/9/08) |
|
TX
SB 10
Sen. Nelson
|
Establishes the Medicaid Health Savings Account Pilot Program. If the commission determines that it is cost-effective and feasible, the commission shall develop and implement a Medicaid health savings account.
(Filed 3/1/07; passed Senate 4/17/07; passed House 5/23/07; signed into law by governor 6/14/07)
|
UT
HB 8
Rep. Clark |
Modifies the State Retirement and Insurance Benefit Act by requiring the office to consult with covered employers in addition to certain state agencies prior to determining the amount of annual contributions to an HSA; also allows changes in plans more frequently than the old "once per three years" standard.
(Filed 1/15/07; passed House 2/5/07; passed Senate 2/23/07; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 130. 4/2/07) |
WA
HB 1569
Rep. Cody |
Establishes a Health Insurance Partnership for the purchase of small employer health insurance coverage, evaluating the inclusion of additional health insurance markets in the health insurance partnership, and studying the impact of health insurance mandates. The health benefit plan must include one high deductible health plan as well as a range from catastrophic to comprehensive coverage.]
(Filed 1/23/07; passed House 3/10/07; passed Senate 4/12/07; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 2007-260, 5/2/07)
|
WA
SB 5336
Sen. Murray |
Protects individuals in domestic partnerships by granting certain rights and benefits, including opening joint HSA and high deductible accounts.
(Filed 1/17/07; passed Senate ; passed House ; signed into law by governor , 4/21/07) |
WA
SB 5640
Sen. Kauffman |
Authorizes tribal governments to participate in public employees' benefits board programs; which plans now include HSA options.
(Filed 1/26/07; passed Senate ; passed House ; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 2007-114, 4/18/07) |

TABLE 2:
2005-2006 HSA Legislation (Enacted bills and signed laws are highlighted)
|
| State / bill / web link / sponsor |
Description / excerpts of bill text
Bill status may change frequently - check state legislative offices or web sites for the most recent actions. |
AZ
SB 1416
Sen. Martin |
Provides that a corporation, health care services organization, disability insurer, or group or blanket disability insurer may offer health care plans or disability insurance policies that contain deductibles, coinsurance or copayments without any restriction or limitation on those deductibles, coinsurance or copayments or without any limits on the level of reimbursement for contracted health care providers. The bill also allows a health benefit plan intended to qualify as high deductible plan as defined in the federal tax code to include deductibles, copayments and coinsurance to benefits provided under the health benefit plan.
(Filed 1/31/05; passed Senate 3/10/05; passed House 4/12/05; signed into law by governor as Chapter 111, 4/18/05)
|
|
AK
SB 94
Sen. Dyson
|
Would require State employers to offer an HSA with a high deductible plan to all state employees as an option.
(Filed 1/05, did not pass by end of regular session*)
|
|
AR
HB 1064
Rep. Bond
|
Allows an income tax deduction for contributions made to a health savings account; exempts the interest earned on the account from income tax; makes conforming amendments to existing law.
(Filed 1/05; signed into law by governor as Act No. 94, 2/11/05)
|
|
AR
SB 1136
Sen. Miller
|
Authorizes the State comprehensive health insurance pool act to provide for health savings accounts that comply with applicable federal law; appropriates funds.
(Filed 1/05; signed into law by governor as Act No. 2292, 4/14/05)
|
CA
AB 115
Assm. Klehs |
Amends the Personal Income Tax Law to clarify that contributions to health savings accounts not be excluded from state income tax. "Section 106(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to contributions to health savings accounts, shall not apply."
(Filed 1/12/05; passed Assembly and Senate 9/7/05; signed into law by governor as Chapter 691, 10/7/05) |
|
CA
AB 661
Assm. Plescia
|
Would allow a deduction under the Personal Income Tax Law in connection with health savings accounts in conformity with federal law. Provides related conformity to federal law with respect to treatment of the account as a tax-exempt trust, the allowance of rollovers from Archer medical savings accounts to a health savings account.
(Filed 2/17/05; died in committee 1/31/06)
|
|
CA
SB 173,
SB 195
Sen.
Maldonado
|
Would allow a deduction in connection with health savings accounts in conformity with the 2003 federal law. The deduction would be equal to the cash paid to the HSA. Provides related conformity to federal law with respect to treatment of the account as a tax-exempt trust.
(Filed 2/10/05; died in committee 1/31/06)
|
CA
AB 2281
Assm. Chan |
Would provide protections for consumers with health coverage under a High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP). Would limit annual out-of-pocket expenses (deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, and other amounts, not including premiums) to $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a family; require coverage for preventive care services with no deductible, limit copayments to no more than 30% of the cost of the services and require health plans/insurers to provide specified information including disclosure of charges consumers can expect to pay for contracting and noncontracting providers, and what percent of premiums plans/insurers actually spend on health care services. A guide to HDHP is to be produced my md-2007.
(Filed and referred to committee 3/06; passage refused by Assembly 37y-36n, 5/30/06)
|
| FL |
FY 2005-06 budget provides "The State Group Health Insurance High Deductible Plan and the state-contracted Health Maintenance Organization High Deductible Plan shall include a health savings account feature. Such plans and accounts shall be administered in accordance with the requirements and limitations of federal provisions relating to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. The state shall make a monthly contribution to an employee’s health savings account equal to $41.66 for individual coverage and $83.33 for family coverage.
(Passed House and Senate; signed into law by governor 6/05) |
|
FL
HB 811,
HB 1503,
SB 1660
|
Authorizes health insurance and the Employee Health Care Access Act; and health maintenance organizations to offer high-deductible plans in conjunction with a health savings account; also provides for a healthy lifestyle rebate .
(Filed 2/14/05; HB 811 passed to enrollment 5/6/05; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 2005-231, 6/14/05)
|
|
FL
SB 424
Sen. Carlton
|
Requires the establishment of certain insurance plans within the state group insurance program; requires that high deductible plans include a savings account; specifies the monthly payment amounts for certain types of coverage; authorizes the establishment of health savings accounts for full-time and part-time employees.
(Filed 12/3/04; passed Senate and House ; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 2005-97, 6/1/05)
|
|
FL
SB 660
|
Exempts assets held in benefit plans from legal process in favor of creditors or other claimants assets held in certain medical savings accounts.
(Filed 1/12/05; passed Senate and House ; signed into law by governor as Chapter No. 2005-101, 6/1/05)
|
GA
HB 291 |
Makes an exception to a requirement for a carry-over deductible for policies or plans designed and issued to be compatible with a health savings account created under the federal MMA. Effective 7/1/05.
(Filed 1/05; passed House and Senate ; signed into law by governor as Public Act 82, 5/2/05) |
|
HI
HB 1482,
SB 889,
SB 1465
|
Would allow insurers to offer high-deductible health insurance policies in conjunction with medical savings accounts.
(Filed 1/27/05; in committee 2/10/05, did not pass by end of regular session*)
|
|
ID
SB 1198
Judiciary & Rules Comm.
|
Amends existing law relating to insurance to define individual health savings account (HSA) compatible health benefit plans to reference catastrophic A, catastrophic B and health savings account compatible health benefit plans; and to provide that HSA compatible health benefit plans shall provide a specified lifetime maximum benefit per carrier with cost-sharing features that meet federal qualifications.
(Filed 3/14/05; signed into law by governor as Chapter No.353, 4/12/05)
|
|
IL
HB 24
Rep. Bellock
|
Creates the Health Savings Account Act, providing that, beginning in taxable year 2005, a resident of Illinois or an employer may deposit contributions into a health savings account. Provides that the principal contributed to and the interest earned on a health savings account and money reimbursed to an eligible individual exempt from the Illinois income tax.
(Filed 1/12/05; did not pass by end of session 12/06)
|
|
IL
HB 2387,
HB 2579
Rep. Bellock
|
Would provide state income tax deductions for contributions to and interest on a health savings account, established under the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003.
(Filed 2/16/05; did not pass by end of session 12/06)
|
|
IL
SB 173
|
Authorizes a credit union to act as a trustee or custodian under health savings accounts and similar tax-advantaged plans established under the federal Internal Revenue Code.
(Filed 2/2/05; passed Senate and House 5/5/05; signed into law by governor as Public Act 94-0150, 7/8/05)
|
IL
HB 4430,
HB 4431
(2006) |
Would provide that a resident of Illinois or an employer may deposit contributions. Provides income tax deductions for contributions to and interest on a health savings account, established under the MMA.. HB 4431 would provide that money reimbursed to an eligible individual or an employee for qualified medical expenses is exempt
(Filed; did not pass by end of session 12/06) |
IN
HB 1001 |
The 2005 state budget includes language to conform Indiana income tax code with federal HSA exemptions. Effective 7/1/05.
(Filed 1/06; signed into law by governor as Public Law No. 82, 5/2/05) |
|
IN
HB 1179
|
Updates references to federal laws and regulations in the Uniform Consumer Credit Code; allows credit unions to offer health savings accounts.
(Filed 1/6/05; signed into law by governor as Public Law No. 141, 5/4/05)
|
IA
HB 186 |
Conforms the Iowa state income tax deduction with the federal code; applies retroactively to January 1, 2003, for tax years beginning on or after that date.
(Filed 1/05; passed House and Senate ; signed into law by governor 4/13/05) |
|
IA
SB 314
|
Would relate to contributions made to medical savings accounts for state income tax purposes.
(Filed and sent to committee 3/8/05, did not pass by end of regular session*)
|
|
KS
HB 2098,
HB 2276
|
Authorizes any bank to act as trustee or custodian to manage health savings accounts (HSAs) and medical savings accounts (MSAs) without needing a special permit. HB 2276 has the identical effect, but renumbers sections in HB2098.
(Filed 1/20/2005; passed House 2/9/05; passed Senate 3/16/05; signed into law by governor 3/28/05;
HB 2276 filed 2/3/05; passed House 2/21/05; passed Senate 3/24/05; signed into law by governor 4/13/05)
|
|
KS
SB 257
|
Provides that contributions to health savings accounts by certain employers (small employers, sole proprietors, business partners and limited partners) are eligible for employers' state income tax credits up to $70 per month in year one; $50 per month in year two and $35 per month in year three.
(Filed 2/11/05; passed Senate 3/23/05; passed House 4/1/05; signed into law by governor 4/12/05)
|
|
KY
HB2A (’04),
HB 117,
HB 462
Rep. Harmon
|
Establishes a health savings account for employees and retired teachers participating in the State Health Insurance Plan; requires a high deductible insurance plan in conjunction with the health savings account for the 2006 plan year; sets the deductible for single coverage at $5, 000 and for family coverage at $10,000; requires policy to cover 100% eligible costs after the deductible is met. HB 462 would require a single state-wide HSA choice be offered to public employees by insurers.
(Filed and sent to committee 1/7/05, 2/18/05; did not pass by end of session 3/21/05)
|
KY
HB 272 |
Conforms Kentucky state income tax code to federal tax law after 2001. Effective date: 3/18/05.
(Filed 1/05; signed into law by governor as Public Act 168, 3/18/05)
|
|
ME
HP 146/LD 195,
HP 382,
HP 1053,
SP 489
Rep. Rector
|
Would conform Maine income tax law to federal law regarding tax deductible contributions to health savings accounts, applying to state tax year 2005.
(Filed 1/13/05; HP 146 amended and passed House and Senate 6/10/05, House and Senate non-concurred; did not pass 4/10/06)
|
|
ME
HP 327
|
Would direct the Department of Health and Human Services to establish health savings accounts and a health care management program within the MaineCare (Medicaid) program, subject to a waiver from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
(Filed 1/27/05; did not pass Senate 4/5/05)
|
|
ME
HP 1070A
|
Would require health insurance carriers to offer a catastrophic health plan as alternative coverage for each group plan; concerns employee options to choose a plan; would allow health savings accounts.,
(Filed 4/4/05; did not pass Senate 5/11/05)
|
|
ME
HP 1086A,
SP 625A
|
Would expand the Dirigo Health Insurance program to all residents, and requires that the Board of Directors of Dirigo Health develop a benefit package compatible with federally authorized health savings accounts and provide the opportunity for health savings accounts for all eligible individuals. Limits the out-of-pocket maximums, including deductibles, copayments and coinsurance.
(Filed 4/4/05; did not pass Senate 5/11/05)
|
ME
HP 1418 |
Provides that mandated benefits for prosthetic devices under health plans issues in combination with HSAs may be subject to the same deductibles and out-of-pocket limits that apply to overall benefits under such plans.
(Filed 1/05; signed into law by governor as Public Act 168 3/18/05) |
ME
HP 1358
(2006) |
Would create requirements and standards for health savings accounts for small businesses.
(Filed 1/10/06; did not pass committee by end of 2006 session) |
|
MD
HB 279
|
Would allow a tax deduction of 40% of the amount contributed by an employer to an employee health savings account; beginning in tax year 2005.
(Filed and sent to committee 1/26/05; did not pass by end of regular session 4/05)
|
|
MD
HB 469
|
Would require health insurers, nonprofit health service plans, and health maintenance organizations that offer policies or contracts of health insurance to individuals in the State to offer a high deductible health plan that qualifies for use with a health savings account authorized under the federal Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.
(Filed 2/1/05; withdrawn, did not pass by end of regular session 3/8/05)
|
MD
SB 521 |
Exempts HSA-related high deductible health policies from the prohibition of requiring a deductible for certain home visits to mothers and newborns.
(Filed 1/06; signed into law by governor as Public Act 316, 5/10/05) |
|
MA
H. 3028
Rep. Vallee
|
Would relate to health savings accounts and health care insurance contracts
(Filed 1/05; did not pass committee by end of session 12/06)
|
MA
|
M.G.L. Chapter 62, Section 2(d)(1) establishes that, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2005, Massachusetts adopts the federal deduction allowed to individuals for contributions to a Health Savings Account, subject to federal limitations. [HSA tax guide, 2006] |
MA
H. 4850
Conference Comm. |
Creates the Health Care Access and Affordability Act, a multi-prong approach toward universal coverage. Section 60 enables HMOs to offer high-deductible coverage plans that are linked to health savings accounts, but restricts the maximum deductible to the maximum annual contribution to an HSA (individual coverage $2,700; family coverage $5,450). Such high-deductible policies may only be sold in combination with an HSA. It also requires all individuals who can afford to do so to maintain health insurance through their employer, a state-run program, or in the individual market; private insurance companies would be encouraged to provide lower-cost plans.
(Different versions filed 1/05; conference committee redraft passed 4/4/06; signed into law by governor as Chapter 58, 4/12/06) |
|
MI
HB 4040,
SB 197
|
Would give income tax credit for contributions to health savings accounts.
(Filed and sent to committee 2/15/05, did not pass by end of regular session)
|
|
MI
HB 4041
|
Would expand to include health savings accounts the exemption from health insurance mandates for certain small employer health benefit plans.
(Filed and sent to committee 1/27/05, did not pass by end of regular session*)
|
|
MI
HB 4790,
HB 4791
|
Would create medical savings accounts and an income tax deduction for contributions for long-term care health care expenses.
(Filed and sent to committee 5/17/05, did not pass by end of regular session*)
|
|
MI
SB 198
|
Would give a single business tax credit for businesses that contribute to health savings accounts of employees.
(Filed and sent to committee 2/15/05, did not pass by end of regular session*)
|
MN
HB 138 |
Allows exemption/deduction of HSA contributions from state income taxes.
(Filed 1/05; signed into law by governor as Chapter 4, in special session 7/13/05) |
|
MN
HB 9, HB 135,
HB 1168,
HB 1169,
SB 54, SB 99,
SB 194
|
Would conform state income tax deductions to federal tax changes to encourage consumer-driven health savings accounts.
(Filed 1/6/05; sent to committees 2/05; did not pass by end of session 5/24/05*)
|
|
MN
SB 1164,
SB 1243,
SB 2224
Sen. Ottman
|
Would conform the definition of net income for state income tax purposes to the HSA provisions in the federal Medicare Modernization Act of 2003.
(Filed and sent to committee 2/24/05, ; did not pass by end of session 5/24/05*)
|
|
MS
HB 999,
HB 1128,
HB 1213,
SB 2633
|
Excludes funds deposited in a health savings account from gross income under the state income tax law; provides that withdrawals for purposes other than paying qualified medical expenses will counted as taxable gross income.
(Filed 1/17/05; HB 999 and HB 1118 died in committee ;
HB 1213 passed House and Senate ; signed into law by governor 3/29/05;
SB 2633 passed Senate and House; signed into law by governor 4/6/05)
|
MS
HB 1457,
SB 2963
(2006) |
Would exempt amounts in health savings accounts from seizure and legal execution.
(Filed and sent to committee 1/16/06; HB 1457 favorable committee report, 1/ |
|
MO
SB 532
|
Would create the Medical Ownership Program, a Medicaid coverage program including managed health savings accounts (HSAs).
(Filed and sent to committee 3/3/05; did not pass by end of regular session 5/30/05)
|
|
MT
SB 242,
SB 386
|
Would revise definition of dependent for medical savings account.
(Filed 2/05, did not pass )
|
|
MT
SB 467
|
Would create a high deductible health savings account option for state employees.
(Filed 2/12/05; did not pass committee 3/1/05)
|
NE
LB 465 |
Provides powers relating to health savings accounts; provides and changes provisions relating to exemptions from claims of creditors for medical and health savings accounts.
(Filed 1/13/06; passed legislature; signed into law by governor 6/2/05) |
NV
AB 338 |
Makes changes relating to insurance regulation; provides for the regulation of medical discount plans; allows health insurers to offer policies of health insurance that have high deductibles and are in compliance with federal requirements for health savings accounts.
(Filed 3/31/05; passed Assembly and Senate ; signed into law by governor as Chapter 456, 6/17/05) |
|
NV
SB 240
|
Would require health insurers to provide policies of health insurance which have high deductibles with health savings account.
(Filed 3/21/05; did not pass committee 5/28/05)
|
|
NH
HB 290
|
Relates to the participation in health savings accounts for state and municipal employees. Also would exempt any balances in health savings accounts from the state interest and dividends tax.
(Filed 1/26/05; favorable committee report 3/30/05, did not pass by end of regular session*)
|
|
NJ
A 3440,
S 2435,
S 2574
Assm. Cohen
Sen. Rice
|
Would provide for the establishment of health savings accounts. Would exempt high deductible health plans (HDHPs) from mandated payment of benefits such as newborn hearing screening, blood lead level screening, immunizations, and medically required special infant formulas; the mandates would remain in force for all other health insurance policies.
(Filed 10/21/04; carried over to 2005; A 3440 passed Assembly 6/23/05; did not pass by end of session; see signed law, AB 4543
|
NJ
A 4543
Assm. Cohen |
Concerns availability, deductibles, and certain treatment under high deductible health plans paid through federally qualified health savings accounts. Exempts high deductible policies with HSAs from state mandates for newborn hearing loss screening, measurement for lead poisoning for children and childhood immunizations, but requires HMOs with high deductible policies to offer "care services to any enrollee which include services provided in-network for "medically necessary preventive care as permitted by (the HSA) federal law."
(Filed 12/12/05; passed Assembly and Senate; signed into law by governor as Chapter 248, 12/21/05) |
NJ
A 724,
S 1944
(2006) |
Would extend certain federal income tax advantages of individual health savings accounts to individual taxpayers under the New Jersey gross income tax.
(Filed 1/10/06; held in committee 12/06, subject to carryover to 2007*) |
|
NY
A 2009,
A 9964 (2006)
Assm. Nesbitt,
Assm Barclay
|
Would provide for the establishment of freedom health insurance plans; enabling the use of health savings accounts in New York.
(A 2009 Filed 1/24/05, held in Insurance Committee 6/08/05, 12/05)
(A 9964 filed 2/15/06; held in Insurance Committee 5/13/06 to 12/06)
|
NY
S 6609
Sen. Rath
(2006) |
Would require private insurers to offer as an alternative health savings accounts and qualified high deductible health insurance contracts.
(Filed 2/2/06; held in committee 12/06) |
NY
S 7104
Sen. Seward
(2006) |
Would exempt policies intended for use in combination with health savings accounts pursuant to federal HSA law, from most coverage requirements, mandates and parity requirement for copayments and deductibles otherwise required by state law.
FIled 3/24/06; passed Senate 6/20/06; did not pass Assembly by end of session 12/06) |
|
ND
HB 1208
|
Authorizes excluding high-deductible health plans from mental health, substance abuse and related mandates in order to meet federal requirements for tax qualification of health savings accounts.
(Filed 1/5/05; passed House ; passed Senate ; signed into law by governor 3/15/05)
|
|
OH
HB 5,
SB 5
|
Would permit small employers to offer health care plans without mandated benefits otherwise required by statute, and providing for the operation of health savings accounts consistent with federal laws, also would limit copayments and deductibles paid by persons insured by health benefit plans. Effective 3/27/07.
(Filed and sent to committees 1/24/05; SB 5 passed Senate 11/14/06; passed House 12/7/06; signed into law by governor 12/22/06)
|
|
OH
HB 46
Rep. Schaffer
|
Authorizes all political subdivisions (cities, towns, counties, school districts) that provide health care benefits to use increased tax-deductibility of unreimbursed medical expenses and incorporates favorable state tax treatment of new health savings accounts . Effective date 8/17/06.
(Filed 2/15/05; passed House and Senate ; signed into law by governor 5/16/06)
|
OH
HB 193 |
Permits the sale of group life insurance to specified groups; provides that copayments for a high deductible plan linked to a health savings account are reasonable; authorizes higher deductibles for high deductible health plans linked to health savings accounts; relates to payment of premiums, private retirement plans, exclusion, limited coverage and life insurance policies to creditors.
(Filed 4/12/05; passed House and Senate; signed into law by governor as Session Law 34, 8/16/05) |
|
OK
HB 1535
|
Authorizes and encourages the creation of the Health Savings Accounts, redefines employer's insurance and mandate exemptions.
(Filed 1/21/05; passed House and Senate; signed into law by governor as Chapter 129, 5/9/05)
|
OK
HB 1848 |
Creates the Health Savings Account Act; provides requirements for health savings accounts; provides for tax treatment; provides that withdrawal of money for any other purpose is classified as income. Provides that a transfer under a divorce or separation instrument and the interest after transfer shall be treated as a health savings account.
(Filed 1/21/05; passed House and Senate; signed in to law by governor , 6/6/05) |
|
OR
HB 2436
|
Would expand definition of 'salary' for purposes of benefits under Public Employees Retirement System; provides that salary includes amounts contributed by employee to Health Savings Account or Health Reimbursement Arrangement.
(Filed and sent to committee, 2/2/05, did not pass )
|
|
OR
HB 2952
Rep. Anderson
|
Would make HSAs tax deductible for state income tax purposes, by adopting automatic connection to changes in federal law that relate to health savings accounts for purposes of determining taxable income for Oregon income tax purposes.
(Filed and sent to committee 3/16/05, did not pass )
|
|
PA
HB 107
Rep. Payne
|
Authorizes the establishment and maintenance of health savings accounts and specifies restrictions on HSAs under state law. Eliminates previous mandated requirement that insurers provide coverage of at least one home health visit for new mothers who are discharged from the hospital less than 48 hours following a normal delivery or 96 hours after a Caesarean delivery. Also changed required coverage of medical foods for the treatment of several health conditions. Applies to tax years beginning with 2005.
( Deleted from final bill : Would provide for special tax exclusions from state personal income tax) [HSA PA tax guide, 2006]
(Filed 1/24/05; passed House and sent to Senate 5/24/05, signed into law by governor as Act 48, 7/14/05)
(See partial repeal contained in SB 300 of 2006, below)
|
PA
HB 2125
Rep. Payne |
Would exempt HSA deposits and contributions from state income tax.
(Filed 10/25/05; HB 2125 passed House 3/15/06; did not pass Senate committee 12/06) |
PA
SB 300
Sen. Armstrong |
Repeals part of 2005 HSA law (section 4) that exempted "any income of a health savings account" or any amount paid or distributed out of an HSA.
(Deleted from final bill: Would have exempted HSA deposits and contributions from state income tax.)
(Filed 2/15/05; passed Senate 4/20/05; passed House 6/30/06; signed into law by governor as Act 67, 7/6/06) |
|
RI
HB 5228
|
Modifies state health mandate law to provide that a deductible and coinsurance factor may be applied to early intervention services covered by high deductible health plans issued in conjunction with health savings accounts.
(Filed 2/1/05; passed House and sent to Senate 5/4/05, signed into law by governor 6/28/05)
|
|
TX
HB 330
Rep. Berman
|
Exempts health savings accounts from seizure in legal cases for satisfaction of debts. Effective on signing, 5/24/05.
(Filed 1/7/05; passed House 3/31/05; passed Senate 5/10/05; signed into law by governor 5/24/05)
|
|
TX
HB 1795,
SB 562
|
Would require the creation of health savings accounts (HSAs) by the state for individuals eligible to participate in the insurance coverage provided for state employees, retirees and their dependents.
(Filed 3/1/05; passed House 5/12/05; did not pass Senate by end of regular session 5/19/05)
|
TX
HB 1602 |
Amends the definition of high deductible health plan in state Insurance law; provides that no other provision of law, including mandates, may be construed to prevent use of deductibles or co-payments to qualify a policy or certificate of coverage as a HDHP.
(Filed 1/05; signed into law by governor 5/24/05) |
|
TX
HB 2772
Rep. Farabee
|
Requires an evaluation of the long-term impact of implementing a health reimbursement account program or a health savings account and high-deductible health plan program as a part of the group benefits program for state employees, retirees and their dependents.
(HB 1795 filed 3/1/05; passed House ; held in Senate 5/16/05; HB 2772 passed House and Senate 5/27/05; signed into law by Governor 6/17/05)
|
UT
HB 76
Rep. Daw |
Requires a High Deductible Health Plan and HSA option for Public Employees Benefit and Insurance Program (PEHP).
(Filed 1/4/06; passed House 2/13/06; passed Senate 3/1/06; signed into law by governor as Chapter 276, 3/17/06) |
UT
HB 246
Rep. Morley |
Would authorize the state Health Data Committee, to collect data on the costs of episodes of health care and develop a plan to measure and compare costs of care.
(Filed 1/11/06; passed House 2/22/06; did not pass Senate 3/1/06) | |
UT
HB 301
Rep. Hutchings |
Would provide Consumer Access to Health Care Provider Charges, as part of consumer-driven and HSA health initiative.
(Filed 1/19/06; did not pass House committee 3/1/06) |
UT
HB 334
Rep. Hutchings |
Would require the Public Employees' Benefit and Insurance Program (PEHP) to offer a high deductible health plan with a federally qualified health reimbursement arrangement (HRA).
(Filed 1/25/06; did not pass House 2/24/06; see enrolled HB 76 above) |
|
VA
HB 1492,
SB 1097
|
Requires the Department of Taxation and the State Corporation Commission to amend the Virginia Medical Savings Account Plan to address the provisions of federal law that permit eligible individuals to establish health savings accounts to be called the Virginia Health Savings Account Plan; amends provisions facilitating the sale and use of high deductible health plans.
(Filed 8/5/04; passed House & Senate; signed into law by governor as Acts of Assembly Chapters 503 &. 572, 3/22/05)
|
|
WA
HB 1383,
SB 5202
Rep. Condotta,
Sen. Parlette
|
Would require the state Public Employees' Benefits plan to develop a health savings account option for employees.
Amended to only require a study of public employee health plans and health savings account options
(Filed 1/21/05; passed House 3/14/0505; did not pass Senate 4/24/05)
(SB 5202 passed Senate 47y-0n, passed House 92y-4n, 4/20/05; reconsidered, did not pass House 24y-73n, 4/20/05)
|
WA
SB 6090
Sen. Prentice |
FY05-07 operating budget includes provision for a non-binding study by the Health Care Authority of health savings account option state Public Employees plan.
(Filed 3/22/05; passed House and Senate 4/24/05; signed into law by governor as Chapter 518, 5/17/05) |
WA
HB. 2555 |
Would provide that any insurer offering any health benefit plan to a small employer may offer small group health benefit plans that qualify as insurance coverage combined with a health savings account.
(Filed and sent to committee 1/10/06) |
WI
AB 4
Rep. Kaufert |
Would create a nonrefundable individual state income tax credit for 6.5 percent of the allowable amount that the individual claims as a federal tax deduction for a contribution to a health savings account (HSA).
(Filed 1/05; passed Assembly 63y-33n, 2/15/05; passed Senate 19y-14n, 4/25/06; vetoed by governor , 5/26/06) |
|
WI
AB 341,
SB 131
Rep. Strachota
|
Would relate to the offering of health savings accounts under the state employee health care coverage program.
(Filed and sent to committees 3/31/05, 4/15/05, AB 341 amended 1/24/06; did not pass by committee deadline, 5/26/06)
|

* = State provides for carryover of 2005 bills to 2006 under some circumstances.
TABLE 3:
2004 HSA Legislation (Enacted laws are highlighted)
|
|
State / bill / web link / sponsor
|
Description / excerpts of bill text
Bill status may change frequently - check state legislative offices or web sites for the most recent actions.
|
|
CA
AB 1888
|
Would allow a deduction of the amount deposited in any taxable year by an individual or his or her employer in a medical savings account. Excludes from gross income any interest earned on the moneys deposited in a medical savings account. Exempts from taxation withdrawals made for qualified medical expenses, including qualified long-term care services and eligible long-term care premiums.
(Filed 2/5/04; held in committee; did not pass by end of session 8/31/04)
|
|
CA
AB 2315
|
Would allow a deduction in connection with health savings accounts in conformity with recently enacted federal law. Provides that the deduction would be an amount equal to the aggregate amount paid in cash during the taxable year by or on behalf of an eligible individual to a health savings account of that individual.
(Filed 2/19/04; held in committee 5/19/04 did not pass by end of session 7/04)
|
|
CA
AB 2990
|
Relates to the Knox-Keene Care Service Plan Act of 1975. Would authorize a health care service plan to offer a plan contract with a high deductible for an enrollee or subscriber who has a health savings account that plan contract complies with specified provisions of federal law.
(Filed 2/20/04; held in committee 7/01/04 failed passage 7/04)
|
|
CO
SB 94
|
Concerns the implementation of health savings accounts; eliminates medical savings accounts for basic health benefit plans for small employers; converts the tax provisions for medical savings accounts to apply to health savings accounts.
(Filed 1/12/04; passed by Senate and House; signed by Governor Owens 5/17/04)
|
|
CT
HB 5204
|
Amends Insurance statute provisions regarding high deductible health plans, medical savings accounts, by adding “health saving accounts” and “Archer MSAs” to existing medical savings accounts as not subject to deductible limits under state law.
(Filed 2/11/04; passed House and Senate; signed by governor as Public Act 04-174, 6/1/04)
|
|
FL
HB 1629
|
Creates the Florida Health Insurance Plan; creates Discount Medical Plan Organizations; provides for insurance rebates for healthy lifestyles. Requires Blue Cross and 11 other insurers that sell to small businesses to offer HSAs as an option.
(Passed House and Senate; signed by Governor Bush 6/15/04)
|
|
FL
SB 1486
|
Assets in Benefit Plans: would exempt from legal process in favor of creditors or other claimants' assets held in qualified tuition programs, in certain health savings accounts & medical savings accounts.
(Filed 1/08/04 ; did not pass by end of session 4/30/04)
|
|
HI
HB 1067 &
HB 1293
|
Would establish medical care savings accounts in the employer-union health benefits trust fund for health care needs for state and county employees.
(Filed 1/22/03; carried over to 2004; did not pass ’04 session 5/5/04)
|
|
HI
HB 1167 &
SB 1320
|
Would authorize private insurers, mutual benefit societies, and health maintenance organizations to offer high-deductible health insurance policies in conjunction with medical savings accounts in this State.
(Filed 1/22/03; SB 1320 passed Senate 3/20/03; did not pass ’04 session, 5/5/04)
|
|
HI
HB 2873 &
SB 3143
|
Would establish a mechanism for individuals to open health savings accounts.
(Filed 1/28/04; passed House 3/9/04; did not pass House by end of ’04 session 5/04)
|
|
IL
HB 5459
Speaker Madigan
|
Would amend the Medical Care Savings Account Act of 2000. Makes a change in provisions concerning the prior Act.
(Filed 2/6/04; sent to House Committee on Rules 4/10/04; in committee 7/04).
|
|
KS
SB 348
|
Conformance with federal law regarding health savings accounts; would pertain to the effect of health savings accounts on certain types of coverage.
(Filed 1/23/04; passed Senate , 2/25/04; did not pass House by end of session 5/04)
|
|
KS
HB 2545
|
(In §2) Provides for conformance with federal law regarding health savings accounts; pertains to the effect of health savings accounts on certain types of coverage .
(Passed House and Senate; signed by governor )
|
|
LA
HB 1610
Rep. Morrish
|
Authorizes the LA Office of Group Benefits and political subdivisions such as cities and parishes to establish health savings accounts and similar accounts for their employees; requires political subdivisions to utilize a third party administrator.
(Filed 4/21/04; passed House and Senate; signed by governor as Act 890, 8/2//04)
|
|
LA
SB 538
|
Makes nominal changes relative to health insurance policies, clarifying health savings accounts and high deductible health plans. Certain policies and plans will be exempt from laws on premium rating of small group and individual health insurance policies for small employers.
(Filed 3/19/04; passed by House and Senate; signed by governor as Act 662, 7/7/04)
|
|
ME
HB 211,
HB 707,
LR 1334,
LR 1518,
LR 2599
|
Would establish and permit individual medical savings accounts.
(Filed 1/04; all died on adjournment. 6/14/03; no further action by end of 2004 session)
|
|
MD
HB 933 &
SB 3143
|
Repeals a requirement that the Maryland Health Care Commission develop a modified health benefit plan for medical savings accounts; also repeals a requirement that the Commission adopt regulations that specify a modified health benefit plan for medical savings accounts that meet specified federal qualifications; provides that the rate cap on the Comprehensive Standard Health Benefit Plan in the small group market does not apply.
(Filed 2/11/04; passed House and Senate4/04; signed by governor as Chapter 386, 5/11/04)
|
|
MD
SB 714
|
Would repeal a requirement that the Maryland Health Care Commission develop a modified health benefit plan for medical savings accounts. Also repealing an obligation that the Commission adopt regulations that specify a modified health benefit plan for medical savings accounts that meet specified federal qualifications.
(Filed 2/06/04; passed Senate; Vetoed By Governor )
|
|
MI
HB 5661
Rep. Sheen
|
Would expand exemption from chapter 37 for certain small employer health insurance benefit plans to include health savings accounts.
(Filed 3/17/04; held in committee 7/04)
|
|
MI
HB 5662 &
SB 947
Sen. Patterson
|
Would provide state income tax credit for contributions to a medical savings account. Clarifies deduction of certain expenses related to federal health care savings accounts and Archer medical savings accounts.
(Filed 3/17/04; held in committees 7/04)
|
|
MI
SB 946
Sen. Patterson
|
Would provide for medical savings accounts.
(Filed and sent to committee 2/4/04; held in committee 7/04)
|
|
MI
SB 948
Sen. Hammerstein
|
Would provide single business tax credit for businesses that contribute to medical savings accounts of employees.
(Filed 2/4/04; held in committee 7/04)
|
|
MN
HF 1742 &
SF 1773
Rep. Knoblach
|
Relates to health savings accounts; would conform state law with the federal Medicare Modernization Act with respect to health savings accounts to federal tax changes to encourage consumer-driven health plans.
(Filed; 2/2/04; did not pass committee)
|
|
MN
HF 2437 &
SF 2714
Sen. LeClair
|
Relates to insurance; would make changes in regulation of health insurance; makes changes in banking and insurance laws to accommodate health savings accounts.
(Filed 2/26/04; favorable committee report 3/15/04; did not pass )
|
|
MS
HB 58 ,
HB 1445,
SB 3072
Rep. Howell,
Sen. Hewes
|
Would permit the establishment and maintenance of Health Savings Accounts; exempts certain contributions from gross income (up to 100 percent of the person’s deductible, up to $2,600 annually for an individual); increases the deductible of similar health coverage in determining payment.
(Filed and sent to committee 2/23/04; did not pass during regular session 5/04)
|
|
NH
HB 679
|
Relates to medical savings accounts.
(Filed 1/9/03; did not pass House 3/12/03)
|
|
NJ
A 2197
|
Relates to the Medical Savings Account Option Act for the State Health Benefits Plan.
(Filed 2/9/04; did not pass committee 4/30/04)
|
|
NY
A 10433
Assm. Straniere
|
Relates to establishment of “freedom health insurance plans” as health savings accounts. Would exempt HSAs from the state’s requirements policies qualified for use in conjunction with a health savings account. Existing law specifies that health insurance policies sold in New York must provide enumerated benefits and include mandated provider requirements. These policies do not comport with the concept embodied in health savings accounts, which is to provide catastrophic coverage beyond the high deductibles used in these plans. (Filed 3/30/04; held in committee 11/04) |
|
NY
A 11090, SB 6740
Sen. Rath
|
Would empower the NY Senate President to promulgate regulations establishing health savings accounts and qualified high deductible health insurance plans.
(Filed 4/6/04; held in committees 11/04)
|
|
NC
H 1430
|
As an update from the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), would provide for health savings accounts to receive favorable tax treatment, when used in combination with high deductible health insurance policies.
Note: The Governor’s Budget adjustment recommendations of 5/12/04 also included a provision to conform NC state tax law to the federal law establishing health savings accounts.
(Filed 5/12/04; HSA language removed ; passed Senate 6/21/04; signed by governor without HSA section 7/17/04)
|
|
OH
HB 379 &
HB 436
|
|
|
PA
SB 1111 &
HB 2299
|
Would authorize the establishment and maintenance of health savings accounts; exempting contributions from taxation and imposing restrictions on health savings accounts. (Filed 1/21/04;re-referred to committee 7/2/04) |
|
SD
SB 192
Senator Dempster
|
Original bill required participating providers to provide the same rates to persons who have health savings accounts.
Final bill deletes the rate parity, and only retains language protecting managed care consumers from billing liability “for any covered charges in excess of the copayment, coinsurance, or deductible amounts specified in the coverage, including covered persons who have a health savings account”. Law also regulates managed care plans by protecting physician treatment recommendations (gag clauses) and providing continuity of care.
(Filed 1/27/04; passed Senate 2/10/04; passed House 2/18/04; signed by governor without HSA language 2/27/04)
|
UT
HB 85 |
Amends state health insurance child adoption indemnity benefit to 1) remove requirement for review every two years; 2) increase AIB to $4,000. Establishes that these provisions do not prevent an accident and health insurer from adjusting the benefit payable under this section for cost sharing measures imposed under a policy or contract.
( Signed by governor as Public Act 98, 5/3/04) |
|
WA
HB 3192
|
Would require the public & state employees' benefits board to develop a health savings account option for employees.
(Filed and sent to Committee on Health Care 2/24/04; did not pass in 2004 session)
|
|
WI
AB 775 ,
AB 815 &
SB 409
|
Would adopt federal law as it relates to health savings accounts for state income and franchise tax purposes.
(Filed 1/29/04; f ailed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1, 3/31/04)
|
|
WI
AB 939
|
Would relate to the offering of health savings accounts under the state employee health care coverage program.
(Filed 1/29/04; f ailed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1, 3/31/04)
|
|
WI
SB 536
|
Offering of health savings accounts under the state employees health care coverage program.
(Filed 3/9/04; Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1, 3/31/04)
|
|
WI
SB 568
|
Creating a nonrefundable individual income tax credit for certain amounts relating to health savings accounts that may be deducted from federal income taxes.
(Filed 5/18//04; Vetoed by Governor 5/27/04)
|

News, Opinions, Reports and Useful Links
- "January 2008 Census shows 6.1 million people covered by HSA/high-deductible health plans" - AHIP report released April 2008
-
"A Survey of Preventive Benefits in Health Savings Account (HSA) Plans, July 2007" - AHIP Center for Policy and Research, (November 2007).
-
Consumerism in Health Care Survey, 2007" Enrollment in consumer-driven plans with a tax-advantaged account represented 2 percent of privately insured adults in 2007, up from 1 percent in 2006. One of 10 insured adults had high-deductible health plans without accounts. The Employee Benefit Research Institute and The Commonwealth Fund, Released 3/18/08.
-
Consumerism in Health Care Survey, 2006: Early Experience With High-Deductible and Consumer-Driven Health Plans - study by EBRI/Commonwealth, 5/07. [48 pages PDF ]
-
A Guide for State Legislators: Creating an HSA State" - "A Market-based Solution to Affordable Health Insurance and Lowering the Number of Uninsured Americans." Published by Center for Health Transformation. Updated 4/07. [29 pages PDF]
-
“Large Health Savings Accounts: A Step toward Tax Neutrality for Health Care.” Forum for Health Economics & Policy.
-
I'm Not Going to Pay a Lot for This MRI: Navigating the Brave New World of consumer-directed health care. Article by Michael F. Cannon, Cato Institute, 06/15/07
-
Consumer Directed Health Plan (CDH) Compared to Commercial Insurance Plans, 2004-2005 published by Definity Health, 4/23/07. [4 pages PDF ]
-
Consumer-Driven Healthcare: Current Practices, Future Upgrades - by The Conference Board Consumer-Driven Healthcare Working Group. Purchase required. 3/07.
-
Consumer-Directed Health Plans: Small but Growing Enrollment Fueled by Rising Cost of Health Care Coverage" published by U.S. GAO-06-514, 4/28/06. [38 pages ]
-
Consumer-Driven Healthcare - Its Impact on Physicians -Authored by FCG - Emerging Practices, October 2006 [free registration required] PDF
It is widely known that consumer-driven healthcare (CDH) greatly impacts health plans in how they do business and serve their customers. What is less apparent is how CDH also impacts healthcare providers. Providers will need to anticipate and prepare for CDH-driven changes that will impact revenue collections and market competition. This report highlights some of the expected changes and offers recommendations regarding how providers prepare for them.
-
"Looking to Friedman's Wisdom on Health Care," Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council, 2/1/07.
-
"Communication Challenges Loom Large in Benefit Enrollment Process", Watson Wyatt Survey Finds. 1/31/07.
-
High-Deductible Health Plans Cost More for Women, Study Finds [4/6/07] - as reported by Kaiser Network.
-
Congress Passes Legislation To Expand, Encourage Use of Health Savings Accounts
The House Ways and Means Committee on 9/27/06 voted 24-14 along party lines to approve a bill that seeks to expand enrollment in health savings accounts. The legislation increases the limit on HSA contributions, which is currently capped at the amount of the deductible, to $2,700 for individuals and $5,450 for families. The increase would take effect in the 2006 tax year. In addition, the bill would allow individuals to transfer funds from health reimbursement arrangements and flexible spending accounts to HSAs. The legislation also would allow a one-time transfer of funds from individual retirement accounts to HSAs without a tax penalty. According to estimates by the Joint Committee on Taxation, the bill would increase the number of individuals who have HSAs by 300,000 at a cost of $1 billion over 10 years. Committee Chair Bill Thomas (R-Calif.) said that the legislation has "a very great possibility of being one of the few" to pass before the midterm elections and that the Senate is "very excited" about the bills. (Blinkhorn, CQ Today, 9/27/06).
-
"Health savings accounts slow to catch on among insured" - article, The Dallas Morning News, 10/23/06.
-
Study: 'Consumer-Driven' Coverage Often Reduces Consumer Cost-Sharing - Health Affairs, July/August 2006 [9 pages ]
-
"Consumer-Directed Health Plans: Small but Growing Enrollment Fueled by Rising Cost of Health Care Coverage" U.S. GAO-06-514, 4/28/06 [38 pages ].
-
"Consumer-Driven Health Care Spurs Innovation in Physician Services" released by NCPA, June 12, 2006 [2 pages ]
-
Avoiding necessary care: A Kaiser Family Foundation survey of individuals enrolled in Consumer-Driven Health Plans found that while greater cost-sharing made consumers more price-conscious, they couldn't differentiate between frivolous or necessary care, causing them to avoid both. Individuals in CDHPs were twice as likely to avoid care because of cost than were individuals in traditional plans.
-
Health Savings Accounts: Do the Critics Have a Point?, by Michael F. Cannon, Cato Institute, 5/30/06.
-
Informing the Debate about Health Savings Accounts: An Examination of Some Misunderstood Issues (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 6/13/06)
-
Health Savings Accounts Unlikely to Significantly Reduce Health Care Spending (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 6/12/06)
-
Health Savings Accounts: Why They Won't Cure What Ails US Health Care (Washington: Commonwealth Fund, 6/06)
-
Tutorial: Consumer-Directed Health Plans (kaiserEDU.org, 6/06)
-
"GAO: High-Deductible Insurance on Rise" - Associated Press (Houston Chronicle) 5/30/06
-
Employer Health Benefits 2006 Annual Survey - This annual survey of employers provides a detailed look at trends in employer-sponsored health coverage, including changes in premiums, employee contributions, cost-sharing policies, and other relevant information. This year the survey also documented the prevalence of high-deductible health plans associated with a savings option. Versions: High Deductible Health Plans with Savings Options (Sec. 8, 18 pages) |
News Release | Summary of Findings | Chart Pack | Health Affairs article: Health Benefits In 2006 PDF.
Researchers at the Kaiser Family Foundation, The Center for Studying Health System Change and Health Research and Educational Trust designed and analyzed the survey. Published 9/26/06.
-
"Early Experience With High-Deductible and Consumer-Driven Health Plans: Findings From the EBRI/Commonwealth Fund Consumerism in Health Care Survey | PDF download" This Issue Brief presents results of the first EBRI/Commonwealth Fund Consumerism in Health Care Survey, which was conducted to provide reliable national data on the growth of high deductible plans and their impact on the behavior and attitudes of health care consumers. The survey—the first national one of its kind—found lower satisfaction with consumer-driven plans. 12/7/2005.
-
Health Savings Accounts fastest growing area of the healthcare market - release | survey, according to healthcare executive survey by America Re HealthCare, 4/10/06.
-
Transparency in healthcare a priority An Op-Ed in The Hill by Secretary Mike Leavitt, 5/12/06
-
"Update 2006: Why Are Health Costs Rising?" A market-based perspective brief by National Center for Policy Analysis, 9/21/06. [2 pages ]
-
KFF on "Consumer-Directed Health Care" - This Kaiser Family Foundation tutorial and companion issue module discuss the principles and different models of consumer-directed health care such as Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), and has links to the latest research and policy analysis. 9/06.
-
HSA for America - example of a for-profit company whose goal is "We can help you find a High Deductible Health Plan insurance policy, as well as a Health Savings Account to meet your needs." Fort Collins, CO. 2006.
-
Consumer-Directed Health Plans: Implications for Health Care Quality and Cost - CA Health Care Foundation article on report produced by RAND, June 2005.
NOTES:
1 - The federal legal definition of HSA and HDHP are contained in "Internal Revenue Code of 1986," 100 Stat. 2085, 26 U.S.C. 223, as amended.
Compiled by Richard Cauchi, NCSL Health Program, Denver, with additional material from NCSL researchers Brittany Howe (2007), Shira Gitomer (2004), Madeline Kriescher (2006) in Denver and Kala Ladenheim (D.C. office).

_________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX A
PROs AND CONs OF HSAs
"Insurers will need to change with the times and be able to provide the high-deductible health plans and HSAs defined within the new legislation," said Karin Landry, Managing Partner, Spring Consulting Group, LLC, who has more than 17 years of experience in the insurance, healthcare, risk financing and benefits industries.
Despite recent publicity about HSAs, most U.S. workers have neither heard of HSAs nor understand how they work, according to a 2005 survey by Watson Wyatt Worldwide. HSAs connect with consumer-driven health plans to offer an important alternative to employers seeking to hold the line on costs and engage the consumer in healthcare decision-making. **
HRAs: An Alternative Health Account
HRAs are medical care reimbursement plans established by employers that can be used by employees to pay for health care. HRAs are funded solely by employers. Employers typically commit to make up to a specified amount of money available in the HRA for expenses incurred by employees or their dependents. HRAs are accounting devices, and employers are not required to expend funds until an employee incurs expenses that would be covered by the HRA. Employees may use the HRA to pay for medical expenses and premiums. Unspent funds in the HRA usually can be carried over to the next year (sometimes with a limit). Employees cannot take their HRA balances with them if they leave their job, although an employer can choose to make the remaining balance available to former employees to pay for health care.
HRAs often are offered along with a HDHP. In such cases, the employee pays for health care first out of his or her HRA and then out-of-pocket until the health plan deductible is met. Sometimes certain preventive services are paid for by the plan before the employee meets the deductible. (Source: Employer Health Benefits 2005 Annual Survey by Kaiser & HRET, 9/14/05)
-
Employers have been changing the structure of health benefits in order to control the cost of providing health benefits. Participation in so-called “consumer-driven” health plans, which include high-deductible health plans and a tax-preferred savings or spending account, grew to an estimated 7.5 million adults ages 21–64 with private health insurance in 2007, according to Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI),at the U.S. Senate Finance Committee’s Health Reform Summit. EBRI Research on Employment-Based Health Coverage, June 16, 2008.
-
The General Accountability Office (GAO), an investigative arm of Congress, found the plans do indeed attract the wealthier, those with an average income of $139,000, compared with about $57,000 among others plans, an analysis based on income tax records. The plans are typically coupled with a tax-favored savings account to help patients pay for medical bills. About 40 percent of those in the plans chose that option, GAO found. "Health Savings Accounts: Participation Increased and Was More Common among Individuals with Higher Incomes" GAO-08-474R, April 1, 2008.
-
"More than 6.1 million people were covered by High Deductible plans by the beginning of 2008, up from about 3.2 million in 2006", according to America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP). States with the highest percentage of HSA/HDHP enrollees among their under 65 populations with private health insurance were Minnesota (9.2 percent), Louisiana (9.0 percent), District of Columbia (8.7 percent), Vermont (7.5 percent), Colorado (7.1 percent), Nebraska (6.4 percent), Connecticut (5.8 percent), Wisconsin (5.6 percent), Indiana (5.1 percent), and Iowa (5.0 percent).
For HSAs, the average length of time accounts had been open was 16 months. During the year 2007, 83 percent of the reported accounts in place had average annual balances of $2,500 or less; 7 percent had account balances over $5,000. The average balance in HSA accounts in 2007 was approximately $1,380. The average amount spent from HSA accounts in 2007 was approximately $1,080.
> [Reuters: "Wealthier pick high-deductible health plans-US GAO" 5/1/08].
-
Enrollment in consumer-driven plans with a tax-advantaged account represented 2 percent of privately insured adults in 2007, up from 1 percent in 2006. This represents 2.3 million adults ages 21-64 with private insurance. More than 30% nnrolled in Consumer-Driven Plans have household incomes over $100,000 a year. One of 10 HDHP insured adults had high-deductible health plans without accounts. "Consumerism in Health Care Survey, 2007" The Employee Benefit Research Institute and The Commonwealth Fund, released 3/18/08.
-
About one percent of the privately insured
U.S. population ages 21–64 (or 1.3 million individuals) were enrolled in a plan with either an HSA or HRA, collectively known as consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs), as of September 2006, according to the second annual Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI)-Commonwealth Fund Consumerism in Health Care Survey. Another 7 percent, or 8.5 million adults, had plans with deductibles high enough to qualify for health savings account, but of these only 2.6 million were offered or aware of the option to open an HSA. . The survey showed that among individuals with a CDHP, 57 percent of respondents had an account for less than one year. Overall, 14 percent had no money in their account and another 32 percent had less than $500. EBRI Issue Brief http://www.ebri.org/ December 2006.
-
"HSA Penetration Reaches 5% But Varies by State, ISI Study Shows." Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) have had varying levels of adoption when taken on a state-by-state but are approaching 5% of all healthcare insurance users on a nation-wide basis, according to an analysis by Information Strategies, Inc. (ISI). Among the states with the highest penetration, 5-7% were Wisconsin, Texas, Georgia, Florida, Illinois, Ohio, Tennessee and Kentucky. Amongst the lowest with penetration levels below 2% are New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Hawaii and Vermont." [50-state map] Published by hsafinder.com, 5/07.
-
The "Qualified High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) Atlas" - provides "a snapshot of the HDHP market with independent statistics, and allows viewers to interactively navigate around the country to see currently available prices, premiums and HDHP product features." A companion Market Report with supplementary information on HDHP availability for 44 states and the District of Columbia, can be downloaded at no charge. HDHP Atlas | HDHP Market Report [PDF]
-
HSA/HDHP coverage in the group market rose from 397,000 in March 2005 to 1.4 million in January 2006. Nationally, three million people, just over two percent of the private health insurance market, had high deductible health plans (HDHP) "qualified" for use with HSAs, according to Larry Akey, describing a survey completed in late January for America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP). Enrollment in the individual market rose from 556,000 in March 2005 to 855,000 in January 2006.
- In the individual market, 31 percent of new enrollees in HSA/HDHP plans were previously uninsured. In the small-group market, 33 percent of enrollment in HSA/HDHP plans was in small companies that previously did not offer coverage.
- A separate survey by the trade publication, Inside Consumer-Directed Care, (2/28/06) reported 820,000 HSA accounts existed by January 1, 2006, containing a total of $967 million in HSA assets, an average balance of $1,181.
- In September 2006, Blues Plans collectively claimed "nearly 1.2 million lives are covered by a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) that is compatible with HSAs. Another 653,341 were enrolled in an HRA (health reimbursement arrangement). United Health Group also "says its account based plans cover about 2 million lives. [AIS Report: BC/BS Plans, 9/06]
- Harris Interactive reported that of consumers with an HDHP, only 13% have an associated financial account.
- 28 percent of employers currently offer a CDHP to their employees, which is up from 22 percent in 2005. (Aon survey 6/06)
- Of those employers with a CDHP, 75 percent began offering the plan in 2005 or 2006, illustrating the relative newness of the concept and its growing appeal.
- The use of health reimbursement arrangements (HRA) and health savings accounts (HSA) have evolved since last year. Today, 43 percent of organizations with CDHPs offer an HRA, 48 percent offer an HSA and 10 percent offer both. This compared to last year when 65 percent offered an HRA, 15 percent offered an HSA and 15 percent offered both. (Aon survey 6/06)
- A survey released by Watson Wyatt in March 2005 showed that among large employers, 8 percent offered health savings accounts, 18 percent planned to offer them in 2006 and 47 percent were considering offering them. The company polled 555 employers with at least 1,000 workers each.
- High-deductible health insurance policies eligible for linking with tax-free savings accounts through a new federal program have attracted more families and low-income people than had been expected, a March 2005 study concluded. Almost half the purchasers of policies eligible for coupling with Health Savings Accounts were families and 40 percent had incomes of $50,000 or less, according to the study, which was conducted by www.ehealthinsurance.com, an online service representing more than 140 health insurance carriers nationwide.
- Another survey also focused on the growing employer involvements in the consumer health trend, showing "74 percent of the companies offering CDHPs started them in 2004 and 2005, with over half that group only implementing CDHPs this January" of 2005. ***
- In July 2005, the New York Times reported that some banks, including J. P. Morgan Chase, "were ready at the beginning of 2004 with health savings accounts that mimicked existing online banking programs. About 40,000 people have signed up for health savings accounts at Chase and the bank expects that number to increase tenfold over the next year, executives there said. One major insurer, the UnitedHealth Group, has gone so far as to set up its own bank, called Exante, to offer health savings accounts, and says that 44,000 accounts have been opened there, with an average monthly deposit of $862, including money contributed by both employers and employees." [4]
- Health accounts get noticed: The tax-free accounts have attracted more low-income people than industry watchers expected. Kansas.com, March 27, 2005.
- The Commonwealth Fund released a study on 1/27/05, that found that people with high-deductible policies were more likely to have trouble paying medical bills than those in traditional insurance plans. They were also more likely to skip care because of cost. The study did not look at the combination of high-deductible plans with HSAs.
- "HealthBenefitsReform" · A Yahoo online discussion group devoted to "Dealing with Consumer Driven Health Care"
|